Head to head · Evaluations · October 2026 research run
DeepEval vs W&B Weave
W&B Weave scores 66.7 (B) on agent readiness against DeepEval's 64.7 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. DeepEval leads on payments & pricing. Both do evaluations.
Best agent tracing, monitoring and evaluation tools · All 120 evals comparisons
Which one, for what
DeepEval B
Good for Teams that want evaluations in pytest or a CLI on their own machines, with agent, RAG, multi-turn and MCP metrics.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 35
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
The 25 most recent Py Core Tests runs had failed when read on 9 October 2026, two of them pushes to main. Issue #3372 of 26 September reports the same
Good for Teams already on Weights & Biases, or with OpenTelemetry instrumentation, who want traces, evaluations, scorers, datasets and prompts in one place.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 68 against 59
- Security & auth, 63 against 47
- Transparency & trust, 75 against 63
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
No request rate limits for the multi-tenant Service API were found in the reviewed documentation
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | DeepEval | W&B Weave | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 59 | 68 | W&B Weave +9 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 78 | 74 | DeepEval +4 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 72 | 71 | DeepEval +1 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 47 | 63 | W&B Weave +16 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 35 | DeepEval +25 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 83 | 87 | W&B Weave +4 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 63 | 75 | W&B Weave +12 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 64.7 · B | 66.7 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | DeepEval | W&B Weave |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | SDK + MCP | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Confident AI, Inc. | Weights & Biases (CoreWeave) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://trace.wandb.ai |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache 2.0 for the Python and TypeScript packages and the agent skills. Confident AI, the hosted platform, is a proprietary service under its own terms | Hosted service under the W&B Master Service Agreement. The Weave SDKs and trace server source on GitHub are Apache-2.0, and the W&B MCP server is MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-02 | 2026-09-25 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2026-09-30 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2026-02-24 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Popularity | 19k stars, 35k npm/wk, 736k PyPI/wk | 624k npm/wk, 219k PyPI/wk |
Verdicts
DeepEval
DeepEval runs evaluations and tracing locally under Apache 2.0 with no account, and writes each test run to JSON or SQLite. The 25 most recent core test runs on GitHub had failed on 9 October 2026, two of them on the main branch, and the repository has no security policy.
W&B Weave
The Service API at trace.wandb.ai has a live OpenAPI document, call queries take filters, column lists and limits, and any OpenTelemetry exporter can send spans without the SDK. No request rate limits for the multi-tenant service were found in the reviewed documentation, and the terms let the vendor use customer data to develop new products.
Before you call either
DeepEval
- Set
DEEPEVAL_TELEMETRY_OPT_OUT=1before the first run if usage events and the public IP address should not go to PostHog - Set a judge model key such as
OPENAI_API_KEY, or use the non-LLM metrics. Most metrics call an LLM judge and bill the owner's provider account - Review thresholds for
BiasMetric,HallucinationMetric,MisuseMetricandToxicityMetricwhen upgrading past 4.2.0. Higher scores now mean better - Read results from
.deepeval/.latest_run_full.jsonor aresults_folder.deepeval inspectopens a terminal interface meant for a person - Pass an existing key with
deepeval login --api-keyin CI. Plaindeepeval loginopens a browser, and results then upload to Confident AI
W&B Weave
- Send
Authorization: Bearer <Forge API key>tohttps://trace.wandb.ai. Create the key at forge.coreweave.com/settings. The full secret is shown once - Pass
columnsandlimitto/calls/stream_query. Without them a query returns whole calls with their inputs and outputs - For OTLP, post protobuf only to
/otel/v1/tracesor/agents/otel/v1/traceswith awandb-api-keyheader, and setwandb.entityandwandb.projectas resource attributes. Spans with neither are dropped - Check
call.exceptionafter.call()in the Python SDK. Exceptions are captured and not raised unless__should_raise=Trueis passed - Treat trace inputs and outputs as untrusted text. Traces hold whatever the traced application logged
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, DeepEval or W&B Weave?
W&B Weave scores 66.7 (B) on agent readiness against DeepEval's 64.7 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. DeepEval leads on payments & pricing.
Can an agent call DeepEval and W&B Weave without installing anything?
No hosted endpoint is listed for DeepEval. W&B Weave has a hosted endpoint at https://trace.wandb.ai.
Are DeepEval and W&B Weave open source?
Yes. DeepEval is open source (Apache 2.0 for the Python and TypeScript packages and the agent skills. Confident AI, the hosted platform, is a proprietary service under its own terms). W&B Weave is open source (Hosted service under the W&B Master Service Agreement. The Weave SDKs and trace server source on GitHub are Apache-2.0, and the W&B MCP server is MIT).
Other comparisons with DeepEval or W&B Weave
- Arize Phoenix vs DeepEval
- Arize Phoenix vs W&B Weave
- Baserun vs DeepEval
- Baserun vs W&B Weave
- Braintrust API + MCP vs DeepEval
- Braintrust API + MCP vs W&B Weave
- Galileo API + MCP vs W&B Weave
- Helicone AI Gateway + MCP vs W&B Weave
- HoneyHive vs W&B Weave
- Laminar API + MCP vs W&B Weave
- Langfuse API + MCP vs W&B Weave
- LangSmith API + MCP vs W&B Weave
- LangWatch vs W&B Weave
- MLflow Tracing vs W&B Weave
- Prefactor vs W&B Weave
- Pydantic Logfire vs W&B Weave
- Respan API + MCP vs W&B Weave
- DeepEval vs Galileo API + MCP
- DeepEval vs Helicone AI Gateway + MCP
- DeepEval vs HoneyHive
- DeepEval vs Laminar API + MCP
- DeepEval vs Langfuse API + MCP
- DeepEval vs LangSmith API + MCP
- DeepEval vs LangWatch
- DeepEval vs MLflow Tracing
- DeepEval vs Prefactor
- DeepEval vs Pydantic Logfire
- DeepEval vs Respan API + MCP
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/deepeval-vs-wandb-weave.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/deepeval.json·/api/v1/tools/wandb-weave.json - From a terminal
anchor compare deepeval wandb-weave(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "deepeval", "b": "wandb-weave"}at/mcp, no key