Head to head · Speech-to-text · October 2026 research run
Cartesia Ink vs Google Cloud Speech-to-Text
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text scores 70.2 (BB) on agent readiness against Cartesia Ink's 67.9 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Cartesia Ink leads on schema & documentation, payments & pricing and maintenance & community. Both do speech-to-text.
Best speech-to-text APIs for AI agents · All 91 stt comparisons
Which one, for what
Good for Suited to voice agents that need turn detection and transcription from one model in English, French, Hindi, Japanese or Spanish, and to teams already using Cartesia text-to-speech.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 89 against 80
- Payments & pricing, 35 against 20
- Maintenance & community, 85 against 25
Watch for
The terms let Cartesia train models on inputs and outputs unless otherwise agreed. Opting out is a form in the Playground's data controls
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text BB
Good for Google Cloud teams with audio already in Cloud Storage who want no training and no retention by default.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 85 against 73
- Security & auth, 95 against 52
- Transparency & trust, 86 against 67
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
Watch for
No release note since 2025-11-13
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Cartesia Ink | Google Cloud Speech-to-Text | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 73 | 85 | Google Cloud Speech-to-Text +12 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 89 | 80 | Cartesia Ink +9 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 74 | 70 | Cartesia Ink +4 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 52 | 95 | Google Cloud Speech-to-Text +43 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 20 | Cartesia Ink +15 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 85 | 25 | Cartesia Ink +60 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 67 | 86 | Google Cloud Speech-to-Text +19 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 67.9 · B | 70.2 · BB |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Cartesia Ink | Google Cloud Speech-to-Text |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model API | Model API |
| Vendor | Cartesia | Google Cloud |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.cartesia.ai | https://speech.googleapis.com/v2 |
| Transports | HTTP, websocket, Streamable HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary hosted service under the Cartesia Terms of Service. The Python and JavaScript SDKs are Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 (SDKs) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-28 |
| Terms last updated | 2024-06-14 | 2026-09-02 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2024-06-14 | 2026-10-01 |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 134 stars | 713k npm/wk, 3.7M PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Cartesia Ink
Ink 2 streams transcripts with turn detection built into the model, documented by an AsyncAPI file with typed ranges and structured errors. The terms, last revised 14 June 2024, let Cartesia train on inputs and outputs unless the customer opts out, and zero data retention is an Enterprise setting. Ink 2 has no batch endpoint and no diarisation.
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text
Audio isn't stored or used for training unless the project opts in to data logging. No release note since 2025-11-13.
Before you call either
Cartesia Ink
- Use
wss://api.cartesia.ai/stt/turns/websocketwithmodel=ink-2,encoding,sample_rateandcartesia_version=2026-08-14. All four are required. - Send raw mono audio in chunks of about 100 ms at the speed it was spoken. Pushing a whole file into the socket can return an internal server error.
- Read the final text from
turn.endonly.transcriptis cumulative within a turn, so joiningturn.updateevents duplicates text. - Send
{"type": "close"}after the last audio and keep reading until the server closes the socket, or the buffered tail is lost. - Check
encodingandsample_rateagainst the source before sending. The docs say the server might not return an error when they are wrong.
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text
- Call Chirp 3 on the
usoreuendpoint. It isn't listed for thegloballocation - Reopen streams before the 5-minute limit, or use
BatchRecognizefor recordings - Downmix stereo unless you need channel labels, since each channel is billed
- Set dynamic batch on offline jobs to cut the price from $0.016 to $0.003 a minute
- Back off on
RESOURCE_EXHAUSTED. The Speech docs don't give a retry interval
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Cartesia Ink or Google Cloud Speech-to-Text?
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text scores 70.2 (BB) on agent readiness against Cartesia Ink's 67.9 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Cartesia Ink leads on schema & documentation, payments & pricing and maintenance & community.
Do Cartesia Ink and Google Cloud Speech-to-Text need an API key?
Cartesia Ink needs an API key. Google Cloud Speech-to-Text uses an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Cartesia Ink and Google Cloud Speech-to-Text without installing anything?
Yes. Cartesia Ink has a hosted endpoint at https://api.cartesia.ai and Google Cloud Speech-to-Text at https://speech.googleapis.com/v2.
Other comparisons with Cartesia Ink or Google Cloud Speech-to-Text
- Amazon Transcribe vs Cartesia Ink
- Amazon Transcribe vs Google Cloud Speech-to-Text
- AssemblyAI Speech-to-Text (Universal) vs Cartesia Ink
- AssemblyAI Speech-to-Text (Universal) vs Google Cloud Speech-to-Text
- Azure AI Speech speech-to-text vs Cartesia Ink
- Azure AI Speech speech-to-text vs Google Cloud Speech-to-Text
- Cartesia Ink vs Deepgram Speech-to-Text (Nova-3, Flux)
- Cartesia Ink vs ElevenLabs Scribe Speech to Text API
- Cartesia Ink vs Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP
- Cartesia Ink vs Groq Speech-to-Text
- Cartesia Ink vs Mistral Voxtral Transcribe
- Cartesia Ink vs OpenAI Speech to Text
- Cartesia Ink vs Rev AI Speech-to-Text API
- Cartesia Ink vs Soniox Speech-to-Text
- Cartesia Ink vs Speechmatics Speech-to-Text
- Deepgram Speech-to-Text (Nova-3, Flux) vs Google Cloud Speech-to-Text
- ElevenLabs Scribe Speech to Text API vs Google Cloud Speech-to-Text
- Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP vs Google Cloud Speech-to-Text
- Google Cloud Speech-to-Text vs Groq Speech-to-Text
- Google Cloud Speech-to-Text vs Mistral Voxtral Transcribe
- Google Cloud Speech-to-Text vs OpenAI Speech to Text
- Google Cloud Speech-to-Text vs Rev AI Speech-to-Text API
- Google Cloud Speech-to-Text vs Soniox Speech-to-Text
- Google Cloud Speech-to-Text vs Speechmatics Speech-to-Text
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/cartesia-ink-stt-vs-google-speech-to-text.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/cartesia-ink-stt.json·/api/v1/tools/google-speech-to-text.json - From a terminal
anchor compare cartesia-ink-stt google-speech-to-text(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "cartesia-ink-stt", "b": "google-speech-to-text"}at/mcp, no key