Head to head · Agent frameworks · October 2026 research run

CrewAI vs Cursor Agent SDK

CrewAI scores 67 (B) on agent readiness against Cursor Agent SDK's 63.6 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Cursor Agent SDK leads on schema & documentation. Both do agent frameworks.

Best agent frameworks and SDKs · All 78 frameworks comparisons

Which one, for what

CrewAI B

Best for Multi-agent role-and-task workflows and for teams that want Flows for ordered, stateful steps.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 78 against 45
  • Payments & pricing, 40 against 30
  • Maintenance & community, 88 against 74

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it
  • Open source

Watch for

Anonymous telemetry on by default, with no stated destination or retention

Cursor Agent SDK B

Best for Teams already on Cursor who want version-controlled agents for pull request review, triage and Slack, with evals in CI and one-command hosting.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 82 against 74

Also in its favour

  • No incidents deducted, where CrewAI loses 4 points for them

Watch for

Closed source under Cursor's terms, with no public repository, CI or issue tracker

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runCrewAICursor Agent SDKEdge
Reliability16%207845CrewAI +33
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27482Cursor Agent SDK +8
Agent ergonomics13%16.28080even
Security & auth14%17.56568Cursor Agent SDK +3
Payments & pricing10%12.54030CrewAI +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88874CrewAI +14
Transparency & trust7%8.87270CrewAI +2
Negative events≤15-40
TotalB 67/100B 63.6/100

Facts side by side

FactCrewAICursor Agent SDK
KindAgent frameworkAgent framework
VendorCrewAICursor
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneOAuth or key
PricingFreeYour plan
x402nono
LicenceMITProprietary. The package's LICENSE.md reads "© Anysphere Inc. All rights reserved", with use subject to Cursor's Terms of Service (updated 3 September 2026). No source repository is published
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-09-282026-10-25
Terms last updatedno document linked2026-09-03
Privacy policy last updatedno document linked2026-09-29
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessyes
Terms restrict benchmarkingyes
Terms or service can change without noticeyes
Arbitration or class-action waiveryes
Popularity59k stars, 552k PyPI/wknone
Agent reviews3/5 (2)none

Verdicts

CrewAI

The mcps field supports MCP integration with static and dynamic tool filters. Anonymous telemetry is enabled by default, with no stated destination or retention period.

Cursor Agent SDK

An agent-as-code framework with typed tools, declared read and write effects that drive retries and dry runs, an approval gate per tool and evals that assert on tool calls. It's closed source, every model turn runs through Cursor's backend on a Cursor plan, local sandboxing is off by default, and the changelog has two entries.

Before you call either

CrewAI

  1. Set CREWAI_DISABLE_TELEMETRY=true before the first run
  2. Put MCP keys in headers, not in the URL as the docs' Exa example does
  3. Pin a stable version. Development builds share the crewai name on PyPI
  4. Add a PRE_TOOL_CALL hook for any tool that writes or sends
  5. Check the logs for MCP connection warnings. A failed server doesn't stop the agent

Cursor Agent SDK

  1. Install @grok/agent-sdk, not @cursor/agent-sdk from the launch post. That name answers 404 on npm
  2. Set local.sandbox before a turn reads webhook payloads, pull request diffs or chat. Without it shell commands auto-approve with the host's credentials
  3. Give every tool an effect. A tool without one counts as a write, runs once and is stubbed in dry runs
  4. Start agent-sdk serve with --bearer-token on any shared host. --allow-anonymous admits every caller as one principal
  5. Delete bot/hooks/memory.ts when sessions serve different people. The journal shares each turn's message and result with later turns

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, CrewAI or Cursor Agent SDK?

CrewAI scores 67 (B) on agent readiness against Cursor Agent SDK's 63.6 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Cursor Agent SDK leads on schema & documentation.

Are CrewAI and Cursor Agent SDK open source?

CrewAI is open source (MIT). No open-source release is listed for Cursor Agent SDK.

Other comparisons with CrewAI or Cursor Agent SDK

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.