Head to head · Sandbox code · October 2026 research run
Blaxel Sandboxes vs Runloop Devboxes
Runloop Devboxes has a score of 65 (B) against Blaxel Sandboxes's 61 (C). Both do sandbox code. The largest gap is reliability, 25 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Blaxel Sandboxes for
- transparency & trust (+17)
Pick Runloop Devboxes for
- reliability (+25)
- schema & documentation (+5)
- payments & pricing (+10)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Blaxel Sandboxes | Runloop Devboxes | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 35 | 60 | Runloop Devboxes +25 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 80 | 85 | Runloop Devboxes +5 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 70 | 66 | Blaxel Sandboxes +4 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 64 | 60 | Blaxel Sandboxes +4 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 50 | Runloop Devboxes +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 85 | 83 | Blaxel Sandboxes +2 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 68 | 51 | Blaxel Sandboxes +17 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 61 · C | 65 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Blaxel Sandboxes | Runloop Devboxes |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Blaxel | Runloop |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.blaxel.ai/v0 | https://api.runloop.ai |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-30 | 2026-09-08 |
| Popularity | 27 stars, 353k npm/wk, 75k PyPI/wk | 34 stars, 23k npm/wk, 136k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Blaxel Sandboxes
No compute charge in standby, only $0.20 a GB-month of snapshot storage. 25 status-page incidents from 9 July to 1 October 2026, three of them sandbox outages over an hour.
Runloop Devboxes
Gateway credentials remain on Runloop servers, with access tokens bound to one devbox. Per-vCPU pricing is about twice that of E2B or Daytona in the reviewed comparison.
Before you call either
Blaxel Sandboxes
- Close WebSocket and terminal connections when done. An open connection keeps the sandbox active and billed
- Set a TTL or idle expiry on throwaway sandboxes. The default is to keep them
- Set
forbiddenDomainsor an allow list at creation, withnetwork.firewallfor tools that ignore proxy settings. Both can only be set when the sandbox is created - Retry only on WORKLOAD_UNAVAILABLE. The error reference says other codes won't succeed on retry
- Connect to
<sandbox URL>/mcpwith your API key instead of wrapping the REST API in tools yourself
Runloop Devboxes
- Set an idle policy (
idle_time_secondswithon_idle: suspend) so a forgotten devbox stops billing compute - Route outbound API calls through an agent gateway instead of putting keys in the devbox environment
- Attach a network policy with
allow_all=Falsebefore running untrusted code. Egress is open by default - Restart background services after every resume. Nothing in memory survives
- Expect a 1-hour keep-alive cap and 3 concurrent devboxes while on the trial
Other comparisons with Blaxel Sandboxes or Runloop Devboxes
- Blaxel Sandboxes vs Cloudflare Sandbox SDK
- Blaxel Sandboxes vs Daytona
- Blaxel Sandboxes vs E2B
- Blaxel Sandboxes vs Modal Sandboxes
- Blaxel Sandboxes vs Vercel Sandbox
- Cloudflare Sandbox SDK vs Runloop Devboxes
- Daytona vs Runloop Devboxes
- E2B vs Runloop Devboxes
- Modal Sandboxes vs Runloop Devboxes
- Runloop Devboxes vs Vercel Sandbox
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/blaxel-sandboxes.json·/api/v1/tools/runloop.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/blaxel-sandboxes-vs-runloop.md