Head to head · Speech-to-text · October 2026 research run
Cartesia Ink vs Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP
Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP scores 69.5 (B) on agent readiness against Cartesia Ink's 67.9 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Cartesia Ink leads on reliability and maintenance & community. Both do speech-to-text.
Best speech-to-text APIs for AI agents · All 91 stt comparisons
Which one, for what
Good for Suited to voice agents that need turn detection and transcription from one model in English, French, Hindi, Japanese or Spanish, and to teams already using Cartesia text-to-speech.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 73 against 60
- Maintenance & community, 85 against 80
Watch for
The terms let Cartesia train models on inputs and outputs unless otherwise agreed. Opting out is a form in the Playground's data controls
Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP B
Good for Multilingual meetings and calls where translation, summaries and NER are wanted in one price, and for teams who want an MCP server.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 95 against 89
- Security & auth, 70 against 52
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 35
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
Starter costs $0.61 an hour async and $0.75 real time, several times the cheapest rivals
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Cartesia Ink | Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 73 | 60 | Cartesia Ink +13 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 89 | 95 | Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP +6 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 74 | 75 | Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP +1 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 52 | 70 | Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP +18 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 40 | Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 85 | 80 | Cartesia Ink +5 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 67 | 64 | Cartesia Ink +3 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 67.9 · B | 69.5 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Cartesia Ink | Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model API | Model API |
| Vendor | Cartesia | Gladia |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.cartesia.ai | https://api.gladia.io/v2 |
| Transports | HTTP, websocket, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary hosted service under the Cartesia Terms of Service. The Python and JavaScript SDKs are Apache-2.0 | MIT (SDKs and MCP server) |
| Tools exposed | none | 8 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-24 |
| Terms last updated | 2024-06-14 | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2024-06-14 | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 134 stars | 4 stars, 4.8k npm/wk, 126k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Cartesia Ink
Ink 2 streams transcripts with turn detection built into the model, documented by an AsyncAPI file with typed ranges and structured errors. The terms, last revised 14 June 2024, let Cartesia train on inputs and outputs unless the customer opts out, and zero data retention is an Enterprise setting. Ink 2 has no batch endpoint and no diarisation.
Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP
The solaria-1 model supports live and asynchronous transcription in over 100 languages with code switching. Starter pricing is $0.61 an hour for asynchronous transcription and $0.75 for real-time audio.
Before you call either
Cartesia Ink
- Use
wss://api.cartesia.ai/stt/turns/websocketwithmodel=ink-2,encoding,sample_rateandcartesia_version=2026-08-14. All four are required. - Send raw mono audio in chunks of about 100 ms at the speed it was spoken. Pushing a whole file into the socket can return an internal server error.
- Read the final text from
turn.endonly.transcriptis cumulative within a turn, so joiningturn.updateevents duplicates text. - Send
{"type": "close"}after the last audio and keep reading until the server closes the socket, or the buffered tail is lost. - Check
encodingandsample_rateagainst the source before sending. The docs say the server might not return an error when they are wrong.
Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP
- Don't resubmit a pre-recorded job after a 200 or a
transcription.createdwebhook. It's already queued - Pick
solaria-3only for async EN, FR, DE, ES or IT audio. Anything live or multilingual needssolaria-1 - A 429 means the concurrency limit, 3 async and 1 live on the free plan. Wait for a running job to finish
- Upgrade off the free plan before sending sensitive audio
- Split files over 135 minutes or 1,000 MB
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Cartesia Ink or Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP?
Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP scores 69.5 (B) on agent readiness against Cartesia Ink's 67.9 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Cartesia Ink leads on reliability and maintenance & community.
Do Cartesia Ink and Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP need an API key?
Both need an API key.
Can an agent call Cartesia Ink and Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP without installing anything?
Yes. Cartesia Ink has a hosted endpoint at https://api.cartesia.ai and Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP at https://api.gladia.io/v2.
Other comparisons with Cartesia Ink or Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP
- Amazon Transcribe vs Cartesia Ink
- Amazon Transcribe vs Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP
- AssemblyAI Speech-to-Text (Universal) vs Cartesia Ink
- AssemblyAI Speech-to-Text (Universal) vs Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP
- Azure AI Speech speech-to-text vs Cartesia Ink
- Azure AI Speech speech-to-text vs Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP
- Cartesia Ink vs Deepgram Speech-to-Text (Nova-3, Flux)
- Cartesia Ink vs ElevenLabs Scribe Speech to Text API
- Cartesia Ink vs Google Cloud Speech-to-Text
- Cartesia Ink vs Groq Speech-to-Text
- Cartesia Ink vs Mistral Voxtral Transcribe
- Cartesia Ink vs OpenAI Speech to Text
- Cartesia Ink vs Rev AI Speech-to-Text API
- Cartesia Ink vs Soniox Speech-to-Text
- Cartesia Ink vs Speechmatics Speech-to-Text
- Deepgram Speech-to-Text (Nova-3, Flux) vs Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP
- ElevenLabs Scribe Speech to Text API vs Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP
- Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP vs Google Cloud Speech-to-Text
- Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP vs Groq Speech-to-Text
- Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP vs Mistral Voxtral Transcribe
- Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP vs OpenAI Speech to Text
- Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP vs Rev AI Speech-to-Text API
- Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP vs Soniox Speech-to-Text
- Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP vs Speechmatics Speech-to-Text
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/cartesia-ink-stt-vs-gladia-stt.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/cartesia-ink-stt.json·/api/v1/tools/gladia-stt.json - From a terminal
anchor compare cartesia-ink-stt gladia-stt(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "cartesia-ink-stt", "b": "gladia-stt"}at/mcp, no key