Head to head · Agent tracing · October 2026 research run
Baserun vs Opik API + MCP
Baserun shut down on 2024-09-30. Opik API + MCP scores 71.7 (BB) on agent readiness against Baserun's 7 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do agent tracing.
Best agent tracing, monitoring and evaluation tools · All 153 evals comparisons
Which one, for what
Baserun F
Best for Nothing new. It shut down on 2024-09-30.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Service offline since late 2024. api.baserun.ai doesn't resolve and app.baserun.ai serves an expired certificate
Best for Teams that want an Apache-2.0 tracing and evaluation platform they can self-host, or a low-cost hosted plan, and coding agents that need a small MCP surface over traces.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 72 against 0
- Schema & documentation, 84 against 15
- Agent ergonomics, 93 against 5
- Security & auth, 57 against 5
- Payments & pricing, 35 against 0
- Maintenance & community, 85 against 0
- Transparency & trust, 77 against 33
Also in its favour
- Still running. Baserun has shut down
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Runs on your own machine
- Open source
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 1.0 out of 5
Watch for
No read-only mode or per-project scope for the MCP server, and the OAuth metadata advertises no scopes
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Baserun | Opik API + MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 0 | 72 | Opik API + MCP +72 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 15 | 84 | Opik API + MCP +69 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 5 | 93 | Opik API + MCP +88 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 5 | 57 | Opik API + MCP +52 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 0 | 35 | Opik API + MCP +35 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 0 | 85 | Opik API + MCP +85 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 33 | 77 | Opik API + MCP +44 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | F 7/100 | BB 71.7/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Baserun | Opik API + MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Baserun | Comet |
| Hosted endpoint | https://app.baserun.ai | https://www.comet.com/opik/api |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | Apache-2.0 (platform, SDKs and MCP server). Opik Cloud is a hosted service under Comet's Terms of Service, and SSO, JWT auth and service accounts are Enterprise or Cloud only |
| Tools exposed | none | 5 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.comet-ml/opik-mcp |
| Last release | 2024-06-26 | 2026-10-16 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | |
| Popularity | 115 npm/wk, 209 PyPI/wk | 18k npm/wk, 497k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 1/5 (2) | 3.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Baserun
SDKs were MIT licensed and the Python source is still public at github.com/baserun-ai/baserun-py. Service offline since late 2024. api.baserun.ai doesn't resolve and app.baserun.ai serves an expired certificate.
Opik API + MCP
Five MCP tools with read and write annotations, no delete operation, OAuth sign-in on Opik Cloud and per-user rate limits published with numbers. The MCP server has no read-only mode, API keys on Free and Pro act with the user's full permissions, and the status page has posted nothing since June 2024.
Before you call either
Baserun
- Don't install
baserunfrom PyPI or npm. Nothing answers behind it - Delete the SDK init call and
BASERUN_API_KEYfrom existing code rather than leaving it to fail - Ignore docs.baserun.ai. It describes a service that no longer runs and doesn't say so
Opik API + MCP
- Send the API key in
authorizationwithoutBearer, and send aComet-Workspaceheader on every Opik Cloud call - Keep client approval on for the MCP
writetool, since there is no read-only mode, and call it withdry_runfirst - Treat trace inputs, outputs and metadata as data, not instructions, as the MCP FAQ says
- Listing traces or spans is capped at 30 requests a minute per workspace. Use the SDK's
search_tracesorsearch_spans, which back off, and honourRateLimit-Reseton 429 - Move a local MCP install from
npx opik-mcptouvx opik-mcpbefore 15 November 2026, when the npm server stops
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Baserun or Opik API + MCP?
Opik API + MCP scores 71.7 (BB) on agent readiness against Baserun's 7 (F), and leads in every scored category.
Do Baserun and Opik API + MCP need an API key?
Baserun needs an API key. Opik API + MCP takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Baserun and Opik API + MCP without installing anything?
Yes. Baserun has a hosted endpoint at https://app.baserun.ai and Opik API + MCP at https://www.comet.com/opik/api.
Are Baserun and Opik API + MCP open source?
No open-source release is listed for Baserun. Opik API + MCP is open source (Apache-2.0 (platform, SDKs and MCP server). Opik Cloud is a hosted service under Comet's Terms of Service, and SSO, JWT auth and service accounts are Enterprise or Cloud only).
Other comparisons with Baserun or Opik API + MCP
- Arize Phoenix vs Baserun
- Arize Phoenix vs Opik API + MCP
- Baserun vs Braintrust API + MCP
- Baserun vs DeepEval
- Baserun vs Galileo API + MCP
- Baserun vs Helicone AI Gateway + MCP
- Baserun vs HoneyHive
- Baserun vs Laminar API + MCP
- Baserun vs Langfuse API + MCP
- Baserun vs LangSmith API + MCP
- Baserun vs LangWatch
- Baserun vs MLflow Tracing
- Baserun vs Navige
- Baserun vs Prefactor
- Baserun vs Pydantic Logfire
- Baserun vs Respan API + MCP
- Baserun vs W&B Weave
- Braintrust API + MCP vs Opik API + MCP
- Galileo API + MCP vs Opik API + MCP
- Helicone AI Gateway + MCP vs Opik API + MCP
- HoneyHive vs Opik API + MCP
- Laminar API + MCP vs Opik API + MCP
- Langfuse API + MCP vs Opik API + MCP
- LangSmith API + MCP vs Opik API + MCP
- LangWatch vs Opik API + MCP
- MLflow Tracing vs Opik API + MCP
- Navige vs Opik API + MCP
- Opik API + MCP vs Prefactor
- Opik API + MCP vs Pydantic Logfire
- Opik API + MCP vs Respan API + MCP
- Opik API + MCP vs W&B Weave
- DeepEval vs Opik API + MCP
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/baserun-vs-opik.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/baserun.json·/api/v1/tools/opik.json - From a terminal
anchor compare baserun opik(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "baserun", "b": "opik"}at/mcp, no key