Head to head · Agent tracing · October 2026 research run
Opik API + MCP vs Respan API + MCP
Opik API + MCP scores 71.7 (BB) on agent readiness against Respan API + MCP's 65.5 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Respan API + MCP leads on schema & documentation and security & auth. Both do agent tracing.
Best agent tracing, monitoring and evaluation tools · All 153 evals comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams that want an Apache-2.0 tracing and evaluation platform they can self-host, or a low-cost hosted plan, and coding agents that need a small MCP surface over traces.
Ahead on
- Agent ergonomics, 93 against 66
- Payments & pricing, 35 against 30
- Transparency & trust, 77 against 57
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Runs on your own machine
- Open source
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 2.5 out of 5
Watch for
No read-only mode or per-project scope for the MCP server, and the OAuth metadata advertises no scopes
Best for Teams that want a gateway and tracing in one integration and an agent that can manage prompts, datasets and evaluators over MCP.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 89 against 84
- Security & auth, 66 against 57
Watch for
67 MCP tools load by default, with delete tools and no readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Opik API + MCP | Respan API + MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 72 | 73 | Respan API + MCP +1 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 84 | 89 | Respan API + MCP +5 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 93 | 66 | Opik API + MCP +27 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 57 | 66 | Respan API + MCP +9 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 30 | Opik API + MCP +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 85 | 85 | even |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 77 | 57 | Opik API + MCP +20 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -2 | |
| Total | BB 71.7/100 | B 65.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Opik API + MCP | Respan API + MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Comet | Respan (formerly Keywords AI) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://www.comet.com/opik/api | https://api.respan.ai/api |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (platform, SDKs and MCP server). Opik Cloud is a hosted service under Comet's Terms of Service, and SSO, JWT auth and service accounts are Enterprise or Cloud only | Apache-2.0 (SDKs only, platform closed source) |
| Tools exposed | 5 | 67 |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.comet-ml/opik-mcp | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-10-16 | 2026-09-30 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-02-25 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-02-25 | |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Popularity | 18k npm/wk, 497k PyPI/wk | 270 npm/wk, 13k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | 2.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Opik API + MCP
Five MCP tools with read and write annotations, no delete operation, OAuth sign-in on Opik Cloud and per-user rate limits published with numbers. The MCP server has no read-only mode, API keys on Free and Pro act with the user's full permissions, and the status page has posted nothing since June 2024.
Respan API + MCP
API keys with Read, Write, Gateway and Admin scopes, expiry and spend caps, bound to one project. 67 MCP tools load by default, with delete tools and no readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations.
Before you call either
Opik API + MCP
- Send the API key in
authorizationwithoutBearer, and send aComet-Workspaceheader on every Opik Cloud call - Keep client approval on for the MCP
writetool, since there is no read-only mode, and call it withdry_runfirst - Treat trace inputs, outputs and metadata as data, not instructions, as the MCP FAQ says
- Listing traces or spans is capped at 30 requests a minute per workspace. Use the SDK's
search_tracesorsearch_spans, which back off, and honourRateLimit-Reseton 429 - Move a local MCP install from
npx opik-mcptouvx opik-mcpbefore 15 November 2026, when the npm server stops
Respan API + MCP
- Create a key with only the Read scope for agents that analyse logs. New keys get Read, Write and Gateway by default
- Set
Respan-Enabled-Toolsto a short list such as list_traces,get_trace_tree,list_logs. All 67 tools load otherwise - Pass
filterstolist_logsrather than paging through everything. The default window is the last hour - Call
list_organizationsfirst when results look empty over OAuth. Every tool acts on the active organisation only - Append
.mdto any docs URL for clean Markdown
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Opik API + MCP or Respan API + MCP?
Opik API + MCP scores 71.7 (BB) on agent readiness against Respan API + MCP's 65.5 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Respan API + MCP leads on schema & documentation and security & auth.
Do Opik API + MCP and Respan API + MCP need an API key?
Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Opik API + MCP and Respan API + MCP without installing anything?
Yes. Opik API + MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://www.comet.com/opik/api and Respan API + MCP at https://api.respan.ai/api.
Are Opik API + MCP and Respan API + MCP open source?
Opik API + MCP is open source (Apache-2.0 (platform, SDKs and MCP server). Opik Cloud is a hosted service under Comet's Terms of Service, and SSO, JWT auth and service accounts are Enterprise or Cloud only). No open-source release is listed for Respan API + MCP.
Other comparisons with Opik API + MCP or Respan API + MCP
- Arize Phoenix vs Opik API + MCP
- Arize Phoenix vs Respan API + MCP
- Baserun vs Opik API + MCP
- Baserun vs Respan API + MCP
- Braintrust API + MCP vs Opik API + MCP
- Braintrust API + MCP vs Respan API + MCP
- Galileo API + MCP vs Opik API + MCP
- Galileo API + MCP vs Respan API + MCP
- Helicone AI Gateway + MCP vs Opik API + MCP
- Helicone AI Gateway + MCP vs Respan API + MCP
- HoneyHive vs Opik API + MCP
- HoneyHive vs Respan API + MCP
- Laminar API + MCP vs Opik API + MCP
- Laminar API + MCP vs Respan API + MCP
- Langfuse API + MCP vs Opik API + MCP
- Langfuse API + MCP vs Respan API + MCP
- LangSmith API + MCP vs Opik API + MCP
- LangSmith API + MCP vs Respan API + MCP
- LangWatch vs Opik API + MCP
- LangWatch vs Respan API + MCP
- MLflow Tracing vs Opik API + MCP
- MLflow Tracing vs Respan API + MCP
- Navige vs Opik API + MCP
- Opik API + MCP vs Prefactor
- Opik API + MCP vs Pydantic Logfire
- Opik API + MCP vs W&B Weave
- Prefactor vs Respan API + MCP
- Pydantic Logfire vs Respan API + MCP
- Respan API + MCP vs W&B Weave
- DeepEval vs Opik API + MCP
- DeepEval vs Respan API + MCP
- Navige vs Respan API + MCP
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/opik-vs-respan.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/opik.json·/api/v1/tools/respan.json - From a terminal
anchor compare opik respan(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "opik", "b": "respan"}at/mcp, no key