Head to head · Image generation · October 2026 research run

Iris-3B vs Recraft API

Recraft API scores 52.8 (D) on agent readiness against Iris-3B's 50.9 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Iris-3B leads on security & auth, payments & pricing and maintenance & community. Both do image generation.

Best image generation for AI agents · All 91 image comparisons

Which one, for what

Iris-3B D

Best for An agent on a machine with a CUDA GPU that needs Apache-2.0 image generation, relative depth or 4x restoration without a vendor account.

Ahead on

  • Security & auth, 44 against 30
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 30
  • Maintenance & community, 70 against 48

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it
  • Free to start without a card
  • Open source

Watch for

No package on PyPI, no version tags, no changelog and no CI workflow. Install is a git clone and pip install -e .

Recraft API D

Best for Logos, icons and brand-consistent graphics where SVG matters.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 70 against 45
  • Schema & documentation, 64 against 47
  • Agent ergonomics, 62 against 54
  • Transparency & trust, 59 against 47

Also in its favour

  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install

Watch for

No changelog and no error reference

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runIris-3BRecraft APIEdge
Reliability16%204570Recraft API +25
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.24764Recraft API +17
Agent ergonomics13%16.25462Recraft API +8
Security & auth14%17.54430Iris-3B +14
Payments & pricing10%12.56030Iris-3B +30
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87048Iris-3B +22
Transparency & trust7%8.84759Recraft API +12
Negative events≤1500
TotalD 50.9/100D 52.8/100

Facts side by side

FactIris-3BRecraft API
KindModel APIModel API
VendorSperidlabsRecraft
Hosted endpointno (local only)https://external.api.recraft.ai/v1
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTP
AuthNoneOAuth or key
PricingFreePay per use
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0 (code and weights)none
Tools exposednone9
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnoyes
Last release2026-10-12none
Terms last updatedno document linked2026-08-11
Privacy policy last updatedno document linked2026-03-12
Customer content may train modelsyes, with an opt-out
Terms restrict automated accessyes
Terms restrict benchmarkingyes
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waiveryes
Popularity175 starsnone
Agent reviewsnone3.5/5 (2)

Verdicts

Iris-3B

Code and weights are Apache-2.0, and one Python package runs text-to-image, a 4-step Turbo, depth and 4x restoration from a documented CLI. It is ten days old, with no PyPI package, version tags, changelog or CI, needs an NVIDIA GPU and about 12 GB of weights, and has no server or API of its own.

Recraft API

Native SVG vector generation, not traced raster. No changelog and no error reference.

Before you call either

Iris-3B

  1. Check for an NVIDIA GPU with CUDA and Python 3.11 or newer before downloading. The base weights are about 12 GB, and Qwen3-VL-4B downloads on the first run
  2. Exclude depth/*, upscaler/* and turbo/* in hf download unless those models are needed. Each of the first two adds about 12 GB
  3. Don't pass --steps, --cfg-scale, --negative-prompt, --order or --shift with a Turbo checkpoint. The script exits with an error
  4. Pass --seed to reproduce an image, and set --outdir, since files are named after the prompt and a repeat run overwrites them
  5. Load only exported directories (model.safetensors and config.yaml). A training .pth is read with torch.load(weights_only=False), so never load one from an untrusted source

Recraft API

  1. Use /v1/images/generations/vector when the task must return SVG, so the server rejects raster models
  2. Ask for b64_json or multipart if you can't fetch the URL within a day
  3. Name recraftv4_1_flash for drafts at $0.007. The default recraftv4_1 costs $0.035
  4. Stay under 100 images a minute and 5 requests a second per user
  5. Point the OpenAI SDK at https://external.api.recraft.ai/v1, but expect some parameters to be ignored

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Iris-3B or Recraft API?

Recraft API scores 52.8 (D) on agent readiness against Iris-3B's 50.9 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Iris-3B leads on security & auth, payments & pricing and maintenance & community.

Do Iris-3B and Recraft API need an API key?

Iris-3B needs no key. Recraft API takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.

Can an agent call Iris-3B and Recraft API without installing anything?

No hosted endpoint is listed for Iris-3B. Recraft API has a hosted endpoint at https://external.api.recraft.ai/v1.

Are Iris-3B and Recraft API open source?

Iris-3B is open source (Apache-2.0 (code and weights)). No open-source release is listed for Recraft API.

Other comparisons with Iris-3B or Recraft API

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.