Head to head · Lead search · October 2026 research run
Clay vs Explorium AgentSource
Clay scores 57.7 (C) on agent readiness against Explorium AgentSource's 48.1 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Explorium AgentSource leads on payments & pricing. Both do lead search.
Best lead, contact and company data APIs for AI agents · All 171 leads comparisons
Which one, for what
Clay C
Best for Agents building prospect lists and enriching contacts or accounts through many providers at once.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 84 against 76
- Security & auth, 48 against 37
- Maintenance & community, 75 against 28
- Transparency & trust, 64 against 59
Watch for
API keys carry no scopes and act with the user's workspace access
Best for Agents that build prospect lists by filter and then enrich them, or that watch companies for events such as funding and role changes.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 30
Watch for
No status page was found, and no SLA is published
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Clay | Explorium AgentSource | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 45 | 42 | Clay +3 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 84 | 76 | Clay +8 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 66 | 63 | Clay +3 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 48 | 37 | Clay +11 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 40 | Explorium AgentSource +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 75 | 28 | Clay +47 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 64 | 59 | Clay +5 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -2 | |
| Total | C 57.7/100 | D 48.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Clay | Explorium AgentSource |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Clay Labs Inc. | Explorium Ltd. |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.clay.com/public/v0 | https://api.explorium.ai |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under the Clay Terms of Service. The agent plugin repository carries no licence file | Proprietary service under the Explorium Terms of Use. The mcp-explorium repository of connection files is MIT |
| Tools exposed | none | 11 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-06 | 2026-09-02 |
| Terms last updated | 2024-05-23 | 2026-06-14 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2020-09-11 | 2026-06-28 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |
Verdicts
Clay
A documented Public API with an OpenAPI spec, llms.txt and plan-capped search, plus a JSON-first CLI released several times a fortnight, give agents Clay's people search and multi-provider enrichment. Keys have no scopes, the Claude Code plugin auto-approves most CLI calls, and the privacy policy dates from 2020.
Explorium AgentSource
AgentSource v2 has a public OpenAPI 3.1 file, Markdown docs, a 200 queries a minute limit with Retry-After, public credit prices and a 100-credit trial. No status page or published SLA was found, each company shares one API key with no scopes, and the vendor's two published price tables disagree.
Before you call either
Clay
- Fetch GET /search/query-mode/reference before writing a search query
- Poll routine results until a terminal 200, since 202 means still running
- Expect HTTP 402 when a plan's search cap is hit, and tell the user the reset date
- Check GET /credits/balance before large batch runs
- Ask the user before enabling the plugin's auto-approve hook in a shared workspace
Explorium AgentSource
- Send the key in the
api_keyheader tohttps://api.explorium.aiand use/v2paths. v1 is deprecated - Point MCP clients at
https://mcp-v2.explorium.ai/mcp. The site's agent files still name the v1 server atmcp.explorium.ai - Count each entity in a batch as one query against the 200 a minute limit, so 50 IDs in one call spend 50
- Call the statistics endpoint first to size an audience for free. Fetch costs 1 credit a result, or 2 with the Bombora intent filter
- Call
/v2/autocompletebefore filtering on category, tech stack or job title, and never mix two category types in one request
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Clay or Explorium AgentSource?
Clay scores 57.7 (C) on agent readiness against Explorium AgentSource's 48.1 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Explorium AgentSource leads on payments & pricing.
Do Clay and Explorium AgentSource need an API key?
Clay takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Explorium AgentSource needs an API key.
Can an agent call Clay and Explorium AgentSource without installing anything?
Yes. Clay has a hosted endpoint at https://api.clay.com/public/v0 and Explorium AgentSource at https://api.explorium.ai.
Other comparisons with Clay or Explorium AgentSource
- Apollo API + MCP vs Clay
- Apollo API + MCP vs Explorium AgentSource
- Clay vs Coresignal API + MCP
- Clay vs Crustdata API + MCP
- Clay vs Enrich Layer API + MCP
- Clay vs FullEnrich API + MCP
- Clay vs Fuse MCP
- Clay vs Gojiberry
- Clay vs Hunter API + MCP
- Clay vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- Clay vs Lusha API + MCP
- Clay vs People Data Labs
- Clay vs Prospeo API + MCP
- Clay vs RocketReach API
- Clay vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Coresignal API + MCP vs Explorium AgentSource
- Crustdata API + MCP vs Explorium AgentSource
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Explorium AgentSource
- Explorium AgentSource vs FullEnrich API + MCP
- Explorium AgentSource vs Fuse MCP
- Explorium AgentSource vs Gojiberry
- Explorium AgentSource vs Hunter API + MCP
- Explorium AgentSource vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- Explorium AgentSource vs Lusha API + MCP
- Explorium AgentSource vs People Data Labs
- Explorium AgentSource vs Prospeo API + MCP
- Explorium AgentSource vs RocketReach API
- Explorium AgentSource vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Clay vs Clearbit
- Clay vs Dropcontact API + MCP
- Clay vs FullContact
- Clearbit vs Explorium AgentSource
- Dropcontact API + MCP vs Explorium AgentSource
- Explorium AgentSource vs FullContact
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/clay-vs-explorium-agentsource.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/clay.json·/api/v1/tools/explorium-agentsource.json - From a terminal
anchor compare clay explorium-agentsource(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "clay", "b": "explorium-agentsource"}at/mcp, no key