Head to head · Voice agents · October 2026 research run
AssemblyAI Voice Agent API vs GPT-Live
GPT-Live scores 66.8 (B) on agent readiness against AssemblyAI Voice Agent API's 64.4 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. AssemblyAI Voice Agent API leads on payments & pricing. Both do voice agents.
Best conversational voice-agent APIs · All 184 voice agents comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for A developer who wants one managed pipeline at a flat rate and is content with AssemblyAI's own speech models and voices, with an optional model of their own.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 20
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
No number is published for the concurrent-session limit that the concurrency_exceeded error enforces
GPT-Live B
Best for Teams who want a voice front end that keeps talking while a separate backend reasons and runs tools, with WebRTC, WebSocket and SIP from one vendor and a flat per-minute voice price.
Ahead on
- Maintenance & community, 82 against 64
- Transparency & trust, 76 against 66
Watch for
openai.com answered 403 to our reader on 17 October 2026, so the service terms, privacy policy and security pages were not read.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | AssemblyAI Voice Agent API | GPT-Live | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 60 | 62 | GPT-Live +2 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 83 | 87 | GPT-Live +4 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 72 | 76 | GPT-Live +4 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 62 | 66 | GPT-Live +4 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 20 | AssemblyAI Voice Agent API +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 64 | 82 | GPT-Live +18 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 66 | 76 | GPT-Live +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 64.4/100 | B 66.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | AssemblyAI Voice Agent API | GPT-Live |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | AssemblyAI, Inc. | OpenAI |
| Hosted endpoint | wss://agents.assemblyai.com/v1/ws | https://api.openai.com/v1/live/sessions |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |
| Price for voice agents | $0.075 per minute of call | not published |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under AssemblyAI's Terms of Service. The two starter repositories on GitHub carry no licence file | Proprietary service. The service terms on openai.com were not read. The Python SDK is Apache-2.0, and the OpenAPI description and the OpenAI Live Console sample are MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-08-26 | 2026-10-16 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-07-01 | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-05-26 | couldn't be read |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | 3.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
AssemblyAI Voice Agent API
One $0.075 a minute rate covers speech-to-text, the managed model, speech output, recordings and hosting, and the socket has an AsyncAPI file, typed error codes and a 30-second resume window. No concurrent-session limit is published, the status page has no Voice Agent component, and phone calls are inbound only through a Twilio trunk the customer owns.
GPT-Live
A generally available full-duplex voice API with a typed OpenAPI contract, published concurrency limits and a flat $0.05 a minute for the voice session. Its status component is one day old, so there is no incident history to read, the Free tier is excluded, and openai.com refused our reader, so the terms and privacy policy were not read.
Before you call either
AssemblyAI Voice Agent API
- Send
session.endbefore closing the socket. Without it the session stays resumable, and billed, for 30 seconds - Retry only
at_capacity,concurrency_exceededandinternal_error, with backoff. Every other session error code is fatal - Send
tool.resultinside thereply.donehandler, not straight aftertool.call - Mint a one-time token with
GET /v1/tokenfor browser clients and never ship the API key to a page - Deduplicate webhooks on
event_id, and verifyX-AAI-Signatureagainst the raw body bytes because a 401 is not retried
GPT-Live
- Create sessions on a server with the project API key. GPT-Live has no browser client secret, so the server exchanges the browser's SDP offer with
POST /v1/live/sessions. - Choose
delegation.typeat creation. Changing between client, Responses and Decisions delegation needs a new session, anddelegation: nullselects client mode. - After
session.started, listen forerrorwith coderesponses_validation_failed. Responses settings are validated asynchronously and are not rolled back. - Do not retry an outbound SIP
POST /v1/live/sessionsafter a timeout. Attach the sideband at once, since it replays only the last 3 seconds of events. - Keep the transport open until
session.closedto read the finalusage.seconds. A WebRTC session bills 15 seconds at creation, credited once it runs.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, AssemblyAI Voice Agent API or GPT-Live?
GPT-Live scores 66.8 (B) on agent readiness against AssemblyAI Voice Agent API's 64.4 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. AssemblyAI Voice Agent API leads on payments & pricing.
Do AssemblyAI Voice Agent API and GPT-Live need an API key?
Both need an API key.
Can an agent call AssemblyAI Voice Agent API and GPT-Live without installing anything?
Yes. AssemblyAI Voice Agent API has a hosted endpoint at wss://agents.assemblyai.com/v1/ws and GPT-Live at https://api.openai.com/v1/live/sessions.
Other comparisons with AssemblyAI Voice Agent API or GPT-Live
- AssemblyAI Voice Agent API vs Bland AI API + MCP
- AssemblyAI Voice Agent API vs Bolna API + MCP
- AssemblyAI Voice Agent API vs Deepgram Voice Agent API
- AssemblyAI Voice Agent API vs ElevenLabs Agents API + MCP
- AssemblyAI Voice Agent API vs Gemini Live API
- AssemblyAI Voice Agent API vs Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface)
- AssemblyAI Voice Agent API vs LiveKit Agents
- AssemblyAI Voice Agent API vs OpenAI Realtime API
- AssemblyAI Voice Agent API vs Pipecat
- AssemblyAI Voice Agent API vs PlaceCall
- AssemblyAI Voice Agent API vs Retell AI API + MCP
- AssemblyAI Voice Agent API vs Synthflow API + MCP
- AssemblyAI Voice Agent API vs Ultravox Realtime API
- AssemblyAI Voice Agent API vs Vapi API + MCP
- AssemblyAI Voice Agent API vs Vocily AI
- AssemblyAI Voice Agent API vs Vogent API
- Bland AI API + MCP vs GPT-Live
- Bolna API + MCP vs GPT-Live
- Deepgram Voice Agent API vs GPT-Live
- ElevenLabs Agents API + MCP vs GPT-Live
- Gemini Live API vs GPT-Live
- GPT-Live vs PlaceCall
- GPT-Live vs Synthflow API + MCP
- GPT-Live vs Vocily AI
- GPT-Live vs Vogent API
- AssemblyAI Voice Agent API vs CueLight
- AssemblyAI Voice Agent API vs Pipecat PhoneLLM
- GPT-Live vs Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface)
- GPT-Live vs LiveKit Agents
- GPT-Live vs OpenAI Realtime API
- GPT-Live vs Pipecat
- GPT-Live vs Retell AI API + MCP
- GPT-Live vs Ultravox Realtime API
- GPT-Live vs Vapi API + MCP
- GPT-Live vs Pipecat PhoneLLM
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/assemblyai-voice-agent-vs-gpt-live.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/assemblyai-voice-agent.json·/api/v1/tools/gpt-live.json - From a terminal
anchor compare assemblyai-voice-agent gpt-live(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "assemblyai-voice-agent", "b": "gpt-live"}at/mcp, no key