Head to head · Speech-to-text · October 2026 research run
Cartesia Ink vs Mistral Voxtral Transcribe
Cartesia Ink scores 67.9 (B) on agent readiness against Mistral Voxtral Transcribe's 64.1 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Mistral Voxtral Transcribe leads on security & auth, payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do speech-to-text.
Best speech-to-text APIs for AI agents · All 91 stt comparisons
Which one, for what
Good for Suited to voice agents that need turn detection and transcription from one model in English, French, Hindi, Japanese or Spanish, and to teams already using Cartesia text-to-speech.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 73 against 53
- Maintenance & community, 85 against 66
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where Mistral Voxtral Transcribe loses 3 points for them
Watch for
The terms let Cartesia train models on inputs and outputs unless otherwise agreed. Opting out is a form in the Playground's data controls
Good for Suited to low-cost batch transcription with diarisation in the 13 supported languages, and to live captions or voice agents that can run without speaker labels.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 70 against 52
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 35
- Transparency & trust, 82 against 67
Watch for
Audio rate limits are named (audio seconds a minute and a month) but the numbers are shown only in the Admin Panel
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Cartesia Ink | Mistral Voxtral Transcribe | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 73 | 53 | Cartesia Ink +20 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 89 | 85 | Cartesia Ink +4 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 74 | 77 | Mistral Voxtral Transcribe +3 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 52 | 70 | Mistral Voxtral Transcribe +18 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 40 | Mistral Voxtral Transcribe +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 85 | 66 | Cartesia Ink +19 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 67 | 82 | Mistral Voxtral Transcribe +15 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -3 | |
| Total | 67.9 · B | 64.1 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Cartesia Ink | Mistral Voxtral Transcribe |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model API | Model API |
| Vendor | Cartesia | Mistral AI |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.cartesia.ai | https://api.mistral.ai/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP, websocket, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, websocket |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary hosted service under the Cartesia Terms of Service. The Python and JavaScript SDKs are Apache-2.0 | Proprietary hosted service under Mistral's commercial terms. Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime weights and the SDKs are Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-02-04 |
| Terms last updated | 2024-06-14 | 2026-09-25 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2024-06-14 | 2026-09-03 |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | yes, with an opt-out |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 134 stars | 773 stars |
Verdicts
Cartesia Ink
Ink 2 streams transcripts with turn detection built into the model, documented by an AsyncAPI file with typed ranges and structured errors. The terms, last revised 14 June 2024, let Cartesia train on inputs and outputs unless the customer opts out, and zero data retention is an Enterprise setting. Ink 2 has no batch endpoint and no diarisation.
Mistral Voxtral Transcribe
Batch transcription costs $0.003 a minute and takes one multipart call with a file, a URL or an uploaded file ID. Rate limit numbers are shown only in the console, and timestamps cannot be combined with a set language, nor diarisation with the realtime model.
Before you call either
Cartesia Ink
- Use
wss://api.cartesia.ai/stt/turns/websocketwithmodel=ink-2,encoding,sample_rateandcartesia_version=2026-08-14. All four are required. - Send raw mono audio in chunks of about 100 ms at the speed it was spoken. Pushing a whole file into the socket can return an internal server error.
- Read the final text from
turn.endonly.transcriptis cumulative within a turn, so joiningturn.updateevents duplicates text. - Send
{"type": "close"}after the last audio and keep reading until the server closes the socket, or the buffered tail is lost. - Check
encodingandsample_rateagainst the source before sending. The docs say the server might not return an error when they are wrong.
Mistral Voxtral Transcribe
- Send
model=voxtral-mini-latestand one offile,file_urlorfile_idas multipart form fields to/v1/audio/transcriptions - Leave
languageout when you ask fortimestamp_granularities, the docs say the two are not compatible - Use the batch endpoint for diarisation.
voxtral-mini-transcribe-realtime-2602does not acceptdiarize - Pin
voxtral-mini-2602if output must not change, since-latestaliases can move - Mint browser tokens with
POST /v1/client/sessionsclose to connection time and pass them inSec-WebSocket-Protocol, never the API key
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Cartesia Ink or Mistral Voxtral Transcribe?
Cartesia Ink scores 67.9 (B) on agent readiness against Mistral Voxtral Transcribe's 64.1 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Mistral Voxtral Transcribe leads on security & auth, payments & pricing and transparency & trust.
Do Cartesia Ink and Mistral Voxtral Transcribe need an API key?
Both need an API key.
Can an agent call Cartesia Ink and Mistral Voxtral Transcribe without installing anything?
Yes. Cartesia Ink has a hosted endpoint at https://api.cartesia.ai and Mistral Voxtral Transcribe at https://api.mistral.ai/v1.
Other comparisons with Cartesia Ink or Mistral Voxtral Transcribe
- Amazon Transcribe vs Cartesia Ink
- Amazon Transcribe vs Mistral Voxtral Transcribe
- AssemblyAI Speech-to-Text (Universal) vs Cartesia Ink
- AssemblyAI Speech-to-Text (Universal) vs Mistral Voxtral Transcribe
- Azure AI Speech speech-to-text vs Cartesia Ink
- Azure AI Speech speech-to-text vs Mistral Voxtral Transcribe
- Cartesia Ink vs Deepgram Speech-to-Text (Nova-3, Flux)
- Cartesia Ink vs ElevenLabs Scribe Speech to Text API
- Cartesia Ink vs Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP
- Cartesia Ink vs Google Cloud Speech-to-Text
- Cartesia Ink vs Groq Speech-to-Text
- Cartesia Ink vs OpenAI Speech to Text
- Cartesia Ink vs Rev AI Speech-to-Text API
- Cartesia Ink vs Soniox Speech-to-Text
- Cartesia Ink vs Speechmatics Speech-to-Text
- Deepgram Speech-to-Text (Nova-3, Flux) vs Mistral Voxtral Transcribe
- ElevenLabs Scribe Speech to Text API vs Mistral Voxtral Transcribe
- Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP vs Mistral Voxtral Transcribe
- Google Cloud Speech-to-Text vs Mistral Voxtral Transcribe
- Groq Speech-to-Text vs Mistral Voxtral Transcribe
- Mistral Voxtral Transcribe vs OpenAI Speech to Text
- Mistral Voxtral Transcribe vs Rev AI Speech-to-Text API
- Mistral Voxtral Transcribe vs Soniox Speech-to-Text
- Mistral Voxtral Transcribe vs Speechmatics Speech-to-Text
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/cartesia-ink-stt-vs-mistral-voxtral-transcribe.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/cartesia-ink-stt.json·/api/v1/tools/mistral-voxtral-transcribe.json - From a terminal
anchor compare cartesia-ink-stt mistral-voxtral-transcribe(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "cartesia-ink-stt", "b": "mistral-voxtral-transcribe"}at/mcp, no key