Head to head · Agent frameworks · October 2026 research run
Docker Agent vs guilds.run
Docker Agent scores 76.5 (BB) on agent readiness against guilds.run's 56.5 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do agent frameworks.
Best agent frameworks and SDKs · All 55 frameworks comparisons
Which one, for what
Docker Agent BB
Best for Teams already on Docker who want agents defined in a file, shared through an OCI registry and run the same way in a terminal, in CI or behind an HTTP, MCP or A2A server.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 88 against 53
- Schema & documentation, 90 against 58
- Agent ergonomics, 81 against 67
- Maintenance & community, 96 against 41
- Transparency & trust, 80 against 52
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- No key needed to call it
Watch for
Usage telemetry is on by default and command events can include prompts passed as arguments
Best for A person or small team that wants a standing, inspectable team of agents with schedules, shared tables and a web app, run on one machine, and is comfortable tracking main.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No tagged release, version number, changelog or published image. Users install whatever is on main
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Docker Agent | guilds.run | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 88 | 53 | Docker Agent +35 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 90 | 58 | Docker Agent +32 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 81 | 67 | Docker Agent +14 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 70 | 68 | Docker Agent +2 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 96 | 41 | Docker Agent +55 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 80 | 52 | Docker Agent +28 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -4 | -2 | |
| Total | BB 76.5/100 | C 56.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Docker Agent | guilds.run |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent framework | Agent framework |
| Vendor | Docker | Cigale AI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | API key |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0-only |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-07 | none |
| Terms last updated | 2026-08-26 | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-08-26 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Popularity | 4k stars | 57 stars |
Verdicts
Docker Agent
An agent with an MCP server is eight lines of YAML, and the same file runs in a terminal, headless, or as an HTTP, MCP or A2A server. Usage telemetry is on by default and can carry prompts passed as command arguments, and two high-severity approval bypasses were fixed in August and September 2026.
guilds.run
A self-hosted multi-agent system that records each run's prompt, tool calls and memory changes, with per-agent models and tools and no telemetry by default. Public since 9 October 2026, it has no tagged release or published package, its own security register lists 13 open issues, and the site's terms and privacy links return 404.
Before you call either
Docker Agent
- Set
TELEMETRY_ENABLED=falsebeforerunorexecwith a prompt on the command line. Telemetry is on by default and sends positional arguments - For unattended runs pass
--safety restrictedwith an allow-list, or--sandbox. Without a policy,--execrejects every tool call that needs approval - Set
max_iterationsand abudgetblock in the config. Both are unlimited by default - Run 1.130.0 or later. Earlier versions ran shell commands embedded in local skills, and A2A sessions before 1.126.0 skipped tool approval
- Review
runtime.safetyin any config pulled from a registry or URL. An author default ofautonomousruns every tool call unprompted
guilds.run
- Keep the box on loopback or behind an authenticating proxy with AUTH_MODE=trusted-header. The default mode does not authenticate
- Put agents that hold different secrets or GitHub tokens on different machines. Agents on one machine can read each other's homes and tokens
- Back up the .env file written by ./setup.sh. It holds the only copy of the key that encrypts stored credentials
- Set a spend limit at your model provider. guilds.run sets no spend cap, and max_tool_calls defaults to 50 per run
- Pin a commit of main when you deploy. There are no tagged releases or versioned images yet
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Docker Agent or guilds.run?
Docker Agent scores 76.5 (BB) on agent readiness against guilds.run's 56.5 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Are Docker Agent and guilds.run open source?
Yes. Docker Agent is open source (Apache-2.0). guilds.run is open source (AGPL-3.0-only).
Other comparisons with Docker Agent or guilds.run
- AgentOS vs Docker Agent
- AgentOS vs guilds.run
- Agno vs Docker Agent
- Agno vs guilds.run
- Claude Agent SDK vs Docker Agent
- Claude Agent SDK vs guilds.run
- CrewAI vs Docker Agent
- CrewAI vs guilds.run
- Docker Agent vs Agent Development Kit (ADK)
- Docker Agent vs LangGraph
- Docker Agent vs Microsoft Agent Framework
- Docker Agent vs OpenAI Agents SDK
- Docker Agent vs Pydantic AI
- Agent Development Kit (ADK) vs guilds.run
- guilds.run vs LangGraph
- guilds.run vs Microsoft Agent Framework
- guilds.run vs OpenAI Agents SDK
- guilds.run vs Pydantic AI
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/docker-agent-vs-guilds-run.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/docker-agent.json·/api/v1/tools/guilds-run.json - From a terminal
anchor compare docker-agent guilds-run(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "docker-agent", "b": "guilds-run"}at/mcp, no key