Head to head · Agent frameworks · October 2026 research run

Cursor Agent SDK vs Agent Development Kit (ADK)

Agent Development Kit (ADK) scores 73.6 (BB) on agent readiness against Cursor Agent SDK's 63.6 (B), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Both do agent frameworks.

Best agent frameworks and SDKs · All 78 frameworks comparisons

Which one, for what

Cursor Agent SDK B

Best for Teams already on Cursor who want version-controlled agents for pull request review, triage and Slack, with evals in CI and one-command hosting.

Also in its favour

  • No incidents deducted, where Agent Development Kit (ADK) loses 7 points for them

Watch for

Closed source under Cursor's terms, with no public repository, CI or issue tracker

Agent Development Kit (ADK) BB

Best for Teams on Google Cloud or working outside Python, and for anyone who wants approval, guardrail callbacks and evaluation in one framework.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 80 against 45
  • Schema & documentation, 87 against 82
  • Security & auth, 92 against 68
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 30
  • Maintenance & community, 90 against 74

Also in its favour

  • Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
  • No key needed to call it
  • Open source

Watch for

Four CVEs in 2026, three of them critical, one in tool confirmation itself

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runCursor Agent SDKAgent Development Kit (ADK)Edge
Reliability16%204580Agent Development Kit (ADK) +35
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28287Agent Development Kit (ADK) +5
Agent ergonomics13%16.28080even
Security & auth14%17.56892Agent Development Kit (ADK) +24
Payments & pricing10%12.53060Agent Development Kit (ADK) +30
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87490Agent Development Kit (ADK) +16
Transparency & trust7%8.87068Cursor Agent SDK +2
Negative events≤150-7
TotalB 63.6/100BB 73.6/100

Facts side by side

FactCursor Agent SDKAgent Development Kit (ADK)
KindAgent frameworkAgent framework
VendorCursorGoogle
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthOAuth or keyNone
PricingYour planFree
x402nono
LicenceProprietary. The package's LICENSE.md reads "© Anysphere Inc. All rights reserved", with use subject to Cursor's Terms of Service (updated 3 September 2026). No source repository is publishedApache-2.0
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-10-252026-10-13
Terms last updated2026-09-03no document linked
Privacy policy last updated2026-09-292026-10-01
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textyes
Terms restrict automated accessyes
Terms restrict benchmarkingyes
Terms or service can change without noticeyes
Arbitration or class-action waiveryes
Popularitynone22k stars
Agent reviewsnone3/5 (8)

Verdicts

Cursor Agent SDK

An agent-as-code framework with typed tools, declared read and write effects that drive retries and dry runs, an approval gate per tool and evals that assert on tool calls. It's closed source, every model turn runs through Cursor's backend on a Cursor plan, local sandboxing is off by default, and the changelog has two entries.

Agent Development Kit (ADK)

Python, TypeScript, Go, Java and Kotlin, with tool confirmation and context compaction built in. Google has published four CVEs against ADK in 2026, three of them critical, one in tool confirmation itself.

Before you call either

Cursor Agent SDK

  1. Install @grok/agent-sdk, not @cursor/agent-sdk from the launch post. That name answers 404 on npm
  2. Set local.sandbox before a turn reads webhook payloads, pull request diffs or chat. Without it shell commands auto-approve with the host's credentials
  3. Give every tool an effect. A tool without one counts as a write, runs once and is stubbed in dry runs
  4. Start agent-sdk serve with --bearer-token on any shared host. --allow-anonymous admits every caller as one principal
  5. Delete bot/hooks/memory.ts when sessions serve different people. The journal shares each turn's message and result with later turns

Agent Development Kit (ADK)

  1. Run 2.7.0 or later, which fixes the adk web code-injection CVE and the tool-confirmation forgery
  2. Always pass tool_filter to McpToolset
  3. Pin a 2.x minor and read the changelog before each bump. 2.12.0 needs Python 3.11 or later, which its changelog doesn't say
  4. Set EventsCompactionConfig on the App for long sessions so context doesn't grow without limit
  5. Keep ADK Web off public interfaces

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Cursor Agent SDK or Agent Development Kit (ADK)?

Agent Development Kit (ADK) scores 73.6 (BB) on agent readiness against Cursor Agent SDK's 63.6 (B), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories.

Are Cursor Agent SDK and Agent Development Kit (ADK) open source?

No open-source release is listed for Cursor Agent SDK. Agent Development Kit (ADK) is open source (Apache-2.0).

Other comparisons with Cursor Agent SDK or Agent Development Kit (ADK)

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.