Head to head · Sandbox code · October 2026 research run
Cloudflare Sandbox SDK vs Runloop Devboxes
Cloudflare Sandbox SDK has a score of 67.8 (B) against Runloop Devboxes's 65 (B). Both do sandbox code. The largest gap is reliability, 27 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Cloudflare Sandbox SDK for
- reliability (+27)
- security & auth (+5)
- transparency & trust (+22)
Pick Runloop Devboxes for
- schema & documentation (+8)
- payments & pricing (+20)
- maintenance & community (+13)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Cloudflare Sandbox SDK | Runloop Devboxes | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 87 | 60 | Cloudflare Sandbox SDK +27 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 77 | 85 | Runloop Devboxes +8 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 63 | 66 | Runloop Devboxes +3 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 65 | 60 | Cloudflare Sandbox SDK +5 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 50 | Runloop Devboxes +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 70 | 83 | Runloop Devboxes +13 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 73 | 51 | Cloudflare Sandbox SDK +22 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 67.8 · B | 65 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Cloudflare Sandbox SDK | Runloop Devboxes |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | SDK + MCP | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Cloudflare | Runloop |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.runloop.ai |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | None | API key |
| Pricing | Paid | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-30 | 2026-09-08 |
| Popularity | 1.1k stars, 723k npm/wk | 34 stars, 23k npm/wk, 136k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Cloudflare Sandbox SDK
Each sandbox runs in its own VM with a separate filesystem, process space and network stack. No hosted API. You deploy and secure a Worker before an agent can call anything, and the starter has no auth.
Runloop Devboxes
Gateway credentials remain on Runloop servers, with access tokens bound to one devbox. Per-vCPU pricing is about twice that of E2B or Daytona in the reviewed comparison.
Before you call either
Cloudflare Sandbox SDK
- Derive the sandbox ID from the authenticated user, as the docs advise. IDs aren't secrets
- Put API keys in an outbound handler in the Worker, not in the container's environment
- Set
enableInternet = falseor anallowedHostslist before running untrusted code. Internet access is on by default - Check that a restored backup has every directory you expect. Backups of 10 MB or more have open bugs
- Start new projects on 1.0. The 0.x library only gets fixes until 31 December 2026
Runloop Devboxes
- Set an idle policy (
idle_time_secondswithon_idle: suspend) so a forgotten devbox stops billing compute - Route outbound API calls through an agent gateway instead of putting keys in the devbox environment
- Attach a network policy with
allow_all=Falsebefore running untrusted code. Egress is open by default - Restart background services after every resume. Nothing in memory survives
- Expect a 1-hour keep-alive cap and 3 concurrent devboxes while on the trial
Other comparisons with Cloudflare Sandbox SDK or Runloop Devboxes
- Blaxel Sandboxes vs Cloudflare Sandbox SDK
- Blaxel Sandboxes vs Runloop Devboxes
- Cloudflare Sandbox SDK vs Daytona
- Cloudflare Sandbox SDK vs E2B
- Cloudflare Sandbox SDK vs Modal Sandboxes
- Cloudflare Sandbox SDK vs Vercel Sandbox
- Daytona vs Runloop Devboxes
- E2B vs Runloop Devboxes
- Modal Sandboxes vs Runloop Devboxes
- Runloop Devboxes vs Vercel Sandbox