Head to head · Lead search · October 2026 research run
Explorium AgentSource vs Fuse MCP
Explorium AgentSource and Fuse MCP score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 48.1 (D) and 47.9 (D). Fuse MCP leads on security & auth and maintenance & community. Both do lead search.
Best lead, contact and company data APIs for AI agents · All 120 leads comparisons
Which one, for what
Good for Agents that build prospect lists by filter and then enrich them, or that watch companies for events such as funding and role changes.
Ahead on
- Agent ergonomics, 63 against 57
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 30
- Transparency & trust, 59 against 49
Watch for
No status page was found, and no SLA is published
Fuse MCP D
Good for Suited to a salesperson or founder who wants an assistant to build prospect lists, enrich them and run email and LinkedIn outreach inside one Fuse account.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 45 against 37
- Maintenance & community, 35 against 28
Watch for
The only OAuth scope is mcp:tools, so a connection can do everything its user can, including sending email and LinkedIn messages
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Explorium AgentSource | Fuse MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 42 | 40 | Explorium AgentSource +2 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 76 | 72 | Explorium AgentSource +4 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 63 | 57 | Explorium AgentSource +6 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 37 | 45 | Fuse MCP +8 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 30 | Explorium AgentSource +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 28 | 35 | Fuse MCP +7 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 59 | 49 | Explorium AgentSource +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -2 | 0 | |
| Total | 48.1 · D | 47.9 · D |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Explorium AgentSource | Fuse MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | MCP server |
| Vendor | Explorium Ltd. | FuseAI, LLC |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.explorium.ai | https://mcp.fuseai.com |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) | Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under the Explorium Terms of Use. The mcp-explorium repository of connection files is MIT | Proprietary hosted service under FuseAI's terms of service. No public source repository found |
| Tools exposed | 11 | 290 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-02 | 2026-10-07 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-06-14 | 2026-07-01 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-06-28 | 2026-07-01 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | yes |
Verdicts
Explorium AgentSource
AgentSource v2 has a public OpenAPI 3.1 file, Markdown docs, a 200 queries a minute limit with Retry-After, public credit prices and a 100-credit trial. No status page or published SLA was found, each company shares one API key with no scopes, and the vendor's two published price tables disagree.
Fuse MCP
The server documents 290 tools with read-only and destructive annotations, OAuth with PKCE and dynamic client registration, and published limits of 60 requests a minute. The single mcp:tools scope grants everything the user can do, sends happen at once with no undo, and no status page, changelog or security contact was found.
Before you call either
Explorium AgentSource
- Send the key in the
api_keyheader tohttps://api.explorium.aiand use/v2paths. v1 is deprecated - Point MCP clients at
https://mcp-v2.explorium.ai/mcp. The site's agent files still name the v1 server atmcp.explorium.ai - Count each entity in a batch as one query against the 200 a minute limit, so 50 IDs in one call spend 50
- Call the statistics endpoint first to size an audience for free. Fetch costs 1 credit a result, or 2 with the Bombora intent filter
- Call
/v2/autocompletebefore filtering on category, tech stack or job title, and never mix two category types in one request
Fuse MCP
- Keep the client's approval prompt on for every tool that is not read-only. Sends, CRM pushes and Slack posts run at once with no undo
- Launch a campaign only on an explicit request. Creating one makes a draft, and
update_campaign_status_toolstarts real outreach - Call
get_credits_balanceandget_credit_pricesfirst. Every call needs at least 100 credits, and searches cost 2 credits a result - Resolve filter values with
lookup_filter_valuesorget_company_search_enumsbeforesearch_peopleorsearch_companies - Start long work with
deep_research_start, then polldeep_research_status. A tool call has 60 seconds, and runs take 5 to 20 minutes
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Explorium AgentSource or Fuse MCP?
Explorium AgentSource and Fuse MCP score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 48.1 (D) and 47.9 (D). Fuse MCP leads on security & auth and maintenance & community.
Do Explorium AgentSource and Fuse MCP need an API key?
Explorium AgentSource needs an API key. Fuse MCP uses an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Explorium AgentSource and Fuse MCP without installing anything?
Yes. Explorium AgentSource has a hosted endpoint at https://api.explorium.ai and Fuse MCP at https://mcp.fuseai.com.
Other comparisons with Explorium AgentSource or Fuse MCP
- Apollo API + MCP vs Explorium AgentSource
- Apollo API + MCP vs Fuse MCP
- Coresignal API + MCP vs Explorium AgentSource
- Coresignal API + MCP vs Fuse MCP
- Crustdata API + MCP vs Explorium AgentSource
- Crustdata API + MCP vs Fuse MCP
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Explorium AgentSource
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Fuse MCP
- Explorium AgentSource vs FullEnrich API + MCP
- Explorium AgentSource vs Gojiberry
- Explorium AgentSource vs Hunter API + MCP
- Explorium AgentSource vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- Explorium AgentSource vs Lusha API + MCP
- Explorium AgentSource vs People Data Labs
- Explorium AgentSource vs Prospeo API + MCP
- Explorium AgentSource vs RocketReach API
- Explorium AgentSource vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- FullEnrich API + MCP vs Fuse MCP
- Fuse MCP vs Gojiberry
- Fuse MCP vs Hunter API + MCP
- Fuse MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- Fuse MCP vs Lusha API + MCP
- Fuse MCP vs People Data Labs
- Fuse MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP
- Fuse MCP vs RocketReach API
- Fuse MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Dropcontact API + MCP vs Explorium AgentSource
- Dropcontact API + MCP vs Fuse MCP
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/explorium-agentsource-vs-fuse-mcp.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/explorium-agentsource.json·/api/v1/tools/fuse-mcp.json - From a terminal
anchor compare explorium-agentsource fuse-mcp(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "explorium-agentsource", "b": "fuse-mcp"}at/mcp, no key