Head to head · Agent frameworks · October 2026 research run
Agno vs Cursor Agent SDK
Agno scores 72.8 (BB) on agent readiness against Cursor Agent SDK's 63.6 (B), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Both do agent frameworks.
Best agent frameworks and SDKs · All 78 frameworks comparisons
Which one, for what
Agno BB
Best for Python teams that want agents, teams and workflows plus a self-hosted server with REST, MCP, approvals and scheduling in one package.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 83 against 45
- Schema & documentation, 90 against 82
- Payments & pricing, 50 against 30
- Maintenance & community, 86 against 74
- Transparency & trust, 83 against 70
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Open source
Watch for
Usage telemetry is on by default and sends session, run and agent identifiers unhashed. Prompts and outputs are not sent
Best for Teams already on Cursor who want version-controlled agents for pull request review, triage and Slack, with evals in CI and one-command hosting.
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where Agno loses 3 points for them
Watch for
Closed source under Cursor's terms, with no public repository, CI or issue tracker
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Agno | Cursor Agent SDK | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 83 | 45 | Agno +38 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 90 | 82 | Agno +8 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 76 | 80 | Cursor Agent SDK +4 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 64 | 68 | Cursor Agent SDK +4 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 50 | 30 | Agno +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 86 | 74 | Agno +12 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 83 | 70 | Agno +13 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -3 | 0 | |
| Total | BB 72.8/100 | B 63.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Agno | Cursor Agent SDK |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent framework | Agent framework |
| Vendor | Agno Inc. | Cursor |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Free | Your plan |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Proprietary. The package's LICENSE.md reads "© Anysphere Inc. All rights reserved", with use subject to Cursor's Terms of Service (updated 3 September 2026). No source repository is published |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-02 | 2026-10-25 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | 2026-09-03 |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | 2026-09-29 |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | yes |
| Popularity | 43k stars, 476k PyPI/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | 3.3/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
Agno
An Apache 2.0 Python agent framework at 3.1.1 with an MCP client, tool confirmation and admin approvals, a durable job queue and 25 stable releases in 90 days. Usage telemetry is on by default with unhashed identifiers, and three high or critical advisories were published against it in the last 12 months, all fixed.
Cursor Agent SDK
An agent-as-code framework with typed tools, declared read and write effects that drive retries and dry runs, an approval gate per tool and evals that assert on tool calls. It's closed source, every model turn runs through Cursor's backend on a Cursor plan, local sandboxing is off by default, and the changelog has two entries.
Before you call either
Agno
- Set AGNO_TELEMETRY=false before the first run, and pass telemetry=False to AgentOS and to each eval, which ignore the variable
- Configure JWT_VERIFICATION_KEY with AgentOS authorisation switched on, or OS_SECURITY_KEY, before exposing AgentOS. With neither set, REST and MCP routes take no credential
- Mark tools that write with requires_confirmation, and resume with continue_run once every requirement is resolved
- Set tool_call_limit on agents. The default is None
- Install extras for what you use, such as agno[mcp] for MCPTools and agno[os,mcp] for AgentOS with its MCP server
Cursor Agent SDK
- Install
@grok/agent-sdk, not@cursor/agent-sdkfrom the launch post. That name answers 404 on npm - Set
local.sandboxbefore a turn reads webhook payloads, pull request diffs or chat. Without it shell commands auto-approve with the host's credentials - Give every tool an
effect. A tool without one counts as a write, runs once and is stubbed in dry runs - Start
agent-sdk servewith--bearer-tokenon any shared host.--allow-anonymousadmits every caller as one principal - Delete bot/hooks/memory.ts when sessions serve different people. The journal shares each turn's message and result with later turns
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Agno or Cursor Agent SDK?
Agno scores 72.8 (BB) on agent readiness against Cursor Agent SDK's 63.6 (B), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories.
Are Agno and Cursor Agent SDK open source?
Agno is open source (Apache-2.0). No open-source release is listed for Cursor Agent SDK.
Other comparisons with Agno or Cursor Agent SDK
- AgentOS vs Agno
- AgentOS vs Cursor Agent SDK
- Agno vs Claude Agent SDK
- Agno vs CrewAI
- Agno vs Docker Agent
- Agno vs Agent Development Kit (ADK)
- Agno vs guilds.run
- Agno vs LangGraph
- Agno vs Microsoft Agent Framework
- Agno vs OpenAI Agents SDK
- Agno vs Pydantic AI
- Agno vs TradingAgents
- Claude Agent SDK vs Cursor Agent SDK
- CrewAI vs Cursor Agent SDK
- Cursor Agent SDK vs Docker Agent
- Cursor Agent SDK vs Agent Development Kit (ADK)
- Cursor Agent SDK vs guilds.run
- Cursor Agent SDK vs LangGraph
- Cursor Agent SDK vs Microsoft Agent Framework
- Cursor Agent SDK vs OpenAI Agents SDK
- Cursor Agent SDK vs Pydantic AI
- Cursor Agent SDK vs TradingAgents
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/agno-vs-cursor-agent-sdk.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/agno.json·/api/v1/tools/cursor-agent-sdk.json - From a terminal
anchor compare agno cursor-agent-sdk(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "agno", "b": "cursor-agent-sdk"}at/mcp, no key