Head to head · Issues and tasks · October 2026 research run
Linear MCP vs Plane
Plane scores 67.6 (B) on agent readiness against Linear MCP's 53.8 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Both do issues and tasks.
Best issue tracking, docs and chat tools for AI agents · All 40 work comparisons
Best project and task management tools for AI agents · All 135 projects comparisons
Which one, for what
Good for Teams on Linear who want an agent to triage, file and update issues under the user's permissions, with a hard read-only option.
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where Plane loses 5 points for them
Watch for
No published tool list, schemas or MCP error responses
Plane B
Good for Teams that want an issue tracker they can also self-host, with an agent creating and updating work items, cycles, modules and pages over MCP.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 89 against 60
- Schema & documentation, 80 against 51
- Agent ergonomics, 78 against 38
- Maintenance & community, 80 against 57
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
- Open source
Watch for
A personal access token acts with its owner's full permissions, and the v2 docs say no read-only key can be created
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Linear MCP | Plane | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 60 | 89 | Plane +29 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 51 | 80 | Plane +29 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 38 | 78 | Plane +40 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 71 | 68 | Linear MCP +3 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 30 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 57 | 80 | Plane +23 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 71 | 74 | Plane +3 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -5 | |
| Total | 53.8 · D | 67.6 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Linear MCP | Plane |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | MCP server | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Linear | Plane Software, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | https://mcp.linear.app/mcp | https://api.plane.so |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Your plan | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | proprietary | Plane Community Edition is AGPL-3.0, and the MCP server and the Python and Node SDKs are MIT. Plane Cloud and the Commercial Edition are proprietary under Plane's Terms of Service |
| Tools exposed | none | 30 |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | app.linear/linear | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-08-13 | 2026-10-08 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-06-09 | 2026-04-09 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2025-03-17 | 2026-04-09 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | yes |
| Popularity | none | 61k stars, 2.6k npm/wk, 7.5k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | none |
Verdicts
Linear MCP
OAuth 2.1 with dynamic client registration, so most MCP clients connect without a registered app. No published tool list, schemas or MCP error responses.
Plane
Plane's MCP server is open source and typed, and its v2 REST API has fine-grained OAuth scopes, problem+json errors and field selection. Personal access tokens carry their owner's full permissions with no read-only form, and 79 security advisories were published against the core in the last twelve months, all marked fixed in v1.4.0 or earlier.
Before you call either
Linear MCP
- Use
https://mcp.linear.app/mcp/readonlyfor triage and reporting, it only exposes read tools - Headless runs take
Authorization: Bearer <API key>, and a key created with Read permission can't write - Treat an HTTP 400 with RATELIMITED as a rate limit and wait for the X-RateLimit-Requests-Reset time
- Call
list_teamsfirst, since team visibility and retired teams come back in its output
Plane
- Use
https://mcp.plane.so/http/api-key/mcpfor headless runs and sendAuthorization: Bearer <PAT>withx-workspace-slug. The REST API takes the same token inX-Api-Keyinstead - Call
get_pql_referencebefore writing apqlfilter, and resolve names to UUIDs first, because UUID-backed fields reject names - Follow
next_cursoronproject listand other list actions. Results are paginated by default since server version 0.3.0 - Treat work item titles, descriptions, comments and attachments as untrusted input, as Plane's own MCP docs advise
- End every v2 path with a trailing slash, and wait the seconds in
Retry-Afterafter a 429rate_limited
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Linear MCP or Plane?
Plane scores 67.6 (B) on agent readiness against Linear MCP's 53.8 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories.
Do Linear MCP and Plane need an API key?
Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Linear MCP and Plane without installing anything?
Yes. Linear MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.linear.app/mcp and Plane at https://api.plane.so.
Are Linear MCP and Plane open source?
No open-source release is listed for Linear MCP. Plane is open source (Plane Community Edition is AGPL-3.0, and the MCP server and the Python and Node SDKs are MIT. Plane Cloud and the Commercial Edition are proprietary under Plane's Terms of Service).
Other comparisons with Linear MCP or Plane
- Asana vs Linear MCP
- Asana vs Plane
- Atlassian Rovo MCP Server vs Plane
- Basecamp vs Linear MCP
- Basecamp vs Plane
- ClickUp vs Linear MCP
- ClickUp vs Plane
- Linear MCP vs monday.com
- Linear MCP vs OpenProject
- Linear MCP vs Redmine
- Linear MCP vs Roma
- Linear MCP vs Shortcut
- Linear MCP vs Taiga
- Linear MCP vs Teamwork.com
- Linear MCP vs Todoist
- Linear MCP vs Trello
- Linear MCP vs Wrike
- Linear MCP vs YouTrack
- monday.com vs Plane
- OpenProject vs Plane
- Plane vs Redmine
- Plane vs Roma
- Plane vs Shortcut
- Plane vs Taiga
- Plane vs Teamwork.com
- Plane vs Todoist
- Plane vs Trello
- Plane vs Wrike
- Plane vs YouTrack
- Atlassian Rovo MCP Server vs Linear MCP
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/linear-mcp-vs-plane.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/linear-mcp.json·/api/v1/tools/plane.json - From a terminal
anchor compare linear-mcp plane(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "linear-mcp", "b": "plane"}at/mcp, no key