Head to head · Lead search · October 2026 research run
Clay vs RocketReach API
Clay scores 57.7 (C) on agent readiness against RocketReach API's 51.2 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. RocketReach API leads on reliability and agent ergonomics. Both do lead search.
Best lead, contact and company data APIs for AI agents · All 171 leads comparisons
Which one, for what
Clay C
Best for Agents building prospect lists and enriching contacts or accounts through many providers at once.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 84 against 72
- Security & auth, 48 against 34
- Payments & pricing, 30 against 10
- Maintenance & community, 75 against 31
- Transparency & trust, 64 against 58
Watch for
API keys carry no scopes and act with the user's workspace access
Best for Teams that already hold a RocketReach plan and want an agent to search people and companies, reveal emails and phones, and verify single addresses over MCP.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 64 against 45
- Agent ergonomics, 72 against 66
Watch for
The pricing page is drawn by script and was not read, and the docs tell users without a paid plan to email for an API plan
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Clay | RocketReach API | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 45 | 64 | RocketReach API +19 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 84 | 72 | Clay +12 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 66 | 72 | RocketReach API +6 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 48 | 34 | Clay +14 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 10 | Clay +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 75 | 31 | Clay +44 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 64 | 58 | Clay +6 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 57.7/100 | D 51.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Clay | RocketReach API |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Clay Labs Inc. | RocketReach, LLC |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.clay.com/public/v0 | https://api.rocketreach.co/api/v2 |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under the Clay Terms of Service. The agent plugin repository carries no licence file | Proprietary service under RocketReach's Terms of Service. The Python SDK on GitHub is MIT |
| Tools exposed | none | 9 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-06 | none |
| Terms last updated | 2024-05-23 | 2024-01-31 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2020-09-11 | 2026-09-30 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | yes |
Verdicts
Clay
A documented Public API with an OpenAPI spec, llms.txt and plan-capped search, plus a JSON-first CLI released several times a fortnight, give agents Clay's people search and multi-provider enrichment. Keys have no scopes, the Claude Code plugin auto-approves most CLI calls, and the privacy policy dates from 2020.
RocketReach API
The hosted MCP server has nine documented tools, OAuth 2.1 with dynamic client registration and machine-readable error codes, and searches cost no credits. Plan prices were not readable, the docs send API plan requests to email, the terms require a human account holder, and the account tool returns the account's API key to the model.
Before you call either
Clay
- Fetch GET /search/query-mode/reference before writing a search query
- Poll routine results until a terminal 200, since 202 means still running
- Expect HTTP 402 when a plan's search cap is hit, and tell the user the reset date
- Check GET /credits/balance before large batch runs
- Ask the user before enabling the plugin's auto-approve hook in a shared workspace
RocketReach API
- Search first with
person_searchorcompany_search, which cost no credits, then look up only the profile IDs needed - Treat
status: "pending"as normal. Pollcheck_person_statusafter at least 3 seconds, and polling is free - Do not echo the
accounttool's output to users or logs. It includes the account's API key - Send the key in the
Api-Keyheader. Theapi_keyquery parameter is deprecated - Bulk lookup takes 1 to 100 queries and needs a webhook. Results arrive at the webhook, signed in
X-RocketReach-Signature - Do not loop on
unknownfromemail_verify, or onlookup_failedandnot_found. The last two are terminal
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Clay or RocketReach API?
Clay scores 57.7 (C) on agent readiness against RocketReach API's 51.2 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. RocketReach API leads on reliability and agent ergonomics.
Do Clay and RocketReach API need an API key?
Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Clay and RocketReach API without installing anything?
Yes. Clay has a hosted endpoint at https://api.clay.com/public/v0 and RocketReach API at https://api.rocketreach.co/api/v2.
Other comparisons with Clay or RocketReach API
- Apollo API + MCP vs Clay
- Apollo API + MCP vs RocketReach API
- Clay vs Coresignal API + MCP
- Clay vs Crustdata API + MCP
- Clay vs Enrich Layer API + MCP
- Clay vs Explorium AgentSource
- Clay vs FullEnrich API + MCP
- Clay vs Fuse MCP
- Clay vs Gojiberry
- Clay vs Hunter API + MCP
- Clay vs LeadMagic API + MCP
- Clay vs Lusha API + MCP
- Clay vs People Data Labs
- Clay vs Prospeo API + MCP
- Clay vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Coresignal API + MCP vs RocketReach API
- Crustdata API + MCP vs RocketReach API
- Enrich Layer API + MCP vs RocketReach API
- Explorium AgentSource vs RocketReach API
- FullEnrich API + MCP vs RocketReach API
- Fuse MCP vs RocketReach API
- Gojiberry vs RocketReach API
- LeadMagic API + MCP vs RocketReach API
- Lusha API + MCP vs RocketReach API
- People Data Labs vs RocketReach API
- Prospeo API + MCP vs RocketReach API
- RocketReach API vs ZoomInfo API + MCP
- Clay vs Clearbit
- Clay vs Dropcontact API + MCP
- Clay vs FullContact
- Clearbit vs RocketReach API
- Dropcontact API + MCP vs RocketReach API
- FullContact vs RocketReach API
- Hunter API + MCP vs RocketReach API
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/clay-vs-rocketreach.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/clay.json·/api/v1/tools/rocketreach.json - From a terminal
anchor compare clay rocketreach(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "clay", "b": "rocketreach"}at/mcp, no key