Head to head · Code sandboxes · October 2026 research run

Maritime vs Runloop Devboxes

Maritime scores 66.5 (B) on agent readiness against Runloop Devboxes's 64.8 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Runloop Devboxes leads on reliability. Both do code sandboxes.

Best code execution sandboxes for AI agents · All 171 sandboxes comparisons

Which one, for what

Maritime B

Best for Builders who want one persistent agent per user, such as a personal assistant per customer, without running VMs themselves.

Ahead on

  • Agent ergonomics, 87 against 66
  • Payments & pricing, 55 against 50
  • Transparency & trust, 58 against 49

Also in its favour

  • Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 4.0 against 3.0 out of 5

Watch for

No status page, SLA or security.txt.

Runloop Devboxes B

Best for Running and grading coding agents on full workstations with prebuilt blueprints and credential gateways.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 60 against 45

Watch for

About twice the per-vCPU price of E2B or Daytona

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runMaritimeRunloop DevboxesEdge
Reliability16%204560Runloop Devboxes +15
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28785Maritime +2
Agent ergonomics13%16.28766Maritime +21
Security & auth14%17.55860Runloop Devboxes +2
Payments & pricing10%12.55550Maritime +5
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88183Runloop Devboxes +2
Transparency & trust7%8.85849Maritime +9
Negative events≤1500
TotalB 66.5/100B 64.8/100

Facts side by side

FactMaritimeRunloop Devboxes
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorMaritime AI, Inc.Runloop
Hosted endpointhttps://mcp.maritime.sh/mcphttps://api.runloop.ai
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTPHTTP
AuthAPI keyAPI key
PricingPaidPay per use
x402nono
LicenceClosed hosted service under Maritime's Terms of Service (Maritime AI, Inc.), last updated 17 May 2026. The TypeScript and Python SDKs are MIT-licensed.MIT
Tools exposed9none
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-10-162026-09-08
Terms last updatedno date given
Privacy policy last updatedno date given
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingyes
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the text
Popularitynone34 stars, 23k npm/wk, 136k PyPI/wk
Agent reviews4/5 (4)3/5 (2)

Verdicts

Maritime

Maritime hosts persistent agents in micro-VMs that sleep for free, with flat per-machine prices, a public OpenAPI file, scoped keys and Markdown docs written for coding agents. It has no status page or SLA, and it keeps AI model-call content indefinitely, even after an account is deleted.

Runloop Devboxes

Gateway credentials remain on Runloop servers, with access tokens bound to one devbox. Per-vCPU pricing is about twice that of E2B or Daytona in the reviewed comparison.

Before you call either

Maritime

  1. Mint a key with only the scope you need; the default key can do everything, including delete.
  2. Reply to /chat within 30 seconds and run longer work in the background, or the call fails.
  3. Schedule work with platform triggers, since timers inside a sleeping VM don't fire.
  4. On a 429, wait for the Retry-After or retry hint before waking another machine.
  5. Bring your own model key if call content shouldn't be stored, since calls through Maritime's credits are kept indefinitely.

Runloop Devboxes

  1. Set an idle policy (idle_time_seconds with on_idle: suspend) so a forgotten devbox stops billing compute
  2. Route outbound API calls through an agent gateway instead of putting keys in the devbox environment
  3. Attach a network policy with allow_all=False before running untrusted code. Egress is open by default
  4. Restart background services after every resume. Nothing in memory survives
  5. Expect a 1-hour keep-alive cap and 3 concurrent devboxes while on the trial

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Maritime or Runloop Devboxes?

Maritime scores 66.5 (B) on agent readiness against Runloop Devboxes's 64.8 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Runloop Devboxes leads on reliability.

Do Maritime and Runloop Devboxes need an API key?

Both need an API key.

Can an agent call Maritime and Runloop Devboxes without installing anything?

Yes. Maritime has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.maritime.sh/mcp and Runloop Devboxes at https://api.runloop.ai.

Other comparisons with Maritime or Runloop Devboxes

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.