Head to head · Speech-to-text · October 2026 research run
Cartesia Ink vs Soniox Speech-to-Text
Cartesia Ink scores 67.9 (B) on agent readiness against Soniox Speech-to-Text's 58.2 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Soniox Speech-to-Text leads on security & auth and transparency & trust. Both do speech-to-text.
Best speech-to-text APIs for AI agents · All 91 stt comparisons
Which one, for what
Good for Suited to voice agents that need turn detection and transcription from one model in English, French, Hindi, Japanese or Spanish, and to teams already using Cartesia text-to-speech.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 73 against 65
- Schema & documentation, 89 against 60
- Payments & pricing, 35 against 20
- Maintenance & community, 85 against 30
Watch for
The terms let Cartesia train models on inputs and outputs unless otherwise agreed. Opting out is a form in the Playground's data controls
Good for Price-led multilingual transcription and translation, live or async, and for operators who want no training and no retention.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 70 against 52
- Transparency & trust, 76 against 67
Watch for
No free credits for new accounts since October 2025
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Cartesia Ink | Soniox Speech-to-Text | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 73 | 65 | Cartesia Ink +8 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 89 | 60 | Cartesia Ink +29 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 74 | 70 | Cartesia Ink +4 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 52 | 70 | Soniox Speech-to-Text +18 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 20 | Cartesia Ink +15 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 85 | 30 | Cartesia Ink +55 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 67 | 76 | Soniox Speech-to-Text +9 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 67.9 · B | 58.2 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Cartesia Ink | Soniox Speech-to-Text |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model API | Model API |
| Vendor | Cartesia | Soniox |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.cartesia.ai | https://api.soniox.com/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP, websocket, Streamable HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| Price for speech-to-text | not published | $0.0017 per minute of audio |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary hosted service under the Cartesia Terms of Service. The Python and JavaScript SDKs are Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 (Python SDK) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-08-11 |
| Terms last updated | 2024-06-14 | 2026-06-29 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2024-06-14 | 2026-06-29 |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 134 stars | 12 stars, 22k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Cartesia Ink
Ink 2 streams transcripts with turn detection built into the model, documented by an AsyncAPI file with typed ranges and structured errors. The terms, last revised 14 June 2024, let Cartesia train on inputs and outputs unless the customer opts out, and zero data retention is an Enterprise setting. Ink 2 has no batch endpoint and no diarisation.
Soniox Speech-to-Text
About $0.10 an hour async and $0.12 real time, with diarisation, language ID and translation included. No free credits for new accounts since October 2025.
Before you call either
Cartesia Ink
- Use
wss://api.cartesia.ai/stt/turns/websocketwithmodel=ink-2,encoding,sample_rateandcartesia_version=2026-08-14. All four are required. - Send raw mono audio in chunks of about 100 ms at the speed it was spoken. Pushing a whole file into the socket can return an internal server error.
- Read the final text from
turn.endonly.transcriptis cumulative within a turn, so joiningturn.updateevents duplicates text. - Send
{"type": "close"}after the last audio and keep reading until the server closes the socket, or the buffered tail is lost. - Check
encodingandsample_rateagainst the source before sending. The docs say the server might not return an error when they are wrong.
Soniox Speech-to-Text
- Pass
audio_urlfor public files and skip the upload step. Delete uploaded files or they count against the 10 GB quota for 30 days - Use the
contextfield for names and domain terms - Buffer audio while the WebSocket connects, then flush it after the config message
- Split anything over 300 minutes. The cap is fixed
- Set
client_reference_idso failed or duplicate requests can be traced in the usage log
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Cartesia Ink or Soniox Speech-to-Text?
Cartesia Ink scores 67.9 (B) on agent readiness against Soniox Speech-to-Text's 58.2 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Soniox Speech-to-Text leads on security & auth and transparency & trust.
Do Cartesia Ink and Soniox Speech-to-Text need an API key?
Both need an API key.
Can an agent call Cartesia Ink and Soniox Speech-to-Text without installing anything?
Yes. Cartesia Ink has a hosted endpoint at https://api.cartesia.ai and Soniox Speech-to-Text at https://api.soniox.com/v1.
Other comparisons with Cartesia Ink or Soniox Speech-to-Text
- Amazon Transcribe vs Cartesia Ink
- Amazon Transcribe vs Soniox Speech-to-Text
- AssemblyAI Speech-to-Text (Universal) vs Cartesia Ink
- AssemblyAI Speech-to-Text (Universal) vs Soniox Speech-to-Text
- Azure AI Speech speech-to-text vs Cartesia Ink
- Azure AI Speech speech-to-text vs Soniox Speech-to-Text
- Cartesia Ink vs Deepgram Speech-to-Text (Nova-3, Flux)
- Cartesia Ink vs ElevenLabs Scribe Speech to Text API
- Cartesia Ink vs Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP
- Cartesia Ink vs Google Cloud Speech-to-Text
- Cartesia Ink vs Groq Speech-to-Text
- Cartesia Ink vs Mistral Voxtral Transcribe
- Cartesia Ink vs OpenAI Speech to Text
- Cartesia Ink vs Rev AI Speech-to-Text API
- Cartesia Ink vs Speechmatics Speech-to-Text
- Deepgram Speech-to-Text (Nova-3, Flux) vs Soniox Speech-to-Text
- ElevenLabs Scribe Speech to Text API vs Soniox Speech-to-Text
- Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP vs Soniox Speech-to-Text
- Google Cloud Speech-to-Text vs Soniox Speech-to-Text
- Groq Speech-to-Text vs Soniox Speech-to-Text
- Mistral Voxtral Transcribe vs Soniox Speech-to-Text
- OpenAI Speech to Text vs Soniox Speech-to-Text
- Rev AI Speech-to-Text API vs Soniox Speech-to-Text
- Soniox Speech-to-Text vs Speechmatics Speech-to-Text
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/cartesia-ink-stt-vs-soniox-stt.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/cartesia-ink-stt.json·/api/v1/tools/soniox-stt.json - From a terminal
anchor compare cartesia-ink-stt soniox-stt(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "cartesia-ink-stt", "b": "soniox-stt"}at/mcp, no key