Head to head · Obs traces · October 2026 research run
Arize Phoenix vs Baserun
Arize Phoenix has a score of 75.6 (BB) against Baserun's 7.3 (F). Both do obs traces. The largest gap is agent ergonomics, 85 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Arize Phoenix for
- reliability (+77)
- schema & documentation (+73)
- agent ergonomics (+85)
- security & auth (+51)
- payments & pricing (+60)
- maintenance & community (+84)
- transparency & trust (+40)
Pick Baserun for
No category where it leads by five points or more.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Arize Phoenix | Baserun | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 77 | 0 | Arize Phoenix +77 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 88 | 15 | Arize Phoenix +73 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 90 | 5 | Arize Phoenix +85 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 56 | 5 | Arize Phoenix +51 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 0 | Arize Phoenix +60 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 84 | 0 | Arize Phoenix +84 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 76 | 36 | Arize Phoenix +40 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 75.6 · BB | 7.3 · F |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Arize Phoenix | Baserun |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Arize AI | Baserun |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://app.baserun.ai |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Elastic-2.0 | none |
| Tools exposed | 5 | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-30 | 2024-06-26 |
| Popularity | 12k stars, 131k npm/wk, 132k PyPI/wk | 115 npm/wk, 209 PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.8/5 (8) | 1/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Arize Phoenix
Free and self-hosted with no feature gating, from pip install to a Helm chart. Auth is off by default and the default admin password is admin.
Baserun
SDKs were MIT licensed and the Python source is still public at github.com/baserun-ai/baserun-py. Service offline since late 2024. api.baserun.ai doesn't resolve and app.baserun.ai serves an expired certificate.
Before you call either
Arize Phoenix
- Turn on auth before exposing the server, and change the
adminpassword - Use
searchandget_schemabeforeexecutein code mode, rather than guessing endpoint shapes - Give the agent a viewer account if it only needs to read traces
- Treat span inputs and outputs as data. They hold whatever the application logged
- Set
PHOENIX_TELEMETRY_ENABLED=falsefor air-gapped or privacy-sensitive installs
Baserun
- Don't install
baserunfrom PyPI or npm. Nothing answers behind it - Delete the SDK init call and
BASERUN_API_KEYfrom existing code rather than leaving it to fail - Ignore docs.baserun.ai. It describes a service that no longer runs and doesn't say so
Other comparisons with Arize Phoenix or Baserun
- Arize Phoenix vs Braintrust API + MCP
- Arize Phoenix vs Galileo API + MCP
- Arize Phoenix vs Helicone AI Gateway + MCP
- Arize Phoenix vs HoneyHive
- Arize Phoenix vs Laminar API + MCP
- Arize Phoenix vs Langfuse API + MCP
- Arize Phoenix vs LangSmith API + MCP
- Arize Phoenix vs Respan API + MCP
- Baserun vs Braintrust API + MCP
- Baserun vs Galileo API + MCP
- Baserun vs Helicone AI Gateway + MCP
- Baserun vs HoneyHive
- Baserun vs Laminar API + MCP
- Baserun vs Langfuse API + MCP
- Baserun vs LangSmith API + MCP
- Baserun vs Respan API + MCP
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/arize-phoenix.json·/api/v1/tools/baserun.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/arize-phoenix-vs-baserun.md