Head to head · Sandbox code · October 2026 research run
Blaxel Sandboxes vs Cloudflare Sandbox SDK
Cloudflare Sandbox SDK has a score of 67.8 (B) against Blaxel Sandboxes's 61 (C). Both do sandbox code. The largest gap is reliability, 52 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Blaxel Sandboxes for
- agent ergonomics (+7)
- payments & pricing (+10)
- maintenance & community (+15)
Pick Cloudflare Sandbox SDK for
- reliability (+52)
- transparency & trust (+5)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Blaxel Sandboxes | Cloudflare Sandbox SDK | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 35 | 87 | Cloudflare Sandbox SDK +52 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 80 | 77 | Blaxel Sandboxes +3 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 70 | 63 | Blaxel Sandboxes +7 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 64 | 65 | Cloudflare Sandbox SDK +1 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 30 | Blaxel Sandboxes +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 85 | 70 | Blaxel Sandboxes +15 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 68 | 73 | Cloudflare Sandbox SDK +5 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 61 · C | 67.8 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Blaxel Sandboxes | Cloudflare Sandbox SDK |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | SDK + MCP |
| Vendor | Blaxel | Cloudflare |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.blaxel.ai/v0 | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | |
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-30 | 2026-09-30 |
| Popularity | 27 stars, 353k npm/wk, 75k PyPI/wk | 1.1k stars, 723k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Blaxel Sandboxes
No compute charge in standby, only $0.20 a GB-month of snapshot storage. 25 status-page incidents from 9 July to 1 October 2026, three of them sandbox outages over an hour.
Cloudflare Sandbox SDK
Each sandbox runs in its own VM with a separate filesystem, process space and network stack. No hosted API. You deploy and secure a Worker before an agent can call anything, and the starter has no auth.
Before you call either
Blaxel Sandboxes
- Close WebSocket and terminal connections when done. An open connection keeps the sandbox active and billed
- Set a TTL or idle expiry on throwaway sandboxes. The default is to keep them
- Set
forbiddenDomainsor an allow list at creation, withnetwork.firewallfor tools that ignore proxy settings. Both can only be set when the sandbox is created - Retry only on WORKLOAD_UNAVAILABLE. The error reference says other codes won't succeed on retry
- Connect to
<sandbox URL>/mcpwith your API key instead of wrapping the REST API in tools yourself
Cloudflare Sandbox SDK
- Derive the sandbox ID from the authenticated user, as the docs advise. IDs aren't secrets
- Put API keys in an outbound handler in the Worker, not in the container's environment
- Set
enableInternet = falseor anallowedHostslist before running untrusted code. Internet access is on by default - Check that a restored backup has every directory you expect. Backups of 10 MB or more have open bugs
- Start new projects on 1.0. The 0.x library only gets fixes until 31 December 2026
Other comparisons with Blaxel Sandboxes or Cloudflare Sandbox SDK
- Blaxel Sandboxes vs Daytona
- Blaxel Sandboxes vs E2B
- Blaxel Sandboxes vs Modal Sandboxes
- Blaxel Sandboxes vs Runloop Devboxes
- Blaxel Sandboxes vs Vercel Sandbox
- Cloudflare Sandbox SDK vs Daytona
- Cloudflare Sandbox SDK vs E2B
- Cloudflare Sandbox SDK vs Modal Sandboxes
- Cloudflare Sandbox SDK vs Runloop Devboxes
- Cloudflare Sandbox SDK vs Vercel Sandbox