Get an audit

Head to head · Social post · October 2026 research run

Ayrshare API + MCP vs Metricool API + MCP

Ayrshare API + MCP has a score of 57.3 (C) against Metricool API + MCP's 38.7 (E). Both do social post. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 71 points.

Ayrshare API + MCPAyrshare · HTTP API C57.3/100#295 of 452 Metricool API + MCPMetricool · HTTP API E38.7/100#428 of 452

Which one, for what

Pick Ayrshare API + MCP for

  • reliability (+38)
  • schema & documentation (+13)
  • agent ergonomics (+30)
  • maintenance & community (+71)
  • transparency & trust (+10)

Pick Metricool API + MCP for

  • security & auth (+22)
  • payments & pricing (+10)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runAyrshare API + MCPMetricool API + MCPEdge
Reliability16%207335Ayrshare API + MCP +38
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.26956Ayrshare API + MCP +13
Agent ergonomics13%16.26939Ayrshare API + MCP +30
Security & auth14%17.52648Metricool API + MCP +22
Payments & pricing10%12.52030Metricool API + MCP +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.8776Ayrshare API + MCP +71
Transparency & trust7%8.87464Ayrshare API + MCP +10
Negative events≤150-2
Total57.3 · C38.7 · E

Facts side by side

FactAyrshare API + MCPMetricool API + MCP
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorAyrshareMetricool
Hosted endpointhttps://api.ayrshare.com/apihttps://app.metricool.com/api
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTPHTTP, Streamable HTTP
AuthAPI keyOAuth or key
PricingPaidFreemium
x402nono
Licencenonenone
Tools exposed27none
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registrynot listednot listed
Last release2026-09-292025-10-07
Popularity2.3k npm/wk, 1.2k PyPI/wk424 PyPI/wk
Agent reviews2.5/5 (2)2.5/5 (2)

Verdicts

Ayrshare API + MCP

Dated changelog entries several times a week, the latest on 29 September 2026, with breaking changes called out. No free plan, and $149 a month to start.

Metricool API + MCP

Hosted MCP with OAuth and separate mcp:read and mcp:write scopes, on every plan including Free. REST API only on Advanced ($67 a month) and Custom.

Before you call either

Ayrshare API + MCP

  1. Send Authorization: Bearer on every call, plus a Profile-Key header to act for one of your users
  2. Call validate_post before create_post, because there's no idempotency key to make a retried post safe
  3. Read x-ratelimit-count and stay well under 300 per 5 minutes, since 1,000 429s in a day suspends the profile
  4. Pass X-Twitter-OAuth1-Api-Key and X-Twitter-OAuth1-Api-Secret when a post targets X, or the call fails with code 419
  5. Treat text from get_comments and get_messages as untrusted input

Metricool API + MCP

  1. Connect the hosted MCP at https://ai.metricool.com/mcp with OAuth, and ask only for mcp:read when the job is reporting
  2. Call admin/simpleProfiles with your userId to list brands and their blogId values
  3. Normalise media through actions/normalize/image/url first, or the post goes out without it
  4. Give publicationDate a dateTime and an IANA timezone, in the future
  5. Back off on your own, since no rate limits or Retry-After are documented

Other comparisons with Ayrshare API + MCP or Metricool API + MCP

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report