Head to head · Agent frameworks · October 2026 research run
guilds.run vs Pydantic AI
Pydantic AI scores 83.7 (A) on agent readiness against guilds.run's 56.5 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do agent frameworks.
Best agent frameworks and SDKs · All 55 frameworks comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for A person or small team that wants a standing, inspectable team of agents with schedules, shared tables and a web app, run on one machine, and is comfortable tracking main.
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
No tagged release, version number, changelog or published image. Users install whatever is on main
Best for Python teams that want typed, validated outputs and tools, many model providers and durable runs on an engine they already use.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 83 against 53
- Schema & documentation, 100 against 58
- Agent ergonomics, 95 against 67
- Security & auth, 95 against 68
- Maintenance & community, 90 against 41
- Transparency & trust, 85 against 52
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- No key needed to call it
Watch for
Python only
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | guilds.run | Pydantic AI | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 53 | 83 | Pydantic AI +30 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 58 | 100 | Pydantic AI +42 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 67 | 95 | Pydantic AI +28 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 68 | 95 | Pydantic AI +27 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 41 | 90 | Pydantic AI +49 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 52 | 85 | Pydantic AI +33 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -2 | -4 | |
| Total | C 56.5/100 | A 83.7/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | guilds.run | Pydantic AI |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent framework | Agent framework |
| Vendor | Cigale AI | Pydantic |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | API key | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0-only | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | none | 2026-10-03 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2024-02-21 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Popularity | 57 stars | 20k stars, 1.3M PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 4/5 (8) |
Verdicts
guilds.run
A self-hosted multi-agent system that records each run's prompt, tool calls and memory changes, with per-agent models and tools and no telemetry by default. Public since 9 October 2026, it has no tagged release or published package, its own security register lists 13 open issues, and the site's terms and privacy links return 404.
Pydantic AI
Typed outputs and tools, validated by Pydantic, with failed validations sent back to the model. Python only.
Before you call either
guilds.run
- Keep the box on loopback or behind an authenticating proxy with AUTH_MODE=trusted-header. The default mode does not authenticate
- Put agents that hold different secrets or GitHub tokens on different machines. Agents on one machine can read each other's homes and tokens
- Back up the .env file written by ./setup.sh. It holds the only copy of the key that encrypts stored credentials
- Set a spend limit at your model provider. guilds.run sets no spend cap, and max_tool_calls defaults to 50 per run
- Pin a commit of main when you deploy. There are no tagged releases or versioned images yet
Pydantic AI
- Define the output type first. Validation retries fix most malformed answers without a prompt change, and the test model checks the wiring with no key
- Use streamable HTTP for MCP, since SSE is deprecated. Call
.defer_loading()on large MCP servers so their tools stay out of context until searched - Set usage limits on every run that calls paid models
- Give model-run commands
LocalWorkspace(read_only=True)or a Harness sandbox. A plainLocalWorkspaceruns them on your machine as you - Stay on a current release. 2026 advisories hit URL downloads, the cloud-metadata blocklist and the local web chat UI (
Agent.to_web(),clai web)
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, guilds.run or Pydantic AI?
Pydantic AI scores 83.7 (A) on agent readiness against guilds.run's 56.5 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Are guilds.run and Pydantic AI open source?
Yes. guilds.run is open source (AGPL-3.0-only). Pydantic AI is open source (MIT).
Other comparisons with guilds.run or Pydantic AI
- AgentOS vs guilds.run
- AgentOS vs Pydantic AI
- Agno vs guilds.run
- Agno vs Pydantic AI
- Claude Agent SDK vs guilds.run
- Claude Agent SDK vs Pydantic AI
- CrewAI vs guilds.run
- CrewAI vs Pydantic AI
- Docker Agent vs guilds.run
- Docker Agent vs Pydantic AI
- Agent Development Kit (ADK) vs guilds.run
- Agent Development Kit (ADK) vs Pydantic AI
- guilds.run vs LangGraph
- guilds.run vs Microsoft Agent Framework
- guilds.run vs OpenAI Agents SDK
- LangGraph vs Pydantic AI
- Microsoft Agent Framework vs Pydantic AI
- OpenAI Agents SDK vs Pydantic AI
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/guilds-run-vs-pydantic-ai.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/guilds-run.json·/api/v1/tools/pydantic-ai.json - From a terminal
anchor compare guilds-run pydantic-ai(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "guilds-run", "b": "pydantic-ai"}at/mcp, no key