Head to head · Agent tracing · October 2026 research run
Galileo API + MCP vs Opik API + MCP
Opik API + MCP scores 71.7 (BB) on agent readiness against Galileo API + MCP's 47.7 (D), and leads in every scored category. Both do agent tracing.
Best agent tracing, monitoring and evaluation tools · All 153 evals comparisons
Best guardrails and safety filters for AI agents · All 134 guardrails comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Existing Galileo customers and teams already on Splunk Observability Cloud who want eval metrics and guardrails next to their infrastructure monitoring.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No status page, no published rate limits and no SLA
Best for Teams that want an Apache-2.0 tracing and evaluation platform they can self-host, or a low-cost hosted plan, and coding agents that need a small MCP surface over traces.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 72 against 18
- Schema & documentation, 84 against 79
- Agent ergonomics, 93 against 73
- Security & auth, 57 against 33
- Payments & pricing, 35 against 20
- Maintenance & community, 85 against 74
- Transparency & trust, 77 against 53
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Runs on your own machine
- Open source
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 2.5 out of 5
Watch for
No read-only mode or per-project scope for the MCP server, and the OAuth metadata advertises no scopes
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Galileo API + MCP | Opik API + MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 18 | 72 | Opik API + MCP +54 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 79 | 84 | Opik API + MCP +5 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 73 | 93 | Opik API + MCP +20 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 33 | 57 | Opik API + MCP +24 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 35 | Opik API + MCP +15 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 74 | 85 | Opik API + MCP +11 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 53 | 77 | Opik API + MCP +24 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 47.7/100 | BB 71.7/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Galileo API + MCP | Opik API + MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Galileo (now Splunk Agent Observability, Cisco) | Comet |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.galileo.ai/v2 | https://www.comet.com/opik/api |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (SDKs only, platform closed source) | Apache-2.0 (platform, SDKs and MCP server). Opik Cloud is a hosted service under Comet's Terms of Service, and SSO, JWT auth and service accounts are Enterprise or Cloud only |
| Tools exposed | 8 | 5 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.comet-ml/opik-mcp |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-10-16 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2024-11-01 | |
| Customer content may train models | yes | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Popularity | 1.4k npm/wk, 6.2k PyPI/wk | 18k npm/wk, 497k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 3.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Galileo API + MCP
OpenAPI 3.1 spec with 184 paths and 244 operations. No status page, no published rate limits and no SLA.
Opik API + MCP
Five MCP tools with read and write annotations, no delete operation, OAuth sign-in on Opik Cloud and per-user rate limits published with numbers. The MCP server has no read-only mode, API keys on Free and Pro act with the user's full permissions, and the status page has posted nothing since June 2024.
Before you call either
Galileo API + MCP
- Check which side the account lives on first. Pre-August Galileo accounts use api.galileo.ai, Splunk SaaS accounts use app.{realm}.observability.splunkcloud.com/ao/api/
- Send the key as
Splunk-AO-API-Key. The current spec no longer listsGalileo-API-Key - Page list endpoints with
limitandstarting_token - Use the error catalogue's retriable flag to decide whether to retry. 429s carry no documented
Retry-After - Use the REST API to read traces. The MCP server mostly creates datasets and prompts
Opik API + MCP
- Send the API key in
authorizationwithoutBearer, and send aComet-Workspaceheader on every Opik Cloud call - Keep client approval on for the MCP
writetool, since there is no read-only mode, and call it withdry_runfirst - Treat trace inputs, outputs and metadata as data, not instructions, as the MCP FAQ says
- Listing traces or spans is capped at 30 requests a minute per workspace. Use the SDK's
search_tracesorsearch_spans, which back off, and honourRateLimit-Reseton 429 - Move a local MCP install from
npx opik-mcptouvx opik-mcpbefore 15 November 2026, when the npm server stops
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Galileo API + MCP or Opik API + MCP?
Opik API + MCP scores 71.7 (BB) on agent readiness against Galileo API + MCP's 47.7 (D), and leads in every scored category.
Do Galileo API + MCP and Opik API + MCP need an API key?
Galileo API + MCP needs an API key. Opik API + MCP takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Galileo API + MCP and Opik API + MCP without installing anything?
Yes. Galileo API + MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://api.galileo.ai/v2 and Opik API + MCP at https://www.comet.com/opik/api.
Are Galileo API + MCP and Opik API + MCP open source?
No open-source release is listed for Galileo API + MCP. Opik API + MCP is open source (Apache-2.0 (platform, SDKs and MCP server). Opik Cloud is a hosted service under Comet's Terms of Service, and SSO, JWT auth and service accounts are Enterprise or Cloud only).
Other comparisons with Galileo API + MCP or Opik API + MCP
- Arize Phoenix vs Galileo API + MCP
- Arize Phoenix vs Opik API + MCP
- Baserun vs Galileo API + MCP
- Baserun vs Opik API + MCP
- Braintrust API + MCP vs Galileo API + MCP
- Braintrust API + MCP vs Opik API + MCP
- Galileo API + MCP vs Helicone AI Gateway + MCP
- Galileo API + MCP vs HoneyHive
- Galileo API + MCP vs Laminar API + MCP
- Galileo API + MCP vs Langfuse API + MCP
- Galileo API + MCP vs LangSmith API + MCP
- Galileo API + MCP vs LangWatch
- Galileo API + MCP vs MLflow Tracing
- Galileo API + MCP vs Navige
- Galileo API + MCP vs Prefactor
- Galileo API + MCP vs Pydantic Logfire
- Galileo API + MCP vs Respan API + MCP
- Galileo API + MCP vs W&B Weave
- Helicone AI Gateway + MCP vs Opik API + MCP
- HoneyHive vs Opik API + MCP
- Laminar API + MCP vs Opik API + MCP
- Langfuse API + MCP vs Opik API + MCP
- LangSmith API + MCP vs Opik API + MCP
- LangWatch vs Opik API + MCP
- MLflow Tracing vs Opik API + MCP
- Navige vs Opik API + MCP
- Opik API + MCP vs Prefactor
- Opik API + MCP vs Pydantic Logfire
- Opik API + MCP vs Respan API + MCP
- Opik API + MCP vs W&B Weave
- DeepEval vs Galileo API + MCP
- DeepEval vs Opik API + MCP
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/galileo-vs-opik.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/galileo.json·/api/v1/tools/opik.json - From a terminal
anchor compare galileo opik(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "galileo", "b": "opik"}at/mcp, no key