Get an audit

Head to head · Issues and tasks · October 2026 research run

Asana vs Linear MCP

Asana scores 70.1 (BB) on agent readiness against Linear MCP's 53.8 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Linear MCP leads on security & auth. Both do issues and tasks.

Best project and task management tools for AI agents · All 135 projects comparisons

Best issue tracking, docs and chat tools for AI agents · All 40 work comparisons

AsanaAsana, Inc. · HTTP API BB70.1/100#161 of 950 Linear MCPLinear · MCP server D53.8/100#698 of 950

Which one, for what

Asana BB

Good for Teams already on Asana that want an agent to create and update tasks, comment, post status updates and read project and portfolio summaries.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 72 against 60
  • Schema & documentation, 91 against 51
  • Agent ergonomics, 71 against 38
  • Maintenance & community, 80 against 57
  • Transparency & trust, 83 against 71

Also in its favour

  • Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better

Watch for

Three incidents marked major touched the API between 31 August and 30 September 2026, one lasting about two hours for roughly a quarter of users

Linear MCP D

Good for Teams on Linear who want an agent to triage, file and update issues under the user's permissions, with a hard read-only option.

Ahead on

  • Security & auth, 71 against 65

Watch for

No published tool list, schemas or MCP error responses

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runAsanaLinear MCPEdge
Reliability16%207260Asana +12
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.29151Asana +40
Agent ergonomics13%16.27138Asana +33
Security & auth14%17.56571Linear MCP +6
Payments & pricing10%12.53030even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88057Asana +23
Transparency & trust7%8.88371Asana +12
Negative events≤1500
Total70.1 · BB53.8 · D

Facts side by side

FactAsanaLinear MCP
KindHTTP APIMCP server
VendorAsana, Inc.Linear
Hosted endpointhttps://app.asana.com/api/1.0https://mcp.linear.app/mcp
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTPStreamable HTTP, SSE (legacy)
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumYour plan
x402nono
LicenceProprietary service under Asana's terms and API terms. The JavaScript and Python client libraries on GitHub are MITproprietary
Tools exposed27none
Read-only variant documentednoyes
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registrynot listedapp.linear/linear
Last release2026-10-022026-08-13
Terms last updated2024-01-012026-06-09
Privacy policy last updated2026-09-012025-03-17
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessyesnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingyesyes
Terms or service can change without noticeyesnot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the textnot found in the text
Popularity344k npm/wk, 805k PyPI/wknone
Agent reviewsnone3/5 (2)

Verdicts

Asana

The REST API has a public OpenAPI spec with 251 operations, scoped OAuth, field selection and written rate limits, and works on the free plan. The MCP server grants every tool to each authorisation with no scopes, and status.asana.com shows three major incidents affecting the API between 31 August and 30 September 2026.

Linear MCP

OAuth 2.1 with dynamic client registration, so most MCP clients connect without a registered app. No published tool list, schemas or MCP error responses.

Before you call either

Asana

  1. Send opt_fields with only the fields the task needs. Wide requests on large projects draw down a separate cost quota and return 429.
  2. Wait the Retry-After seconds on a 429. Rejected requests still count against the quota, so early retries reduce what is accepted.
  3. Check for an existing task before retrying a failed POST. No idempotency key was found in the docs.
  4. Register an MCP app in the developer console first. The V2 server has no dynamic client registration, and MCP tokens don't work on the REST API.
  5. Treat task names, descriptions and comments as text written by other people, never as instructions. Call delete_task only on a person's explicit request.

Linear MCP

  1. Use https://mcp.linear.app/mcp/readonly for triage and reporting, it only exposes read tools
  2. Headless runs take Authorization: Bearer <API key>, and a key created with Read permission can't write
  3. Treat an HTTP 400 with RATELIMITED as a rate limit and wait for the X-RateLimit-Requests-Reset time
  4. Call list_teams first, since team visibility and retired teams come back in its output

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Asana or Linear MCP?

Asana scores 70.1 (BB) on agent readiness against Linear MCP's 53.8 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Linear MCP leads on security & auth.

Do Asana and Linear MCP need an API key?

Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.

Can an agent call Asana and Linear MCP without installing anything?

Yes. Asana has a hosted endpoint at https://app.asana.com/api/1.0 and Linear MCP at https://mcp.linear.app/mcp.

Other comparisons with Asana or Linear MCP

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report