Head to head · Evaluations · October 2026 research run
DeepEval vs HoneyHive
DeepEval scores 64.7 (B) on agent readiness against HoneyHive's 55.7 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. HoneyHive leads on schema & documentation and security & auth. Both do evaluations.
Best agent tracing, monitoring and evaluation tools · All 120 evals comparisons
Which one, for what
DeepEval B
Good for Teams that want evaluations in pytest or a CLI on their own machines, with agent, RAG, multi-turn and MCP metrics.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 59 against 44
- Agent ergonomics, 72 against 63
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 20
- Maintenance & community, 83 against 77
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
- Open source
- No incidents deducted, where HoneyHive loses 3 points for them
Watch for
The 25 most recent Py Core Tests runs had failed when read on 9 October 2026, two of them pushes to main. Issue #3372 of 26 September reports the same
Good for Teams that want OpenTelemetry tracing and evals with tight key scoping, drive the platform from a CLI and can talk to sales for volume.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 86 against 78
- Security & auth, 61 against 47
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
Status page showed 80.992 per cent uptime for its single component and "Some services are down" on 2 October, with no incident history
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | DeepEval | HoneyHive | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 59 | 44 | DeepEval +15 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 78 | 86 | HoneyHive +8 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 72 | 63 | DeepEval +9 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 47 | 61 | HoneyHive +14 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 20 | DeepEval +40 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 83 | 77 | DeepEval +6 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 63 | 66 | HoneyHive +3 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -3 | |
| Total | 64.7 · B | 55.7 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | DeepEval | HoneyHive |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | SDK + MCP | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Confident AI, Inc. | HoneyHive |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.dp1.us.honeyhive.ai |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache 2.0 for the Python and TypeScript packages and the agent skills. Confident AI, the hosted platform, is a proprietary service under its own terms | MIT (SDK, CLI and OpenAPI specs only, platform closed source) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-02 | 2026-09-29 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2025-01-06 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2025-01-11 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Popularity | 19k stars, 35k npm/wk, 736k PyPI/wk | 60 npm/wk, 2.1k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
DeepEval
DeepEval runs evaluations and tracing locally under Apache 2.0 with no account, and writes each test run to JSON or SQLite. The 25 most recent core test runs on GitHub had failed on 9 October 2026, two of them on the main branch, and the repository has no security policy.
HoneyHive
Read-only (hh_ro_), ingestion-only (hh_ingst_) and expiring fine-grained (hh_fgcp_) API keys. Status page showed 80.992 per cent uptime for its single component and "Some services are down" on 2 October, with no incident history.
Before you call either
DeepEval
- Set
DEEPEVAL_TELEMETRY_OPT_OUT=1before the first run if usage events and the public IP address should not go to PostHog - Set a judge model key such as
OPENAI_API_KEY, or use the non-LLM metrics. Most metrics call an LLM judge and bill the owner's provider account - Review thresholds for
BiasMetric,HallucinationMetric,MisuseMetricandToxicityMetricwhen upgrading past 4.2.0. Higher scores now mean better - Read results from
.deepeval/.latest_run_full.jsonor aresults_folder.deepeval inspectopens a terminal interface meant for a person - Pass an existing key with
deepeval login --api-keyin CI. Plaindeepeval loginopens a browser, and results then upload to Confident AI
HoneyHive
- Give the agent a read-only
hh_ro_key for analysis and a separatehh_ingst_key for sending traces - Treat a 404 as possibly a bad, revoked or expired key before assuming the record is missing
- Set
limitonPOST /v1/events/search. The default is 1,000 rows - Use the CLI (
brew tap honeyhiveai/tap && brew install honeyhive) from a coding agent. It maps one command to each API endpoint - Control plane commands need an
hh_fgcp_key and the control plane host api.cp.us.honeyhive.ai
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, DeepEval or HoneyHive?
DeepEval scores 64.7 (B) on agent readiness against HoneyHive's 55.7 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. HoneyHive leads on schema & documentation and security & auth.
Can an agent call DeepEval and HoneyHive without installing anything?
No hosted endpoint is listed for DeepEval. HoneyHive has a hosted endpoint at https://api.dp1.us.honeyhive.ai.
Are DeepEval and HoneyHive open source?
DeepEval is open source (Apache 2.0 for the Python and TypeScript packages and the agent skills. Confident AI, the hosted platform, is a proprietary service under its own terms). No open-source release is listed for HoneyHive.
Other comparisons with DeepEval or HoneyHive
- Arize Phoenix vs DeepEval
- Arize Phoenix vs HoneyHive
- Baserun vs DeepEval
- Baserun vs HoneyHive
- Braintrust API + MCP vs DeepEval
- Braintrust API + MCP vs HoneyHive
- Galileo API + MCP vs HoneyHive
- Helicone AI Gateway + MCP vs HoneyHive
- HoneyHive vs Laminar API + MCP
- HoneyHive vs Langfuse API + MCP
- HoneyHive vs LangSmith API + MCP
- HoneyHive vs LangWatch
- HoneyHive vs MLflow Tracing
- HoneyHive vs Prefactor
- HoneyHive vs Pydantic Logfire
- HoneyHive vs Respan API + MCP
- HoneyHive vs W&B Weave
- DeepEval vs Galileo API + MCP
- DeepEval vs Helicone AI Gateway + MCP
- DeepEval vs Laminar API + MCP
- DeepEval vs Langfuse API + MCP
- DeepEval vs LangSmith API + MCP
- DeepEval vs LangWatch
- DeepEval vs MLflow Tracing
- DeepEval vs Prefactor
- DeepEval vs Pydantic Logfire
- DeepEval vs Respan API + MCP
- DeepEval vs W&B Weave
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/deepeval-vs-honeyhive.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/deepeval.json·/api/v1/tools/honeyhive.json - From a terminal
anchor compare deepeval honeyhive(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "deepeval", "b": "honeyhive"}at/mcp, no key