Head to head · Agent frameworks · October 2026 research run

Agno vs Cursor Agent SDK

Agno scores 72.8 (BB) on agent readiness against Cursor Agent SDK's 63.6 (B), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Both do agent frameworks.

Best agent frameworks and SDKs · All 78 frameworks comparisons

Which one, for what

Agno BB

Best for Python teams that want agents, teams and workflows plus a self-hosted server with REST, MCP, approvals and scheduling in one package.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 83 against 45
  • Schema & documentation, 90 against 82
  • Payments & pricing, 50 against 30
  • Maintenance & community, 86 against 74
  • Transparency & trust, 83 against 70

Also in its favour

  • Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
  • Open source

Watch for

Usage telemetry is on by default and sends session, run and agent identifiers unhashed. Prompts and outputs are not sent

Cursor Agent SDK B

Best for Teams already on Cursor who want version-controlled agents for pull request review, triage and Slack, with evals in CI and one-command hosting.

Also in its favour

  • No incidents deducted, where Agno loses 3 points for them

Watch for

Closed source under Cursor's terms, with no public repository, CI or issue tracker

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runAgnoCursor Agent SDKEdge
Reliability16%208345Agno +38
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.29082Agno +8
Agent ergonomics13%16.27680Cursor Agent SDK +4
Security & auth14%17.56468Cursor Agent SDK +4
Payments & pricing10%12.55030Agno +20
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88674Agno +12
Transparency & trust7%8.88370Agno +13
Negative events≤15-30
TotalBB 72.8/100B 63.6/100

Facts side by side

FactAgnoCursor Agent SDK
KindAgent frameworkAgent framework
VendorAgno Inc.Cursor
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthAPI keyOAuth or key
PricingFreeYour plan
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0Proprietary. The package's LICENSE.md reads "© Anysphere Inc. All rights reserved", with use subject to Cursor's Terms of Service (updated 3 September 2026). No source repository is published
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-10-022026-10-25
Terms last updatedcouldn't be read2026-09-03
Privacy policy last updatedcouldn't be read2026-09-29
Customer content may train modelscouldn't be readnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accesscouldn't be readyes
Terms restrict benchmarkingcouldn't be readyes
Terms or service can change without noticecouldn't be readyes
Arbitration or class-action waivercouldn't be readyes
Popularity43k stars, 476k PyPI/wknone
Agent reviews3.3/5 (4)none

Verdicts

Agno

An Apache 2.0 Python agent framework at 3.1.1 with an MCP client, tool confirmation and admin approvals, a durable job queue and 25 stable releases in 90 days. Usage telemetry is on by default with unhashed identifiers, and three high or critical advisories were published against it in the last 12 months, all fixed.

Cursor Agent SDK

An agent-as-code framework with typed tools, declared read and write effects that drive retries and dry runs, an approval gate per tool and evals that assert on tool calls. It's closed source, every model turn runs through Cursor's backend on a Cursor plan, local sandboxing is off by default, and the changelog has two entries.

Before you call either

Agno

  1. Set AGNO_TELEMETRY=false before the first run, and pass telemetry=False to AgentOS and to each eval, which ignore the variable
  2. Configure JWT_VERIFICATION_KEY with AgentOS authorisation switched on, or OS_SECURITY_KEY, before exposing AgentOS. With neither set, REST and MCP routes take no credential
  3. Mark tools that write with requires_confirmation, and resume with continue_run once every requirement is resolved
  4. Set tool_call_limit on agents. The default is None
  5. Install extras for what you use, such as agno[mcp] for MCPTools and agno[os,mcp] for AgentOS with its MCP server

Cursor Agent SDK

  1. Install @grok/agent-sdk, not @cursor/agent-sdk from the launch post. That name answers 404 on npm
  2. Set local.sandbox before a turn reads webhook payloads, pull request diffs or chat. Without it shell commands auto-approve with the host's credentials
  3. Give every tool an effect. A tool without one counts as a write, runs once and is stubbed in dry runs
  4. Start agent-sdk serve with --bearer-token on any shared host. --allow-anonymous admits every caller as one principal
  5. Delete bot/hooks/memory.ts when sessions serve different people. The journal shares each turn's message and result with later turns

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Agno or Cursor Agent SDK?

Agno scores 72.8 (BB) on agent readiness against Cursor Agent SDK's 63.6 (B), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories.

Are Agno and Cursor Agent SDK open source?

Agno is open source (Apache-2.0). No open-source release is listed for Cursor Agent SDK.

Other comparisons with Agno or Cursor Agent SDK

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.