Head to head · Evaluations · October 2026 research run
DeepEval vs Respan API + MCP
Respan API + MCP and DeepEval score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 65.5 (B) and 64.7 (B). DeepEval leads on agent ergonomics, payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do evaluations.
Best agent tracing, monitoring and evaluation tools · All 120 evals comparisons
Which one, for what
DeepEval B
Good for Teams that want evaluations in pytest or a CLI on their own machines, with agent, RAG, multi-turn and MCP metrics.
Ahead on
- Agent ergonomics, 72 against 66
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 30
- Transparency & trust, 63 against 57
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
- Open source
Watch for
The 25 most recent Py Core Tests runs had failed when read on 9 October 2026, two of them pushes to main. Issue #3372 of 26 September reports the same
Good for Teams that want a gateway and tracing in one integration and an agent that can manage prompts, datasets and evaluators over MCP.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 73 against 59
- Schema & documentation, 89 against 78
- Security & auth, 66 against 47
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
67 MCP tools load by default, with delete tools and no readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | DeepEval | Respan API + MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 59 | 73 | Respan API + MCP +14 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 78 | 89 | Respan API + MCP +11 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 72 | 66 | DeepEval +6 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 47 | 66 | Respan API + MCP +19 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 30 | DeepEval +30 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 83 | 85 | Respan API + MCP +2 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 63 | 57 | DeepEval +6 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -2 | |
| Total | 64.7 · B | 65.5 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | DeepEval | Respan API + MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | SDK + MCP | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Confident AI, Inc. | Respan (formerly Keywords AI) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.respan.ai/api |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache 2.0 for the Python and TypeScript packages and the agent skills. Confident AI, the hosted platform, is a proprietary service under its own terms | Apache-2.0 (SDKs only, platform closed source) |
| Tools exposed | none | 67 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-02 | 2026-09-30 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2026-02-25 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2026-02-25 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Popularity | 19k stars, 35k npm/wk, 736k PyPI/wk | 270 npm/wk, 13k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
DeepEval
DeepEval runs evaluations and tracing locally under Apache 2.0 with no account, and writes each test run to JSON or SQLite. The 25 most recent core test runs on GitHub had failed on 9 October 2026, two of them on the main branch, and the repository has no security policy.
Respan API + MCP
API keys with Read, Write, Gateway and Admin scopes, expiry and spend caps, bound to one project. 67 MCP tools load by default, with delete tools and no readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations.
Before you call either
DeepEval
- Set
DEEPEVAL_TELEMETRY_OPT_OUT=1before the first run if usage events and the public IP address should not go to PostHog - Set a judge model key such as
OPENAI_API_KEY, or use the non-LLM metrics. Most metrics call an LLM judge and bill the owner's provider account - Review thresholds for
BiasMetric,HallucinationMetric,MisuseMetricandToxicityMetricwhen upgrading past 4.2.0. Higher scores now mean better - Read results from
.deepeval/.latest_run_full.jsonor aresults_folder.deepeval inspectopens a terminal interface meant for a person - Pass an existing key with
deepeval login --api-keyin CI. Plaindeepeval loginopens a browser, and results then upload to Confident AI
Respan API + MCP
- Create a key with only the Read scope for agents that analyse logs. New keys get Read, Write and Gateway by default
- Set
Respan-Enabled-Toolsto a short list such as list_traces,get_trace_tree,list_logs. All 67 tools load otherwise - Pass
filterstolist_logsrather than paging through everything. The default window is the last hour - Call
list_organizationsfirst when results look empty over OAuth. Every tool acts on the active organisation only - Append
.mdto any docs URL for clean Markdown
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, DeepEval or Respan API + MCP?
Respan API + MCP and DeepEval score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 65.5 (B) and 64.7 (B). DeepEval leads on agent ergonomics, payments & pricing and transparency & trust.
Can an agent call DeepEval and Respan API + MCP without installing anything?
No hosted endpoint is listed for DeepEval. Respan API + MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://api.respan.ai/api.
Are DeepEval and Respan API + MCP open source?
DeepEval is open source (Apache 2.0 for the Python and TypeScript packages and the agent skills. Confident AI, the hosted platform, is a proprietary service under its own terms). No open-source release is listed for Respan API + MCP.
Other comparisons with DeepEval or Respan API + MCP
- Arize Phoenix vs DeepEval
- Arize Phoenix vs Respan API + MCP
- Baserun vs DeepEval
- Baserun vs Respan API + MCP
- Braintrust API + MCP vs DeepEval
- Braintrust API + MCP vs Respan API + MCP
- Galileo API + MCP vs Respan API + MCP
- Helicone AI Gateway + MCP vs Respan API + MCP
- HoneyHive vs Respan API + MCP
- Laminar API + MCP vs Respan API + MCP
- Langfuse API + MCP vs Respan API + MCP
- LangSmith API + MCP vs Respan API + MCP
- LangWatch vs Respan API + MCP
- MLflow Tracing vs Respan API + MCP
- Prefactor vs Respan API + MCP
- Pydantic Logfire vs Respan API + MCP
- Respan API + MCP vs W&B Weave
- DeepEval vs Galileo API + MCP
- DeepEval vs Helicone AI Gateway + MCP
- DeepEval vs HoneyHive
- DeepEval vs Laminar API + MCP
- DeepEval vs Langfuse API + MCP
- DeepEval vs LangSmith API + MCP
- DeepEval vs LangWatch
- DeepEval vs MLflow Tracing
- DeepEval vs Prefactor
- DeepEval vs Pydantic Logfire
- DeepEval vs W&B Weave
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/deepeval-vs-respan.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/deepeval.json·/api/v1/tools/respan.json - From a terminal
anchor compare deepeval respan(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "deepeval", "b": "respan"}at/mcp, no key