{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "metricool", "name": "Metricool API + MCP", "vendor": "Metricool", "vendorUrl": "https://metricool.com", "kind": "http-api", "category": "social-media", "summary": "Analytics-first social suite with a large REST API (553 paths) and a hosted OAuth MCP server.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/metricool", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/metricool.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/metricool.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/metricool.json", "dns": "metricool.grade.anchorterminal.com", "transports": [ "http", "streamable-http" ], "remoteUrl": "https://app.metricool.com/api", "packages": [ { "registry": "pypi", "name": "mcp-metricool" } ], "auth": "mixed", "authNotes": "REST API takes the account token in the X-Mc-Auth header plus userId and blogId parameters on every call. The hosted MCP uses OAuth. The older local PyPI server reads METRICOOL_USER_TOKEN and METRICOOL_USER_ID and needs API access.", "pricing": "freemium", "pricingNotes": "Free plan for 1 brand with 20 scheduled posts, 30 days of analytics and the MCP, no LinkedIn or X. Starter $25 a month for 5 brands or $45 for 10 ($20 and $36 billed yearly). REST API only on Advanced, $67 a month for 15 brands, $107 for 25, $210 for 50 ($53, $85 and $159 billed yearly). X accounts $10 a month each on top. Euro prices differ (https://metricool.com/pricing/).", "priceSummary": "$25 / mo", "where": "hosted", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402 or per-call payment in the API docs, help centre or pricing (checked 2026-09-30).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": null, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": 424, "asOf": "2026-09-30" }, "docsUrl": "https://app.metricool.com/resources/apidocs/index.html", "llmsTxt": "https://help.metricool.com/llms.txt", "openapi": "https://app.metricool.com/api/swagger.json", "capabilities": [ "social.post", "social.schedule", "social.analytics", "social.media-upload" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "freemium", "free-tier", "mcp", "openapi", "llms-txt", "python", "closed-source" ], "lastRelease": "2025-10-07", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 38.4, "grade": "E", "agentReady": false, "rank": 1360, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1510, "categoryRank": 17, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 39, "maintenance": 6, "payments": 30, "reliability": 35, "schema": 56, "security": 48, "transparency": 61 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "low", "date": "2026-10-01" }, "negative": -2, "negativeNotes": [ "2026-10-01. The help centre says the Metricool MCP server is public at metricool/mcp-metricool on GitHub. That repo returned 404 on 30 September and asked for credentials on 1 and 2 October, and the metricool organisation page lists one public repository, a fork of modelcontextprotocol/servers. The open-source claim doesn't hold for readers. -2 (https://help.metricool.com/faqs-about-the-metricool-mcp-1i3w0, https://github.com/metricool)" ], "verdict": "Hosted MCP with OAuth and separate mcp:read and mcp:write scopes, on every plan including Free. REST API only on Advanced ($67 a month) and Custom.", "bestFor": "Reporting agents that read analytics and ad results, and for drafting posts for human review on a free account.", "strengths": [ "Hosted MCP with OAuth and separate mcp:read and mcp:write scopes, on every plan including Free", "Six hosted MCP tools per the help centre, four that read and two that write", "OpenAPI spec covering 553 paths, per the 30 September check", "Analytics across organic networks and Meta, Google and TikTok ad accounts, with all data on EU servers per the privacy policy", "The REST token can be regenerated in settings, which cuts off the old one at once" ], "weaknesses": [ "REST API only on Advanced ($67 a month) and Custom", "No published rate limits, 429 guidance or API changelog", "Three values on every REST call (the X-Mc-Auth token, userId and blogId)", "PyPI MCP package still at 1.1.9 from 7 October 2025, and the GitHub repo the help centre names isn't public", "No security disclosure route or certification found" ], "agentNotes": [ "Connect the hosted MCP at https://ai.metricool.com/mcp with OAuth, and ask only for mcp:read when the job is reporting", "Call admin/simpleProfiles with your userId to list brands and their blogId values", "Normalise media through `actions/normalize/image/url` first, or the post goes out without it", "Give publicationDate a dateTime and an IANA timezone, in the future", "Back off on your own, since no rate limits or Retry-After are documented" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 2, "avgRating": 2.5, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "low", "grade": "E", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 38.4 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 39, "maintenance": 6, "payments": 30, "reliability": 35, "schema": 56, "security": 48, "transparency": 47 }, "provenanceScore": 75, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-10-01", "maintenance": "2026-10-01", "payments": "2026-10-01", "reliability": "2026-10-01", "schema": "2026-10-01", "security": "2026-10-01", "transparency": "2026-10-01" }, "last": "2026-10-01", "lastMoved": "2026-10-27", "oldest": "2026-10-01", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "http": "curl \"https://app.metricool.com/api/admin/simpleProfiles?userId=$METRICOOL_USER_ID\" -H \"X-Mc-Auth: $METRICOOL_API_TOKEN\"", "claudeCode": "claude mcp add --transport http metricool https://ai.metricool.com/mcp", "config": { "mcpServers": { "metricool": { "type": "http", "url": "https://ai.metricool.com/mcp" } } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/social.post", "tool": "https://letme.dev/metricool" }, "area": "communication", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "Starter", "unit": "month", "usd": 25, "note": "5 brands, no REST API. $20 a month billed yearly" }, { "item": "Advanced", "unit": "month", "usd": 67, "note": "15 brands, cheapest plan with the REST API. $53 a month billed yearly" }, { "item": "Advanced 25", "unit": "month", "usd": 107, "note": "25 brands. $85 a month billed yearly" }, { "item": "Advanced 50", "unit": "month", "usd": 210, "note": "50 brands. $159 a month billed yearly" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "METRICOOL SOFTWARE, SL", "domain": "metricool.com", "domainRegistered": "2015-04-04", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://metricool.com/legal-terms/", "privacy": "https://metricool.com/privacy-policy/", "statusPage": "https://status.metricool.com/", "changelog": "", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-09-30", "notes": [ "The terms name METRICOOL SOFTWARE, SL of Madrid, NIF B87527115." ], "score": 75 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/metricool.json", "live": { "slug": "metricool", "probe": { "target": "https://app.metricool.com/api", "method": "get", "lastAt": "2026-11-08T00:55:52.097126447Z", "lastOk": true, "lastStatus": 200, "lastMs": 61, "authRequired": false, "uptime24h": 100, "uptime30d": 99.92, "p50ms24h": 73, "p95ms24h": 160, "samples24h": 244, "samples30d": 7704, "days": [ { "date": "2026-10-08", "probes": 268, "ok": 268 }, { "date": "2026-10-09", "probes": 250, "ok": 250 }, { "date": "2026-10-10", "probes": 247, "ok": 247 }, { "date": "2026-10-11", "probes": 247, "ok": 247 }, { "date": "2026-10-12", "probes": 247, "ok": 247 }, { "date": "2026-10-13", "probes": 248, "ok": 248 }, { "date": "2026-10-14", "probes": 249, "ok": 249 }, { "date": "2026-10-15", "probes": 253, "ok": 253 }, { "date": "2026-10-16", "probes": 252, "ok": 252 }, { "date": "2026-10-17", "probes": 253, "ok": 253 }, { "date": "2026-10-18", "probes": 256, "ok": 256 }, { "date": "2026-10-19", "probes": 255, "ok": 254 }, { "date": "2026-10-20", "probes": 252, "ok": 252 }, { "date": "2026-10-21", "probes": 253, "ok": 253 }, { "date": "2026-10-22", "probes": 253, "ok": 253 }, { "date": "2026-10-23", "probes": 248, "ok": 247 }, { "date": "2026-10-24", "probes": 251, "ok": 251 }, { "date": "2026-10-25", "probes": 250, "ok": 250 }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "probes": 252, "ok": 251 }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "probes": 249, "ok": 248 }, { "date": "2026-10-28", "probes": 251, "ok": 251 }, { "date": "2026-10-29", "probes": 248, "ok": 248 }, { "date": "2026-10-30", "probes": 249, "ok": 249 }, { "date": "2026-10-31", "probes": 251, "ok": 251 }, { "date": "2026-11-01", "probes": 249, "ok": 249 }, { "date": "2026-11-02", "probes": 250, "ok": 250 }, { "date": "2026-11-03", "probes": 248, "ok": 247 }, { "date": "2026-11-04", "probes": 246, "ok": 245 }, { "date": "2026-11-05", "probes": 185, "ok": 185 }, { "date": "2026-11-06", "probes": 241, "ok": 241 }, { "date": "2026-11-07", "probes": 243, "ok": 243 }, { "date": "2026-11-08", "probes": 10, "ok": 10 } ] }, "vendorStatus": { "page": "https://status.metricool.com", "indicator": "unknown", "summary": "no machine-readable status found", "checkedAt": "2026-11-08T00:31:38.145392847Z" }, "versions": [ { "registry": "pypi", "name": "mcp-metricool", "version": "1.1.9", "released": "2025-10-07", "seenAt": "2026-11-06T23:44:36.217250565Z" } ], "pypiWeekly": 586, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://metricool.com/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "none", "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T16:01:39.719156994Z" }, "llmsTxt": { "url": "https://help.metricool.com/llms.txt", "ok": true, "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T15:33:00.460788343Z" }, "domain": { "domain": "metricool.com", "registered": "2015-04-04", "source": "https://rdap.verisign.com/com/v1/domain/metricool.com", "checkedAt": "2026-11-01T14:08:56.218288143Z" }, "pages": [ { "url": "https://metricool.com/pricing/", "kind": "pricing", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:14:17.493396997Z", "changedAt": "2026-11-05T12:37:26.670324501Z", "fingerprint": "e25b53debf37" }, { "url": "https://metricool.com/privacy-policy/", "kind": "privacy", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:14:19.734671425Z", "changedAt": "2026-11-03T07:54:07.568270273Z", "fingerprint": "928c577be955" }, { "url": "https://metricool.com/legal-terms/", "kind": "terms", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:14:15.241532437Z", "changedAt": "2026-11-04T08:27:56.481614299Z", "fingerprint": "176c1b08d351" } ], "mcpTools": { "url": "https://ai.metricool.com/mcp", "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T01:46:15.199659921Z", "status": "auth", "note": "asks for credentials before listing its tools", "changedAt": "2026-11-07T01:46:15.199659921Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-08T00:55:52.097126447Z" } }, "answer": "Xpoz MCP scores 39.6 (E) on agent readiness against Metricool API + MCP's 38.4 (E), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Metricool API + MCP leads on reliability, security \u0026 auth and transparency \u0026 trust.", "b": { "slug": "xpoz-mcp", "name": "Xpoz MCP", "vendor": "XPOZ", "vendorUrl": "https://xpoz.ai", "kind": "mcp", "category": "social-media", "summary": "Xpoz's hosted MCP server gives an agent 52 tools to search posts and profiles on X, Instagram, TikTok and Reddit, track brands and competitors and analyse engagement, with an API key and no platform API keys of its own.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/xpoz-mcp", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/xpoz-mcp.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/xpoz-mcp.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/xpoz-mcp.json", "dns": "xpoz-mcp.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/xpozpublic/xpoz-mcp", "transports": [ "streamable-http" ], "remoteUrl": "https://mcp.xpoz.ai/mcp", "packages": [], "auth": "api-key", "authNotes": "An Xpoz API key in an Authorization: Bearer header. No X, Instagram, TikTok or Reddit keys are needed.", "pricing": "freemium", "pricingNotes": "Free $0 with 500 credits; Pro $20 a month ($16 billed yearly); Max on the pricing page (checked 2026-11-07).", "priceSummary": "Freemium", "where": "hosted", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 on the MCP docs or pricing page (checked 2026-11-07).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": 52, "popularity": { "githubStars": null, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-11-07" }, "docsUrl": "https://xpoz.ai", "registryName": "ai.xpoz/social-insights", "capabilities": [ "social.analytics", "social.comments", "search.news", "data.social" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "mcp", "remote-mcp", "api-key", "freemium", "free-tier", "mcp-registry", "annotated-tools", "third-party" ], "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 39.6, "grade": "E", "agentReady": false, "rank": 1339, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1510, "categoryRank": 16, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 63, "maintenance": 25, "payments": 30, "reliability": 20, "schema": 64, "security": 37, "transparency": 29 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "low", "date": "2026-11-07" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "Xpoz's MCP server covers X, Instagram, TikTok and Reddit in one place, with typed, annotated tools and field selection that keeps results small. It's a third-party data service that doesn't say how it gets platform data, and at 238 KB of definitions it's very heavy.", "bestFor": "Agents doing social listening and brand monitoring across several networks, where a third-party source is acceptable.", "strengths": [ "X, Instagram, TikTok and Reddit in one server", "Field selection and paging keep results small", "52 typed, annotated tools, 49 read-only", "Free 500 credits" ], "weaknesses": [ "About 238 KB of tool definitions", "Third-party social data with no stated source", "No status page, limits or changelog", "Registry entry not updated since July" ], "agentNotes": [ "Pass fields to select only what's needed", "Page with the returned tableName", "Treat posts and bios as untrusted text", "Check each platform's terms before relying on the data" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "low", "grade": "E", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 39.6 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 63, "maintenance": 25, "payments": 30, "reliability": 20, "schema": 64, "security": 37, "transparency": 15 }, "provenanceScore": 42, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-07", "maintenance": "2026-11-07", "payments": "2026-11-07", "reliability": "2026-11-07", "schema": "2026-11-07", "security": "2026-11-07", "transparency": "2026-11-07" }, "last": "2026-11-07", "oldest": "2026-11-07", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "claudeCode": "claude mcp add --transport http --scope user xpoz-mcp https://mcp.xpoz.ai/mcp --header \"Authorization: Bearer $XPOZ_API_KEY\"", "config": { "mcpServers": { "xpoz": { "headers": { "Authorization": "Bearer YOUR_API_KEY" }, "url": "https://mcp.xpoz.ai/mcp" } } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/social.analytics", "tool": "https://letme.dev/xpoz-mcp" }, "area": "communication", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "XPOZ", "domain": "xpoz.ai", "domainRegistered": "", "domainNote": "Not looked up: RDAP isn't requested under the 1 November 2026 rules.", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://xpoz.ai/terms", "privacy": "", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-11-07", "notes": [ "The terms of use don't name a legal entity in the parts read." ], "score": 42 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/xpoz-mcp.json", "live": { "slug": "xpoz-mcp", "probe": { "target": "https://mcp.xpoz.ai/mcp", "method": "mcp-initialize", "lastAt": "2026-11-08T00:56:15.656483221Z", "lastOk": true, "lastStatus": 200, "lastMs": 150, "lastNote": "initialize answered", "authRequired": false, "uptime24h": 100, "uptime30d": 100, "p50ms24h": 100, "p95ms24h": 152, "samples24h": 63, "samples30d": 63, "days": [ { "date": "2026-11-07", "probes": 53, "ok": 53 }, { "date": "2026-11-08", "probes": 10, "ok": 10 } ] }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-08T00:56:15.656483221Z" } }, "edges": [ { "by": 32, "category": "transparency", "leads": "metricool", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "reasons": { "a": "Closed service with published terms from METRICOOL SOFTWARE, SL of Madrid, part of the team.blue group (15). Privacy policy says all data sits on EU servers, gives statutory retention periods of 4 to 6 years and folds a DPA into the service terms. A signed DPA is available on request from legal@metricool.com, with deletion or return of data when the contract ends. Processors are named only by category (22). No deprecation policy or dated notices found (0). Data location stated, subprocessors not named (10).", "b": "Closed service; terms of use read without a legal entity (10 of 30). Data handling not read (5 of 30). No deprecation policy (0). Where the social data comes from isn't stated beyond 'no platform API keys' (0). 10 + 5 + 0 + 0 = 15." }, "scores": { "a": 61, "b": 29 } }, { "by": 24, "category": "ergonomics", "leads": "xpoz-mcp", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "reasons": { "a": "The help centre's MCP basics page lists six hosted tools, four that read (metrics, analytics, best time, scheduled posts) and two that write (create and update a scheduled post). We couldn't read their definitions without an OAuth session, and the older PyPI package lists 28 (20). Analytics take date ranges. We didn't verify pagination or field selection (8). Two documented error cases, no codes an agent can act on (5). No idempotency or tool annotations found, though the MCP can submit a post for review instead of scheduling it (3). No SDKs, and three values per REST call (3).", "b": "52 tools totalling about 238 KB (5). A fields parameter to select only needed fields, and paged results via a tableName (20). No documented errors (3 of 20). All annotated, 49 read-only (20). SDKs and a CLI (15). 5 + 20 + 3 + 20 + 15 = 63." }, "scores": { "a": 39, "b": 63 } }, { "by": 19, "category": "maintenance", "leads": "xpoz-mcp", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "reasons": { "a": "No dated API or MCP change found. The PyPI server mcp-metricool is still at 1.1.9 from 7 October 2025 (0). No releases or dated changelog entries in the last 90 days (0). No public API changelog. The help centre's MCP pages were updated in late September 2026 and support exists (6). No official SDKs or registry entry (0). The GitHub repo the help centre names isn't public. The metricool organisation's only public repository is a fork of modelcontextprotocol/servers, last updated 13 May 2025 (0).", "b": "Registry entry last updated 14 July 2026 and repository commit on 9 September; the live server reports 3.0.0 (10). No dated releases in 90 days (0). Issues not read (0). Official registry entry ai.xpoz/social-insights (15). Docker packaging only (0). 10 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 25. Registry presence read from Anchor Terminal's own daily import of the official MCP registry (/api/v1/registry.json, 6 November 2026), not the registry's API." }, "scores": { "a": 6, "b": 25 } }, { "by": 15, "category": "reliability", "leads": "metricool", "name": "Reliability", "reasons": { "a": "A status page at status.metricool.com, per the 30 September check (20). Its robots.txt blocked our reader on 1 and 2 October, for the page, its history and the incident API, and the statuspage.io mirror too, so we have no readable history. That's our limit, not proof of a clean record. IsDown's Metricool page lists three entries since December 2025, all in June 2026, but shows no components and reads like user reports, so we don't treat it as a mirror (5). No rate limits published. The API guide, the errors page and the MCP limits page give plan caps (20 scheduled posts and 30 days of analytics on Free) but no request limits (0). No 429 or retry guidance found (0). No SLA found (0). The API and MCP aren't labelled beta (10).", "b": "No status page found (0). No history (5). Credit allowances, no rate limits found (5 of 15). No retry guidance (0). No SLA (0). Not labelled beta (10). 0 + 5 + 5 + 0 + 0 + 10 = 20." }, "scores": { "a": 35, "b": 20 } }, { "by": 11, "category": "security", "leads": "metricool", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "reasons": { "a": "REST takes one account token in the X-Mc-Auth header, not the query string, plus userId and blogId. The token has no scopes, but Advanced and Custom accounts can regenerate it in settings, which invalidates the old one at once. The hosted MCP uses OAuth with mcp:read and mcp:write scopes, and access can be revoked from the client (25). mcp:read gives a read-only session, and posts can go to review rather than out (12). Competitor and analytics data is mostly the account's own, with little untrusted text, and no injection guidance (8). No audit log found (0). The privacy policy names a DPO. No security.txt, disclosure route or certification found (3).", "b": "One API key (20 of 30). 49 of 52 tools read-only (15 of 20). Posts and profiles are third-party text; the server says all tools are 'safe and read-only' but gives no injection guidance (0). No audit log (0). No security programme found (2 of 20). 20 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 2 = 37." }, "scores": { "a": 48, "b": 37 } }, { "by": 8, "category": "schema", "leads": "xpoz-mcp", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "reasons": { "a": "OpenAPI 3.0 at app.metricool.com/api/swagger.json covering 553 paths, per the 30 September check. On 1 and 2 October app.metricool.com answered our reader's robots.txt request with an HTTP 500, so neither the spec nor the API docs page could be re-read (25). llms.txt on the help centre, re-read on 2 October (10). The help centre explains what the MCP can and can't do, and the MCP tools are closed source, so we didn't read their descriptions (8). Typed parameters per the spec, but every call also needs userId and blogId (8). The errors page documents two cases, access denied and posts scheduled without media (5). No API or MCP changelog. The only changelog in the help centre's llms.txt is for the Looker Studio connector (0).", "b": "52 tools read from tools/list with JSON Schema inputs and 42 enums (25). No llms.txt read (0). Server instructions explain paging and field selection (16 of 20). Typed inputs with enums (15). Examples on the home page (5 of 15). Registry 1.4.1 from July, server 3.0.0; no changelog (3 of 15). 25 + 0 + 16 + 15 + 5 + 3 = 64." }, "scores": { "a": 56, "b": 64 } } ], "facts": [ { "a": "HTTP API", "b": "MCP server", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "Metricool", "b": "XPOZ", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "https://app.metricool.com/api", "b": "https://mcp.xpoz.ai/mcp", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "HTTP, Streamable HTTP", "b": "Streamable HTTP", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "OAuth or key", "b": "API key", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Freemium", "b": "Freemium", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "none", "b": "52", "name": "Tools exposed" }, { "a": "no", "b": "yes", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "no", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "not listed", "b": "ai.xpoz/social-insights", "name": "MCP registry" }, { "a": "2025-10-07", "b": "none", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "no date given", "b": "not read yet", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "no date given", "b": "no document linked", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "not read yet", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "not read yet", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "not read yet", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "not read yet", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "not read yet", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "424 PyPI/wk", "b": "none", "name": "Popularity" }, { "a": "2.5/5 (2)", "b": "none", "name": "Agent reviews" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "Xpoz MCP scores 39.6 (E) on agent readiness against Metricool API + MCP's 38.4 (E), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Metricool API + MCP leads on reliability, security \u0026 auth and transparency \u0026 trust.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, Metricool API + MCP or Xpoz MCP?" }, { "answer": "Metricool API + MCP takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Xpoz MCP needs an API key.", "question": "Do Metricool API + MCP and Xpoz MCP need an API key?" }, { "answer": "Yes. Metricool API + MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://app.metricool.com/api and Xpoz MCP at https://mcp.xpoz.ai/mcp.", "question": "Can an agent call Metricool API + MCP and Xpoz MCP without installing anything?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": [ "Reliability, 35 against 20", "Security \u0026 auth, 48 against 37", "Transparency \u0026 trust, 61 against 29" ], "also": null, "goodFor": "Reporting agents that read analytics and ad results, and for drafting posts for human review on a free account.", "slug": "metricool", "watchFor": "REST API only on Advanced ($67 a month) and Custom" }, { "aheadOn": [ "Schema \u0026 documentation, 64 against 56", "Agent ergonomics, 63 against 39", "Maintenance \u0026 community, 25 against 6" ], "also": null, "goodFor": "Agents doing social listening and brand monitoring across several networks, where a third-party source is acceptable.", "slug": "xpoz-mcp", "watchFor": "About 238 KB of tool definitions" } ], "history": { "metricool": [ { "causes": [ "method" ], "date": "2026-10-27", "delta": 0.1, "from": 38.3, "fromGrade": "E", "to": 38.4, "toGrade": "E" }, { "causes": [ "method" ], "date": "2026-10-08", "delta": -0.4, "from": 38.7, "fromGrade": "E", "to": 38.3, "toGrade": "E" } ], "xpoz-mcp": null }, "job": { "capability": "social.analytics", "name": "Social analytics" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ayrshare-vs-metricool.json", "title": "Ayrshare API + MCP vs Metricool API + MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ayrshare-vs-metricool" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blotato-vs-metricool.json", "title": "Blotato vs Metricool API + MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blotato-vs-metricool" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/buffer-vs-metricool.json", "title": "Buffer API + MCP vs Metricool API + MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/buffer-vs-metricool" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bundle-social-vs-metricool.json", "title": "bundle.social vs Metricool API + MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bundle-social-vs-metricool" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/late-vs-metricool.json", "title": "Zernio (formerly Late) API + MCP vs Metricool API + MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/late-vs-metricool" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-mixpost.json", "title": "Metricool API + MCP vs Mixpost API + MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-mixpost" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-oneup.json", "title": "Metricool API + MCP vs OneUp API + MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-oneup" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-post-bridge.json", "title": "Metricool API + MCP vs Post Bridge API + MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-post-bridge" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-postiz.json", "title": "Metricool API + MCP vs Postiz API + MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-postiz" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-publer.json", "title": "Metricool API + MCP vs Publer API + MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-publer" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-repostit.json", "title": "Metricool API + MCP vs Repostit", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-repostit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-typefully.json", "title": "Metricool API + MCP vs Typefully", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-typefully" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-upload-post.json", "title": "Metricool API + MCP vs Upload-Post API + MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-upload-post" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ayrshare-vs-xpoz-mcp.json", "title": "Ayrshare API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ayrshare-vs-xpoz-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blotato-vs-xpoz-mcp.json", "title": "Blotato vs Xpoz MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blotato-vs-xpoz-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/buffer-vs-xpoz-mcp.json", "title": "Buffer API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/buffer-vs-xpoz-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bundle-social-vs-xpoz-mcp.json", "title": "bundle.social vs Xpoz MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bundle-social-vs-xpoz-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/late-vs-xpoz-mcp.json", "title": "Zernio (formerly Late) API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/late-vs-xpoz-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-sprout-social.json", "title": "Metricool API + MCP vs Sprout Social API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-sprout-social" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-twitterapi-io-mcp.json", "title": "Metricool API + MCP vs TwitterAPI.io MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-twitterapi-io-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-x-mcp.json", "title": "Metricool API + MCP vs X MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-x-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mixpost-vs-xpoz-mcp.json", "title": "Mixpost API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mixpost-vs-xpoz-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/oneup-vs-xpoz-mcp.json", "title": "OneUp API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/oneup-vs-xpoz-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/post-bridge-vs-xpoz-mcp.json", "title": "Post Bridge API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/post-bridge-vs-xpoz-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/postiz-vs-xpoz-mcp.json", "title": "Postiz API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/postiz-vs-xpoz-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/publer-vs-xpoz-mcp.json", "title": "Publer API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/publer-vs-xpoz-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/socialcannon-vs-xpoz-mcp.json", "title": "SocialCannon vs Xpoz MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/socialcannon-vs-xpoz-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/sprout-social-vs-xpoz-mcp.json", "title": "Sprout Social API vs Xpoz MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/sprout-social-vs-xpoz-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/twitterapi-io-mcp-vs-xpoz-mcp.json", "title": "TwitterAPI.io MCP vs Xpoz MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/twitterapi-io-mcp-vs-xpoz-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/upload-post-vs-xpoz-mcp.json", "title": "Upload-Post API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/upload-post-vs-xpoz-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/x-mcp-vs-xpoz-mcp.json", "title": "X MCP vs Xpoz MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/x-mcp-vs-xpoz-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-socialcannon.json", "title": "Metricool API + MCP vs SocialCannon", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-socialcannon" } ], "panel": null, "scores": [ { "by": 15, "edge": "metricool", "key": "reliability", "metricool": 35, "name": "Reliability", "weight": 16, "xpoz-mcp": 20 }, { "key": "performance", "name": "Performance", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 8, "edge": "xpoz-mcp", "key": "schema", "metricool": 56, "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "weight": 13, "xpoz-mcp": 64 }, { "by": 24, "edge": "xpoz-mcp", "key": "ergonomics", "metricool": 39, "name": "Agent ergonomics", "weight": 13, "xpoz-mcp": 63 }, { "by": 11, "edge": "metricool", "key": "security", "metricool": 48, "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "weight": 14, "xpoz-mcp": 37 }, { "by": 0, "edge": "", "key": "payments", "metricool": 30, "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "weight": 10, "xpoz-mcp": 30 }, { "key": "tasks", "name": "Task success", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 19, "edge": "xpoz-mcp", "key": "maintenance", "metricool": 6, "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "weight": 7, "xpoz-mcp": 25 }, { "by": 32, "edge": "metricool", "key": "transparency", "metricool": 61, "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "weight": 7, "xpoz-mcp": 29 } ], "summary": "Xpoz MCP scores 39.6 (E) on agent readiness against Metricool API + MCP's 38.4 (E), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Metricool API + MCP leads on reliability, security \u0026 auth and transparency \u0026 trust. Both do social analytics.", "tasks": null, "tutorials": [], "verdicts": { "metricool": "Hosted MCP with OAuth and separate mcp:read and mcp:write scopes, on every plan including Free. REST API only on Advanced ($67 a month) and Custom.", "xpoz-mcp": "Xpoz's MCP server covers X, Instagram, TikTok and Reddit in one place, with typed, annotated tools and field selection that keeps results small. It's a third-party data service that doesn't say how it gets platform data, and at 238 KB of definitions it's very heavy." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-xpoz-mcp", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-xpoz-mcp.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-xpoz-mcp.md", "mcp": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-xpoz-mcp.min.md" }, "markdown": "Xpoz MCP scores 39.6 (E) on agent readiness against Metricool API + MCP's 38.4 (E), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Metricool API + MCP leads on reliability, security \u0026 auth and transparency \u0026 trust. Both do social analytics.\n\n- Metricool API + MCP: grade E, 38.4/100, rank #1360 of 1510. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/metricool.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/metricool.json\n- Xpoz MCP: grade E, 39.6/100, rank #1339 of 1510. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/xpoz-mcp.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/xpoz-mcp.json\n- Best social media posting and scheduling APIs for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/social-media/index.md\n- All 163 social comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/social-media/index.md\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### Metricool API + MCP (E)\n\nGood for: Reporting agents that read analytics and ad results, and for drafting posts for human review on a free account.\n\nAhead on:\n- Reliability, 35 against 20\n- Security \u0026 auth, 48 against 37\n- Transparency \u0026 trust, 61 against 29\n\nWatch for: REST API only on Advanced ($67 a month) and Custom\n\n### Xpoz MCP (E)\n\nGood for: Agents doing social listening and brand monitoring across several networks, where a third-party source is acceptable.\n\nAhead on:\n- Schema \u0026 documentation, 64 against 56\n- Agent ergonomics, 63 against 39\n- Maintenance \u0026 community, 25 against 6\n\nWatch for: About 238 KB of tool definitions\n\n\n## Why the edge\n\n### Transparency \u0026 trust: Metricool API + MCP +32\n\n- Metricool API + MCP (61): Closed service with published terms from METRICOOL SOFTWARE, SL of Madrid, part of the team.blue group (15). Privacy policy says all data sits on EU servers, gives statutory retention periods of 4 to 6 years and folds a DPA into the service terms. A signed DPA is available on request from legal@metricool.com, with deletion or return of data when the contract ends. Processors are named only by category (22). No deprecation policy or dated notices found (0). Data location stated, subprocessors not named (10).\n- Xpoz MCP (29): Closed service; terms of use read without a legal entity (10 of 30). Data handling not read (5 of 30). No deprecation policy (0). Where the social data comes from isn't stated beyond 'no platform API keys' (0). 10 + 5 + 0 + 0 = 15.\n\n### Agent ergonomics: Xpoz MCP +24\n\n- Metricool API + MCP (39): The help centre's MCP basics page lists six hosted tools, four that read (metrics, analytics, best time, scheduled posts) and two that write (create and update a scheduled post). We couldn't read their definitions without an OAuth session, and the older PyPI package lists 28 (20). Analytics take date ranges. We didn't verify pagination or field selection (8). Two documented error cases, no codes an agent can act on (5). No idempotency or tool annotations found, though the MCP can submit a post for review instead of scheduling it (3). No SDKs, and three values per REST call (3).\n- Xpoz MCP (63): 52 tools totalling about 238 KB (5). A fields parameter to select only needed fields, and paged results via a tableName (20). No documented errors (3 of 20). All annotated, 49 read-only (20). SDKs and a CLI (15). 5 + 20 + 3 + 20 + 15 = 63.\n\n### Maintenance \u0026 community: Xpoz MCP +19\n\n- Metricool API + MCP (6): No dated API or MCP change found. The PyPI server mcp-metricool is still at 1.1.9 from 7 October 2025 (0). No releases or dated changelog entries in the last 90 days (0). No public API changelog. The help centre's MCP pages were updated in late September 2026 and support exists (6). No official SDKs or registry entry (0). The GitHub repo the help centre names isn't public. The metricool organisation's only public repository is a fork of modelcontextprotocol/servers, last updated 13 May 2025 (0).\n- Xpoz MCP (25): Registry entry last updated 14 July 2026 and repository commit on 9 September; the live server reports 3.0.0 (10). No dated releases in 90 days (0). Issues not read (0). Official registry entry ai.xpoz/social-insights (15). Docker packaging only (0). 10 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 25. Registry presence read from Anchor Terminal's own daily import of the official MCP registry (/api/v1/registry.json, 6 November 2026), not the registry's API.\n\n### Reliability: Metricool API + MCP +15\n\n- Metricool API + MCP (35): A status page at status.metricool.com, per the 30 September check (20). Its robots.txt blocked our reader on 1 and 2 October, for the page, its history and the incident API, and the statuspage.io mirror too, so we have no readable history. That's our limit, not proof of a clean record. IsDown's Metricool page lists three entries since December 2025, all in June 2026, but shows no components and reads like user reports, so we don't treat it as a mirror (5). No rate limits published. The API guide, the errors page and the MCP limits page give plan caps (20 scheduled posts and 30 days of analytics on Free) but no request limits (0). No 429 or retry guidance found (0). No SLA found (0). The API and MCP aren't labelled beta (10).\n- Xpoz MCP (20): No status page found (0). No history (5). Credit allowances, no rate limits found (5 of 15). No retry guidance (0). No SLA (0). Not labelled beta (10). 0 + 5 + 5 + 0 + 0 + 10 = 20.\n\n### Security \u0026 auth: Metricool API + MCP +11\n\n- Metricool API + MCP (48): REST takes one account token in the X-Mc-Auth header, not the query string, plus userId and blogId. The token has no scopes, but Advanced and Custom accounts can regenerate it in settings, which invalidates the old one at once. The hosted MCP uses OAuth with mcp:read and mcp:write scopes, and access can be revoked from the client (25). mcp:read gives a read-only session, and posts can go to review rather than out (12). Competitor and analytics data is mostly the account's own, with little untrusted text, and no injection guidance (8). No audit log found (0). The privacy policy names a DPO. No security.txt, disclosure route or certification found (3).\n- Xpoz MCP (37): One API key (20 of 30). 49 of 52 tools read-only (15 of 20). Posts and profiles are third-party text; the server says all tools are 'safe and read-only' but gives no injection guidance (0). No audit log (0). No security programme found (2 of 20). 20 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 2 = 37.\n\n### Schema \u0026 documentation: Xpoz MCP +8\n\n- Metricool API + MCP (56): OpenAPI 3.0 at app.metricool.com/api/swagger.json covering 553 paths, per the 30 September check. On 1 and 2 October app.metricool.com answered our reader's robots.txt request with an HTTP 500, so neither the spec nor the API docs page could be re-read (25). llms.txt on the help centre, re-read on 2 October (10). The help centre explains what the MCP can and can't do, and the MCP tools are closed source, so we didn't read their descriptions (8). Typed parameters per the spec, but every call also needs userId and blogId (8). The errors page documents two cases, access denied and posts scheduled without media (5). No API or MCP changelog. The only changelog in the help centre's llms.txt is for the Looker Studio connector (0).\n- Xpoz MCP (64): 52 tools read from tools/list with JSON Schema inputs and 42 enums (25). No llms.txt read (0). Server instructions explain paging and field selection (16 of 20). Typed inputs with enums (15). Examples on the home page (5 of 15). Registry 1.4.1 from July, server 3.0.0; no changelog (3 of 15). 25 + 0 + 16 + 15 + 5 + 3 = 64.\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | Metricool API + MCP | Xpoz MCP | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 35 | 20 | Metricool API + MCP +15 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 56 | 64 | Xpoz MCP +8 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 39 | 63 | Xpoz MCP +24 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 48 | 37 | Metricool API + MCP +11 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 30 | 30 | even |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 6 | 25 | Xpoz MCP +19 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 61 | 29 | Metricool API + MCP +32 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | -2 | 0 | |\n| **Total** | | **38.4 · E** | **39.6 · E** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | Metricool API + MCP | Xpoz MCP |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | HTTP API | MCP server |\n| Vendor | Metricool | XPOZ |\n| Hosted endpoint | `https://app.metricool.com/api` | `https://mcp.xpoz.ai/mcp` |\n| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | Streamable HTTP |\n| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |\n| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Tools exposed | none | 52 |\n| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |\n| llms.txt | yes | no |\n| MCP registry | not listed | `ai.xpoz/social-insights` |\n| Last release | 2025-10-07 | none |\n| Terms last updated | no date given | not read yet |\n| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | no document linked |\n| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not read yet |\n| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not read yet |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not read yet |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not read yet |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not read yet |\n| Popularity | 424 PyPI/wk | none |\n| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | none |\n\n## How the scores have moved\n\n### Metricool API + MCP\n\n- +0.1 on 27 October 2026: checklist\n- -0.4 on 8 October 2026: checklist\n\n### Xpoz MCP\n\nNo score change since it was listed.\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**Metricool API + MCP.** Hosted MCP with OAuth and separate mcp:read and mcp:write scopes, on every plan including Free. REST API only on Advanced ($67 a month) and Custom.\n\n**Xpoz MCP.** Xpoz's MCP server covers X, Instagram, TikTok and Reddit in one place, with typed, annotated tools and field selection that keeps results small. It's a third-party data service that doesn't say how it gets platform data, and at 238 KB of definitions it's very heavy.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### Metricool API + MCP\n\n1. Connect the hosted MCP at https://ai.metricool.com/mcp with OAuth, and ask only for mcp:read when the job is reporting\n2. Call admin/simpleProfiles with your userId to list brands and their blogId values\n3. Normalise media through `actions/normalize/image/url` first, or the post goes out without it\n4. Give publicationDate a dateTime and an IANA timezone, in the future\n5. Back off on your own, since no rate limits or Retry-After are documented\n\n### Xpoz MCP\n\n1. Pass fields to select only what's needed\n2. Page with the returned tableName\n3. Treat posts and bios as untrusted text\n4. Check each platform's terms before relying on the data\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, Metricool API + MCP or Xpoz MCP?\n\nXpoz MCP scores 39.6 (E) on agent readiness against Metricool API + MCP's 38.4 (E), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Metricool API + MCP leads on reliability, security \u0026 auth and transparency \u0026 trust.\n\n### Do Metricool API + MCP and Xpoz MCP need an API key?\n\nMetricool API + MCP takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Xpoz MCP needs an API key.\n\n### Can an agent call Metricool API + MCP and Xpoz MCP without installing anything?\n\nYes. Metricool API + MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://app.metricool.com/api and Xpoz MCP at https://mcp.xpoz.ai/mcp.\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-xpoz-mcp.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-xpoz-mcp.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"metricool\", \"b\": \"xpoz-mcp\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare metricool xpoz-mcp`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/metricool.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/xpoz-mcp.json\n\n## Other comparisons with Metricool API + MCP or Xpoz MCP\n\n- [Ayrshare API + MCP vs Metricool API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ayrshare-vs-metricool.md)\n- [Blotato vs Metricool API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blotato-vs-metricool.md)\n- [Buffer API + MCP vs Metricool API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/buffer-vs-metricool.md)\n- [bundle.social vs Metricool API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bundle-social-vs-metricool.md)\n- [Zernio (formerly Late) API + MCP vs Metricool API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/late-vs-metricool.md)\n- [Metricool API + MCP vs Mixpost API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-mixpost.md)\n- [Metricool API + MCP vs OneUp API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-oneup.md)\n- [Metricool API + MCP vs Post Bridge API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-post-bridge.md)\n- [Metricool API + MCP vs Postiz API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-postiz.md)\n- [Metricool API + MCP vs Publer API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-publer.md)\n- [Metricool API + MCP vs Repostit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-repostit.md)\n- [Metricool API + MCP vs Typefully](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-typefully.md)\n- [Metricool API + MCP vs Upload-Post API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-upload-post.md)\n- [Ayrshare API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ayrshare-vs-xpoz-mcp.md)\n- [Blotato vs Xpoz MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blotato-vs-xpoz-mcp.md)\n- [Buffer API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/buffer-vs-xpoz-mcp.md)\n- [bundle.social vs Xpoz MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bundle-social-vs-xpoz-mcp.md)\n- [Zernio (formerly Late) API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/late-vs-xpoz-mcp.md)\n- [Metricool API + MCP vs Sprout Social API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-sprout-social.md)\n- [Metricool API + MCP vs TwitterAPI.io MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-twitterapi-io-mcp.md)\n- [Metricool API + MCP vs X MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-x-mcp.md)\n- [Mixpost API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mixpost-vs-xpoz-mcp.md)\n- [OneUp API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/oneup-vs-xpoz-mcp.md)\n- [Post Bridge API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/post-bridge-vs-xpoz-mcp.md)\n- [Postiz API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/postiz-vs-xpoz-mcp.md)\n- [Publer API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/publer-vs-xpoz-mcp.md)\n- [SocialCannon vs Xpoz MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/socialcannon-vs-xpoz-mcp.md)\n- [Sprout Social API vs Xpoz MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/sprout-social-vs-xpoz-mcp.md)\n- [TwitterAPI.io MCP vs Xpoz MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/twitterapi-io-mcp-vs-xpoz-mcp.md)\n- [Upload-Post API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/upload-post-vs-xpoz-mcp.md)\n- [X MCP vs Xpoz MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/x-mcp-vs-xpoz-mcp.md)\n- [Metricool API + MCP vs SocialCannon](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-socialcannon.md)\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "attributionRequired": true, "credit": "CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link the page or API address you took it from (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-11-08", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.7", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "terms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "Metricool API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP", "url": "" } ], "description": "Xpoz MCP scores 39.6 (E) to Metricool's 38.4 (E) for social analytics. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "Metricool API + MCP E 38.4", "Xpoz MCP E 39.6", "scores" ], "h1": "Metricool API + MCP vs Xpoz MCP", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/default.png", "path": "/compare/metricool-vs-xpoz-mcp", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "Metricool vs Xpoz MCP for AI agents in 2026: scores and prices", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-11-07", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/metricool-vs-xpoz-mcp" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 4000, "slim": 2180 }, "version": 1 }