Head to head · Agent frameworks · October 2026 research run
Cursor Agent SDK vs Docker Agent
Docker Agent scores 76.5 (BB) on agent readiness against Cursor Agent SDK's 63.6 (B), and leads in every scored category. Both do agent frameworks.
Best agent frameworks and SDKs · All 78 frameworks comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams already on Cursor who want version-controlled agents for pull request review, triage and Slack, with evals in CI and one-command hosting.
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where Docker Agent loses 4 points for them
Watch for
Closed source under Cursor's terms, with no public repository, CI or issue tracker
Docker Agent BB
Best for Teams already on Docker who want agents defined in a file, shared through an OCI registry and run the same way in a terminal, in CI or behind an HTTP, MCP or A2A server.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 88 against 45
- Schema & documentation, 90 against 82
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 30
- Maintenance & community, 96 against 74
- Transparency & trust, 80 against 70
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- No key needed to call it
- Free to start without a card
- Open source
Watch for
Usage telemetry is on by default and command events can include prompts passed as arguments
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Cursor Agent SDK | Docker Agent | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 45 | 88 | Docker Agent +43 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 82 | 90 | Docker Agent +8 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 80 | 81 | Docker Agent +1 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 68 | 70 | Docker Agent +2 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 60 | Docker Agent +30 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 74 | 96 | Docker Agent +22 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 70 | 80 | Docker Agent +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -4 | |
| Total | B 63.6/100 | BB 76.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Cursor Agent SDK | Docker Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent framework | Agent framework |
| Vendor | Cursor | Docker |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Your plan | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary. The package's LICENSE.md reads "© Anysphere Inc. All rights reserved", with use subject to Cursor's Terms of Service (updated 3 September 2026). No source repository is published | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-25 | 2026-10-09 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-09-03 | 2026-08-26 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-29 | 2026-08-26 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | yes |
| Popularity | none | 4k stars |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Cursor Agent SDK
An agent-as-code framework with typed tools, declared read and write effects that drive retries and dry runs, an approval gate per tool and evals that assert on tool calls. It's closed source, every model turn runs through Cursor's backend on a Cursor plan, local sandboxing is off by default, and the changelog has two entries.
Docker Agent
An agent with an MCP server is eight lines of YAML, and the same file runs in a terminal, headless, or as an HTTP, MCP or A2A server. Usage telemetry is on by default and can carry prompts passed as command arguments, and two high-severity approval bypasses were fixed in August and September 2026.
Before you call either
Cursor Agent SDK
- Install
@grok/agent-sdk, not@cursor/agent-sdkfrom the launch post. That name answers 404 on npm - Set
local.sandboxbefore a turn reads webhook payloads, pull request diffs or chat. Without it shell commands auto-approve with the host's credentials - Give every tool an
effect. A tool without one counts as a write, runs once and is stubbed in dry runs - Start
agent-sdk servewith--bearer-tokenon any shared host.--allow-anonymousadmits every caller as one principal - Delete bot/hooks/memory.ts when sessions serve different people. The journal shares each turn's message and result with later turns
Docker Agent
- Set
TELEMETRY_ENABLED=falsebeforerunorexecwith a prompt on the command line. Telemetry is on by default and sends positional arguments - For unattended runs pass
--safety restrictedwith an allow-list, or--sandbox. Without a policy,--execrejects every tool call that needs approval - Set
max_iterationsand abudgetblock in the config. Both are unlimited by default - Run 1.130.0 or later. Earlier versions ran shell commands embedded in local skills, and A2A sessions before 1.126.0 skipped tool approval
- Review
runtime.safetyin any config pulled from a registry or URL. An author default ofautonomousruns every tool call unprompted
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Cursor Agent SDK or Docker Agent?
Docker Agent scores 76.5 (BB) on agent readiness against Cursor Agent SDK's 63.6 (B), and leads in every scored category.
Are Cursor Agent SDK and Docker Agent open source?
No open-source release is listed for Cursor Agent SDK. Docker Agent is open source (Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with Cursor Agent SDK or Docker Agent
- AgentOS vs Cursor Agent SDK
- AgentOS vs Docker Agent
- Agno vs Cursor Agent SDK
- Agno vs Docker Agent
- Claude Agent SDK vs Cursor Agent SDK
- Claude Agent SDK vs Docker Agent
- CrewAI vs Cursor Agent SDK
- CrewAI vs Docker Agent
- Cursor Agent SDK vs Agent Development Kit (ADK)
- Cursor Agent SDK vs guilds.run
- Cursor Agent SDK vs LangGraph
- Cursor Agent SDK vs Microsoft Agent Framework
- Cursor Agent SDK vs OpenAI Agents SDK
- Cursor Agent SDK vs Pydantic AI
- Cursor Agent SDK vs TradingAgents
- Docker Agent vs Agent Development Kit (ADK)
- Docker Agent vs guilds.run
- Docker Agent vs LangGraph
- Docker Agent vs Microsoft Agent Framework
- Docker Agent vs OpenAI Agents SDK
- Docker Agent vs Pydantic AI
- Docker Agent vs TradingAgents
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/cursor-agent-sdk-vs-docker-agent.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/cursor-agent-sdk.json·/api/v1/tools/docker-agent.json - From a terminal
anchor compare cursor-agent-sdk docker-agent(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "cursor-agent-sdk", "b": "docker-agent"}at/mcp, no key