Head to head · Voice pipeline · October 2026 research run
CueLight vs Deepgram Voice Agent API
Deepgram Voice Agent API scores 68.1 (B) on agent readiness against CueLight's 48.8 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. CueLight leads on payments & pricing. Both do voice pipeline.
Best conversational voice-agent APIs · All 102 voice agents comparisons
Which one, for what
CueLight D
Best for A turn-detection component for teams assembling their own voice pipeline (OpenVoiceOS, Pipecat-style stacks), especially on small devices.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 40
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Open source
Watch for
English only, and the author does not plan other languages soon
Best for Developers who already run telephony (Twilio, Amazon Connect, Genesys, AudioCodes) and want a cheap managed pipeline with their choice of LLM.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 55 against 29
- Schema & documentation, 90 against 50
- Agent ergonomics, 67 against 61
- Security & auth, 71 against 50
- Maintenance & community, 85 against 46
- Transparency & trust, 77 against 54
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
- Runs on your own machine
Watch for
No phone numbers or SIP, so you bridge Twilio or another carrier yourself
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | CueLight | Deepgram Voice Agent API | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 29 | 55 | Deepgram Voice Agent API +26 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 50 | 90 | Deepgram Voice Agent API +40 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 61 | 67 | Deepgram Voice Agent API +6 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 50 | 71 | Deepgram Voice Agent API +21 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 40 | CueLight +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 46 | 85 | Deepgram Voice Agent API +39 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 54 | 77 | Deepgram Voice Agent API +23 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 48.8/100 | B 68.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | CueLight | Deepgram Voice Agent API |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | SDK + MCP | HTTP API |
| Vendor | sshah03 (individual developer, name not stated) | Deepgram |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://agent.deepgram.com/v1/agent |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio, SSE (legacy) | |
| Auth | None | API key |
| Pricing | Free | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT (SDKs) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-14 | 2026-09-30 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2026-08-06 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2021-10-26 |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Popularity | 10 stars | 468 stars, 1.1M npm/wk, 805k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
CueLight
CueLight gives a voice pipeline a local end-of-turn probability every 20 ms from audio alone, with a 1.9 MB model and Apache-2.0 weights. It is one day old, English only, installs from Git rather than PyPI, has no CI or changelog, and its accuracy figures are the author's own.
Deepgram Voice Agent API
$0.075 a minute all in on Standard, $0.050 with your own LLM and TTS, $200 of credit with no card. No phone numbers or SIP, so you bridge Twilio or another carrier yourself.
Before you call either
CueLight
- Feed 320 float32 samples at 16 kHz mono per
push. Resample first, or the call raises an AssertionError - Spell the preset as
snappyorcareful. Any other name silently uses default thresholds - Call
clear()before a new call or session. Passreset_on_turn_start=Falseif your pipeline already resets per turn - Pin weights by downloading them to a local folder and passing that path to
from_pretrained - Don't use it to identify speakers or clone voices. The training data's conditions forbid it
Deepgram Voice Agent API
- Set
mip_opt_outin the Settings message to keep call audio out of training - Use the function-call hold for anything irreversible, since replies can start before the user's turn is confirmed
- Back off exponentially on 429, a pay-as-you-go project gets 45 concurrent sockets
- Pin the LLM version, an unpinned Gemini route failed for 1.5 hours on 21 July 2026
- Mint browser tokens with
ttl_seconds, notttl, or they expire after 30 seconds
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, CueLight or Deepgram Voice Agent API?
Deepgram Voice Agent API scores 68.1 (B) on agent readiness against CueLight's 48.8 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. CueLight leads on payments & pricing.
Can an agent call CueLight and Deepgram Voice Agent API without installing anything?
No hosted endpoint is listed for CueLight. Deepgram Voice Agent API has a hosted endpoint at https://agent.deepgram.com/v1/agent.
Are CueLight and Deepgram Voice Agent API open source?
CueLight is open source (Apache-2.0). No open-source release is listed for Deepgram Voice Agent API.
Other comparisons with CueLight or Deepgram Voice Agent API
- AssemblyAI Voice Agent API vs Deepgram Voice Agent API
- Bland AI API + MCP vs Deepgram Voice Agent API
- Bolna API + MCP vs Deepgram Voice Agent API
- Deepgram Voice Agent API vs ElevenLabs Agents API + MCP
- Deepgram Voice Agent API vs Gemini Live API
- Deepgram Voice Agent API vs Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface)
- Deepgram Voice Agent API vs OpenAI Realtime API
- Deepgram Voice Agent API vs Retell AI API + MCP
- Deepgram Voice Agent API vs Synthflow API + MCP
- Deepgram Voice Agent API vs Ultravox Realtime API
- Deepgram Voice Agent API vs Vapi API + MCP
- Deepgram Voice Agent API vs Vocily AI
- Deepgram Voice Agent API vs Vogent API
- AssemblyAI Voice Agent API vs CueLight
- Bland AI API + MCP vs CueLight
- Bolna API + MCP vs CueLight
- CueLight vs ElevenLabs Agents API + MCP
- CueLight vs Hume EVI (Empathic Voice Interface)
- CueLight vs Retell AI API + MCP
- CueLight vs Synthflow API + MCP
- CueLight vs Vapi API + MCP
- CueLight vs Vocily AI
- CueLight vs Vogent API
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/cuelight-vs-deepgram-voice-agent.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/cuelight.json·/api/v1/tools/deepgram-voice-agent.json - From a terminal
anchor compare cuelight deepgram-voice-agent(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "cuelight", "b": "deepgram-voice-agent"}at/mcp, no key