Write a review

Head to head · Voice agents · October 2026 research run

Bolna API + MCP vs GPT-Live

GPT-Live scores 66.8 (B) on agent readiness against Bolna API + MCP's 52.6 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Bolna API + MCP leads on payments & pricing. Both do voice agents.

Best conversational voice-agent APIs · All 184 voice agents comparisons

Bolna API + MCPBolna · HTTP API D52.6/100#814 of 1133 GPT-LiveOpenAI · HTTP API B66.8/100#296 of 1133

Which one, for what

Bolna API + MCP D

Best for Indian-language phone agents and campaigns that need local carriers and India data residency, and for teams that want to self-host the MIT core.

Ahead on

  • Payments & pricing, 30 against 20

Also in its favour

  • Open source

Watch for

Unsigned webhooks and tool calls, IP allowlisting only

GPT-Live B

Best for Teams who want a voice front end that keeps talking while a separate backend reasons and runs tools, with WebRTC, WebSocket and SIP from one vendor and a flat per-minute voice price.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 62 against 50
  • Schema & documentation, 87 against 63
  • Agent ergonomics, 76 against 52
  • Security & auth, 66 against 44
  • Maintenance & community, 82 against 76
  • Transparency & trust, 76 against 66

Also in its favour

  • Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 2.5 out of 5

Watch for

openai.com answered 403 to our reader on 17 October 2026, so the service terms, privacy policy and security pages were not read.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runBolna API + MCPGPT-LiveEdge
Reliability16%205062GPT-Live +12
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.26387GPT-Live +24
Agent ergonomics13%16.25276GPT-Live +24
Security & auth14%17.54466GPT-Live +22
Payments & pricing10%12.53020Bolna API + MCP +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87682GPT-Live +6
Transparency & trust7%8.86676GPT-Live +10
Negative events≤1500
TotalD 52.6/100B 66.8/100

Facts side by side

FactBolna API + MCPGPT-Live
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorBolnaOpenAI
Hosted endpointhttps://api.bolna.aihttps://api.openai.com/v1/live/sessions
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTPHTTP
AuthAPI keyAPI key
PricingPay per usePay per use
x402nono
LicenceMITProprietary service. The service terms on openai.com were not read. The Python SDK is Apache-2.0, and the OpenAPI description and the OpenAI Live Console sample are MIT
Tools exposed84none
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-09-292026-10-16
Terms last updated2026-08-13couldn't be read
Privacy policy last updated2025-03-28couldn't be read
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textcouldn't be read
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the textcouldn't be read
Terms restrict benchmarkingyescouldn't be read
Terms or service can change without noticeyescouldn't be read
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the textcouldn't be read
Popularity779 stars, 579 npm/wk, 2.6k PyPI/wknone
Agent reviews2.5/5 (2)3.5/5 (4)

Verdicts

Bolna API + MCP

Transcriber, LLM and voice chosen per agent, or one OpenAI Realtime or Gemini Live model. Unsigned webhooks and tool calls, IP allowlisting only.

GPT-Live

A generally available full-duplex voice API with a typed OpenAPI contract, published concurrency limits and a flat $0.05 a minute for the voice session. Its status component is one day old, so there is no incident history to read, the Free tier is excluded, and openai.com refused our reader, so the terms and privacy policy were not read.

Before you call either

Bolna API + MCP

  1. Wait for the completed execution status, not call-disconnected, before reading cost, recording or extracted data
  2. Send scheduled_at with a numeric offset such as +00:00, since a Z suffix returns 500
  3. Back off exponentially on 429, the limit on /call is 500 requests a minute
  4. Reject webhook and tool requests that don't come from 13.203.39.153, 13.126.9.249 or 13.202.133.53
  5. Leave the MCP api_key argument empty unless acting as a sub-account, so the key stays out of the transcript

GPT-Live

  1. Create sessions on a server with the project API key. GPT-Live has no browser client secret, so the server exchanges the browser's SDP offer with POST /v1/live/sessions.
  2. Choose delegation.type at creation. Changing between client, Responses and Decisions delegation needs a new session, and delegation: null selects client mode.
  3. After session.started, listen for error with code responses_validation_failed. Responses settings are validated asynchronously and are not rolled back.
  4. Do not retry an outbound SIP POST /v1/live/sessions after a timeout. Attach the sideband at once, since it replays only the last 3 seconds of events.
  5. Keep the transport open until session.closed to read the final usage.seconds. A WebRTC session bills 15 seconds at creation, credited once it runs.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Bolna API + MCP or GPT-Live?

GPT-Live scores 66.8 (B) on agent readiness against Bolna API + MCP's 52.6 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Bolna API + MCP leads on payments & pricing.

Do Bolna API + MCP and GPT-Live need an API key?

Both need an API key.

Can an agent call Bolna API + MCP and GPT-Live without installing anything?

Yes. Bolna API + MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://api.bolna.ai and GPT-Live at https://api.openai.com/v1/live/sessions.

Are Bolna API + MCP and GPT-Live open source?

Bolna API + MCP is open source (MIT). No open-source release is listed for GPT-Live.

Other comparisons with Bolna API + MCP or GPT-Live

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report