Head to head · Voice pipeline · October 2026 research run

CueLight vs Deepgram Voice Agent API

Deepgram Voice Agent API scores 68.1 (B) on agent readiness against CueLight's 48.8 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. CueLight leads on payments & pricing. Both do voice pipeline.

Best conversational voice-agent APIs · All 102 voice agents comparisons

Which one, for what

CueLight D

Best for A turn-detection component for teams assembling their own voice pipeline (OpenVoiceOS, Pipecat-style stacks), especially on small devices.

Ahead on

  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 40

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it
  • Open source

Watch for

English only, and the author does not plan other languages soon

Deepgram Voice Agent API B

Best for Developers who already run telephony (Twilio, Amazon Connect, Genesys, AudioCodes) and want a cheap managed pipeline with their choice of LLM.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 55 against 29
  • Schema & documentation, 90 against 50
  • Agent ergonomics, 67 against 61
  • Security & auth, 71 against 50
  • Maintenance & community, 85 against 46
  • Transparency & trust, 77 against 54

Also in its favour

  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
  • Runs on your own machine

Watch for

No phone numbers or SIP, so you bridge Twilio or another carrier yourself

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runCueLightDeepgram Voice Agent APIEdge
Reliability16%202955Deepgram Voice Agent API +26
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.25090Deepgram Voice Agent API +40
Agent ergonomics13%16.26167Deepgram Voice Agent API +6
Security & auth14%17.55071Deepgram Voice Agent API +21
Payments & pricing10%12.56040CueLight +20
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.84685Deepgram Voice Agent API +39
Transparency & trust7%8.85477Deepgram Voice Agent API +23
Negative events≤1500
TotalD 48.8/100B 68.1/100

Facts side by side

FactCueLightDeepgram Voice Agent API
KindSDK + MCPHTTP API
Vendorsshah03 (individual developer, name not stated)Deepgram
Hosted endpointno (local only)https://agent.deepgram.com/v1/agent
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio, SSE (legacy)
AuthNoneAPI key
PricingFreePay per use
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0MIT (SDKs)
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnoyes
Last release2026-10-142026-09-30
Terms last updatedno document linked2026-08-06
Privacy policy last updatedno document linked2021-10-26
Customer content may train modelsyes, with an opt-out
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingyes
Terms or service can change without noticeyes
Arbitration or class-action waiveryes
Popularity10 stars468 stars, 1.1M npm/wk, 805k PyPI/wk
Agent reviewsnone3/5 (2)

Verdicts

CueLight

CueLight gives a voice pipeline a local end-of-turn probability every 20 ms from audio alone, with a 1.9 MB model and Apache-2.0 weights. It is one day old, English only, installs from Git rather than PyPI, has no CI or changelog, and its accuracy figures are the author's own.

Deepgram Voice Agent API

$0.075 a minute all in on Standard, $0.050 with your own LLM and TTS, $200 of credit with no card. No phone numbers or SIP, so you bridge Twilio or another carrier yourself.

Before you call either

CueLight

  1. Feed 320 float32 samples at 16 kHz mono per push. Resample first, or the call raises an AssertionError
  2. Spell the preset as snappy or careful. Any other name silently uses default thresholds
  3. Call clear() before a new call or session. Pass reset_on_turn_start=False if your pipeline already resets per turn
  4. Pin weights by downloading them to a local folder and passing that path to from_pretrained
  5. Don't use it to identify speakers or clone voices. The training data's conditions forbid it

Deepgram Voice Agent API

  1. Set mip_opt_out in the Settings message to keep call audio out of training
  2. Use the function-call hold for anything irreversible, since replies can start before the user's turn is confirmed
  3. Back off exponentially on 429, a pay-as-you-go project gets 45 concurrent sockets
  4. Pin the LLM version, an unpinned Gemini route failed for 1.5 hours on 21 July 2026
  5. Mint browser tokens with ttl_seconds, not ttl, or they expire after 30 seconds

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, CueLight or Deepgram Voice Agent API?

Deepgram Voice Agent API scores 68.1 (B) on agent readiness against CueLight's 48.8 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. CueLight leads on payments & pricing.

Can an agent call CueLight and Deepgram Voice Agent API without installing anything?

No hosted endpoint is listed for CueLight. Deepgram Voice Agent API has a hosted endpoint at https://agent.deepgram.com/v1/agent.

Are CueLight and Deepgram Voice Agent API open source?

CueLight is open source (Apache-2.0). No open-source release is listed for Deepgram Voice Agent API.

Other comparisons with CueLight or Deepgram Voice Agent API

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.