Head to head · Voice speech to speech · October 2026 research run
GPT-Live vs Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface)
GPT-Live scores 66.8 (B) on agent readiness against Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface)'s 56.7 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface) leads on payments & pricing. Both do voice speech to speech.
Best conversational voice-agent APIs · All 184 voice agents comparisons
Which one, for what
GPT-Live B
Best for Teams who want a voice front end that keeps talking while a separate backend reasons and runs tools, with WebRTC, WebSocket and SIP from one vendor and a flat per-minute voice price.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 62 against 55
- Agent ergonomics, 76 against 66
- Security & auth, 66 against 27
- Maintenance & community, 82 against 65
- Transparency & trust, 76 against 61
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 2.0 out of 5
Watch for
openai.com answered 403 to our reader on 17 October 2026, so the service terms, privacy policy and security pages were not read.
Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface) C
Best for Consumer and coaching products where the caller's tone matters and English is enough on EVI 3.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 37 against 20
Watch for
Hume ends access to the TTS and EVI APIs on 13 November 2026 and deletes account data after that date
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | GPT-Live | Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface) | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 62 | 55 | GPT-Live +7 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 87 | 90 | Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface) +3 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 76 | 66 | GPT-Live +10 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 66 | 27 | GPT-Live +39 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 37 | Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface) +17 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 82 | 65 | GPT-Live +17 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 76 | 61 | GPT-Live +15 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 66.8/100 | C 56.7/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | GPT-Live | Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface) |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | OpenAI | Hume AI |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.openai.com/v1/live/sessions | https://api.hume.ai/v0/evi |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service. The service terms on openai.com were not read. The Python SDK is Apache-2.0, and the OpenAPI description and the OpenAI Live Console sample are MIT | MIT (SDKs) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-16 | 2026-08-18 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | 2026-10-05 |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | 2025-02-25 |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | yes |
| Popularity | none | 180 stars, 79k npm/wk, 24k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | 2/5 (2) |
Verdicts
GPT-Live
A generally available full-duplex voice API with a typed OpenAPI contract, published concurrency limits and a flat $0.05 a minute for the voice session. Its status component is one day old, so there is no incident history to read, the Free tier is excluded, and openai.com refused our reader, so the terms and privacy policy were not read.
Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface)
Speech-language model that reads the caller's tone and answers with matching prosody. One account-wide key, sent in the WebSocket and Twilio webhook URLs. Hume ends API access on 13 November 2026.
Before you call either
GPT-Live
- Create sessions on a server with the project API key. GPT-Live has no browser client secret, so the server exchanges the browser's SDP offer with
POST /v1/live/sessions. - Choose
delegation.typeat creation. Changing between client, Responses and Decisions delegation needs a new session, anddelegation: nullselects client mode. - After
session.started, listen forerrorwith coderesponses_validation_failed. Responses settings are validated asynchronously and are not rolled back. - Do not retry an outbound SIP
POST /v1/live/sessionsafter a timeout. Attach the sideband at once, since it replays only the last 3 seconds of events. - Keep the transport open until
session.closedto read the finalusage.seconds. A WebRTC session bills 15 seconds at creation, credited once it runs.
Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface)
- Create a config with a voice first, EVI 3 has no default
- Pick a Claude, GPT, Gemini or Moonshot supplemental LLM if the agent needs tools, since Hume's own model can't call them
- Mint 30-minute access tokens server-side so the API key never reaches a client URL
- Turn on 'Do not retain data' and 'Do not use for training' at app.hume.ai before sensitive calls
- Reconnect with the chat group ID before the 30-minute session cap, and on E0700 close an open chat before starting another
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, GPT-Live or Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface)?
GPT-Live scores 66.8 (B) on agent readiness against Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface)'s 56.7 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface) leads on payments & pricing.
Do GPT-Live and Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface) need an API key?
GPT-Live needs an API key. Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface) takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call GPT-Live and Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface) without installing anything?
Yes. GPT-Live has a hosted endpoint at https://api.openai.com/v1/live/sessions and Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface) at https://api.hume.ai/v0/evi.
Other comparisons with GPT-Live or Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface)
- AssemblyAI Voice Agent API vs GPT-Live
- AssemblyAI Voice Agent API vs Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface)
- Bland AI API + MCP vs GPT-Live
- Bland AI API + MCP vs Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface)
- Bolna API + MCP vs GPT-Live
- Bolna API + MCP vs Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface)
- Deepgram Voice Agent API vs GPT-Live
- Deepgram Voice Agent API vs Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface)
- ElevenLabs Agents API + MCP vs GPT-Live
- ElevenLabs Agents API + MCP vs Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface)
- Gemini Live API vs GPT-Live
- Gemini Live API vs Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface)
- GPT-Live vs PlaceCall
- GPT-Live vs Synthflow API + MCP
- GPT-Live vs Vocily AI
- GPT-Live vs Vogent API
- Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface) vs LiveKit Agents
- Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface) vs OpenAI Realtime API
- Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface) vs Pipecat
- Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface) vs PlaceCall
- Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface) vs Retell AI API + MCP
- Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface) vs Synthflow API + MCP
- Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface) vs Ultravox Realtime API
- Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface) vs Vapi API + MCP
- Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface) vs Vocily AI
- Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface) vs Vogent API
- CueLight vs Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface)
- Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface) vs Pipecat PhoneLLM
- GPT-Live vs LiveKit Agents
- GPT-Live vs OpenAI Realtime API
- GPT-Live vs Pipecat
- GPT-Live vs Retell AI API + MCP
- GPT-Live vs Ultravox Realtime API
- GPT-Live vs Vapi API + MCP
- GPT-Live vs Pipecat PhoneLLM
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/gpt-live-vs-hume-evi.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/gpt-live.json·/api/v1/tools/hume-evi.json - From a terminal
anchor compare gpt-live hume-evi(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "gpt-live", "b": "hume-evi"}at/mcp, no key