Head to head · Issues and tasks · October 2026 research run
Linear MCP vs Teamwork.com
Teamwork.com scores 65.9 (B) on agent readiness against Linear MCP's 53.8 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Linear MCP leads on security & auth. Both do issues and tasks.
Best issue tracking, docs and chat tools for AI agents · All 40 work comparisons
Best project and task management tools for AI agents · All 135 projects comparisons
Which one, for what
Good for Teams on Linear who want an agent to triage, file and update issues under the user's permissions, with a hard read-only option.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 71 against 58
Watch for
No published tool list, schemas or MCP error responses
Good for Agencies and services firms already on Teamwork.com that want an assistant to create and update tasks, log time, read workload and budgets, and answer Desk tickets.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 73 against 60
- Schema & documentation, 72 against 51
- Agent ergonomics, 68 against 38
- Maintenance & community, 88 against 57
- Transparency & trust, 80 against 71
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
OAuth scopes are per product only (projects, desk, spaces, chat), and the token from the app login flow is described as permanent
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Linear MCP | Teamwork.com | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 60 | 73 | Teamwork.com +13 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 51 | 72 | Teamwork.com +21 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 38 | 68 | Teamwork.com +30 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 71 | 58 | Linear MCP +13 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 30 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 57 | 88 | Teamwork.com +31 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 71 | 80 | Teamwork.com +9 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 53.8 · D | 65.9 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Linear MCP | Teamwork.com |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | MCP server | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Linear | Teamwork Crew Limited |
| Hosted endpoint | https://mcp.linear.app/mcp | https://mcp.ai.teamwork.com |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy), stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Your plan | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | proprietary | Proprietary service under Teamwork.com's terms of service. The MCP server on GitHub is MIT |
| Tools exposed | none | 225 |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| MCP registry | app.linear/linear | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-08-13 | 2026-10-06 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-06-09 | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2025-03-17 | 2024-08-19 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | none | 26 stars |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | none |
Verdicts
Linear MCP
OAuth 2.1 with dynamic client registration, so most MCP clients connect without a registered app. No published tool list, schemas or MCP error responses.
Teamwork.com
The official MCP server is MIT licensed, released almost daily, and has typed tools with annotations, profile endpoints and no delete tools on the shipped servers. OAuth scopes stop at product level, access tokens are permanent, and no SLA, API changelog or prompt-injection guidance was found in the reviewed documentation.
Before you call either
Linear MCP
- Use
https://mcp.linear.app/mcp/readonlyfor triage and reporting, it only exposes read tools - Headless runs take
Authorization: Bearer <API key>, and a key created with Read permission can't write - Treat an HTTP 400 with RATELIMITED as a rate limit and wait for the X-RateLimit-Requests-Reset time
- Call
list_teamsfirst, since team visibility and retired teams come back in its output
Teamwork.com
- Use a profile endpoint such as https://mcp.ai.teamwork.com/project-manager. The base URL loads every tool across Projects, Desk, Spaces and Chat.
- Ask a site administrator to enable MCP under Settings, AI before connecting.
- Build REST URLs from
installation.apiEndPointin the token response. Sites live at {site}.teamwork.com (US) or {site}.eu.teamwork.com (EU). - Stay under 150 requests a minute on Free, Basics and Accelerate. The limit is shared by the whole site. On 429, wait until
X-Rate-Limit-Reset. - Pass
verbose=falsetolist_*tools to get ids and names only, and usetwprojects-create_tasksfor many tasks in one call.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Linear MCP or Teamwork.com?
Teamwork.com scores 65.9 (B) on agent readiness against Linear MCP's 53.8 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Linear MCP leads on security & auth.
Do Linear MCP and Teamwork.com need an API key?
Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Linear MCP and Teamwork.com without installing anything?
Yes. Linear MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.linear.app/mcp and Teamwork.com at https://mcp.ai.teamwork.com.
Other comparisons with Linear MCP or Teamwork.com
- Asana vs Linear MCP
- Asana vs Teamwork.com
- Atlassian Rovo MCP Server vs Teamwork.com
- Basecamp vs Linear MCP
- Basecamp vs Teamwork.com
- ClickUp vs Linear MCP
- ClickUp vs Teamwork.com
- Linear MCP vs monday.com
- Linear MCP vs OpenProject
- Linear MCP vs Plane
- Linear MCP vs Redmine
- Linear MCP vs Roma
- Linear MCP vs Shortcut
- Linear MCP vs Taiga
- Linear MCP vs Todoist
- Linear MCP vs Trello
- Linear MCP vs Wrike
- Linear MCP vs YouTrack
- monday.com vs Teamwork.com
- OpenProject vs Teamwork.com
- Plane vs Teamwork.com
- Redmine vs Teamwork.com
- Roma vs Teamwork.com
- Shortcut vs Teamwork.com
- Taiga vs Teamwork.com
- Teamwork.com vs Todoist
- Teamwork.com vs Trello
- Teamwork.com vs Wrike
- Teamwork.com vs YouTrack
- Atlassian Rovo MCP Server vs Linear MCP
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/linear-mcp-vs-teamwork.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/linear-mcp.json·/api/v1/tools/teamwork.json - From a terminal
anchor compare linear-mcp teamwork(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "linear-mcp", "b": "teamwork"}at/mcp, no key