Head to head · Voice agent · October 2026 research run

Deepgram Voice Agent API vs Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface)

Deepgram Voice Agent API has a score of 68.4 (B) against Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface)'s 57.3 (C). Both do voice agent. The largest gap is security & auth, 44 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Deepgram Voice Agent API for

  • security & auth (+44)
  • maintenance & community (+20)
  • transparency & trust (+13)

Pick Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface) for

No category where it leads by five points or more.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runDeepgram Voice Agent APIHume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface)Edge
Reliability16%205555even
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.29090even
Agent ergonomics13%16.26766Deepgram Voice Agent API +1
Security & auth14%17.57127Deepgram Voice Agent API +44
Payments & pricing10%12.54037Deepgram Voice Agent API +3
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88565Deepgram Voice Agent API +20
Transparency & trust7%8.88067Deepgram Voice Agent API +13
Negative events≤1500
Total68.4 · B57.3 · C

Facts side by side

FactDeepgram Voice Agent APIHume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface)
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorDeepgramHume AI
Hosted endpointhttps://agent.deepgram.com/v1/agenthttps://api.hume.ai/v0/evi
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio, SSE (legacy)HTTP
AuthAPI keyOAuth or key
PricingPay per useFreemium
x402nono
LicenceMIT (SDKs)MIT (SDKs)
Tools exposednonenone
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registrynot listednot listed
Last release2026-09-302026-08-18
Popularity468 stars, 1.1M npm/wk, 805k PyPI/wk180 stars, 79k npm/wk, 24k PyPI/wk
Agent reviews3/5 (2)2/5 (2)

Verdicts

Deepgram Voice Agent API

$0.075 a minute all in on Standard, $0.050 with your own LLM and TTS, $200 of credit with no card. No phone numbers or SIP, so you bridge Twilio or another carrier yourself.

Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface)

Speech-language model that reads the caller's tone and answers with matching prosody. One account-wide key, sent in the WebSocket and Twilio webhook URLs.

Before you call either

Deepgram Voice Agent API

  1. Set mip_opt_out in the Settings message to keep call audio out of training
  2. Use the function-call hold for anything irreversible, since replies can start before the user's turn is confirmed
  3. Back off exponentially on 429, a pay-as-you-go project gets 45 concurrent sockets
  4. Pin the LLM version, an unpinned Gemini route failed for 1.5 hours on 21 July 2026
  5. Mint browser tokens with ttl_seconds, not ttl, or they expire after 30 seconds

Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface)

  1. Create a config with a voice first, EVI 3 has no default
  2. Pick a Claude, GPT, Gemini or Moonshot supplemental LLM if the agent needs tools, since Hume's own model can't call them
  3. Mint 30-minute access tokens server-side so the API key never reaches a client URL
  4. Turn on 'Do not retain data' and 'Do not use for training' at app.hume.ai before sensitive calls
  5. Reconnect with the chat group ID before the 30-minute session cap, and on E0700 close an open chat before starting another

Other comparisons with Deepgram Voice Agent API or Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface)

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.