Head to head · Sandbox code · October 2026 research run
Modal Sandboxes vs Runloop Devboxes
Modal Sandboxes has a score of 75.6 (BB) against Runloop Devboxes's 65 (B). Both do sandbox code. The largest gap is reliability, 35 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Modal Sandboxes for
- reliability (+35)
- security & auth (+16)
- maintenance & community (+10)
- transparency & trust (+23)
Pick Runloop Devboxes for
- schema & documentation (+6)
- payments & pricing (+10)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Modal Sandboxes | Runloop Devboxes | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 95 | 60 | Modal Sandboxes +35 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 79 | 85 | Runloop Devboxes +6 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 67 | 66 | Modal Sandboxes +1 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 76 | 60 | Modal Sandboxes +16 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 50 | Runloop Devboxes +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 93 | 83 | Modal Sandboxes +10 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 74 | 51 | Modal Sandboxes +23 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 75.6 · BB | 65 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Modal Sandboxes | Runloop Devboxes |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | SDK + MCP | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Modal | Runloop |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.runloop.ai |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-28 | 2026-09-08 |
| Popularity | 514 stars, 941k npm/wk, 10.1M PyPI/wk | 34 stars, 23k npm/wk, 136k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.3/5 (8) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Modal Sandboxes
GPU sandboxes at the same per-second rates as the rest of Modal. No REST API, and the JavaScript and Go SDKs are beta.
Runloop Devboxes
Gateway credentials remain on Runloop servers, with access tokens bound to one devbox. Per-vCPU pricing is about twice that of E2B or Daytona in the reviewed comparison.
Before you call either
Modal Sandboxes
- Pass
timeout=when you create a sandbox. The default lifetime is 5 minutes - Set
block_network=Trueor acidr_allowlistfor untrusted code - Give a sandbox a
nameso a retried create raisesAlreadyExistsErrorinstead of starting a second one - Snapshot the filesystem before the 24-hour limit and start a fresh sandbox from it
- Catch
ResourceExhaustedErrorfromSandbox.create()on SDK 1.6.0 and later
Runloop Devboxes
- Set an idle policy (
idle_time_secondswithon_idle: suspend) so a forgotten devbox stops billing compute - Route outbound API calls through an agent gateway instead of putting keys in the devbox environment
- Attach a network policy with
allow_all=Falsebefore running untrusted code. Egress is open by default - Restart background services after every resume. Nothing in memory survives
- Expect a 1-hour keep-alive cap and 3 concurrent devboxes while on the trial
Other comparisons with Modal Sandboxes or Runloop Devboxes
- Blaxel Sandboxes vs Modal Sandboxes
- Blaxel Sandboxes vs Runloop Devboxes
- Cloudflare Sandbox SDK vs Modal Sandboxes
- Cloudflare Sandbox SDK vs Runloop Devboxes
- Daytona vs Modal Sandboxes
- Daytona vs Runloop Devboxes
- E2B vs Modal Sandboxes
- E2B vs Runloop Devboxes
- Modal Sandboxes vs Vercel Sandbox
- Runloop Devboxes vs Vercel Sandbox
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/modal-sandboxes.json·/api/v1/tools/runloop.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/modal-sandboxes-vs-runloop.md