Head to head · Image generation · October 2026 research run
Iris-3B vs Recraft API
Recraft API scores 52.8 (D) on agent readiness against Iris-3B's 50.9 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Iris-3B leads on security & auth, payments & pricing and maintenance & community. Both do image generation.
Best image generation for AI agents · All 91 image comparisons
Which one, for what
Iris-3B D
Best for An agent on a machine with a CUDA GPU that needs Apache-2.0 image generation, relative depth or 4x restoration without a vendor account.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 44 against 30
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 30
- Maintenance & community, 70 against 48
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Free to start without a card
- Open source
Watch for
No package on PyPI, no version tags, no changelog and no CI workflow. Install is a git clone and pip install -e .
Best for Logos, icons and brand-consistent graphics where SVG matters.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 70 against 45
- Schema & documentation, 64 against 47
- Agent ergonomics, 62 against 54
- Transparency & trust, 59 against 47
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
No changelog and no error reference
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Iris-3B | Recraft API | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 45 | 70 | Recraft API +25 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 47 | 64 | Recraft API +17 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 54 | 62 | Recraft API +8 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 44 | 30 | Iris-3B +14 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 30 | Iris-3B +30 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 70 | 48 | Iris-3B +22 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 47 | 59 | Recraft API +12 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 50.9/100 | D 52.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Iris-3B | Recraft API |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model API | Model API |
| Vendor | Speridlabs | Recraft |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://external.api.recraft.ai/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | |
| Auth | None | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Free | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (code and weights) | none |
| Tools exposed | none | 9 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-12 | none |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2026-08-11 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2026-03-12 |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Popularity | 175 stars | none |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Iris-3B
Code and weights are Apache-2.0, and one Python package runs text-to-image, a 4-step Turbo, depth and 4x restoration from a documented CLI. It is ten days old, with no PyPI package, version tags, changelog or CI, needs an NVIDIA GPU and about 12 GB of weights, and has no server or API of its own.
Recraft API
Native SVG vector generation, not traced raster. No changelog and no error reference.
Before you call either
Iris-3B
- Check for an NVIDIA GPU with CUDA and Python 3.11 or newer before downloading. The base weights are about 12 GB, and Qwen3-VL-4B downloads on the first run
- Exclude
depth/*,upscaler/*andturbo/*inhf downloadunless those models are needed. Each of the first two adds about 12 GB - Don't pass
--steps,--cfg-scale,--negative-prompt,--orderor--shiftwith a Turbo checkpoint. The script exits with an error - Pass
--seedto reproduce an image, and set--outdir, since files are named after the prompt and a repeat run overwrites them - Load only exported directories (
model.safetensorsandconfig.yaml). A training.pthis read withtorch.load(weights_only=False), so never load one from an untrusted source
Recraft API
- Use
/v1/images/generations/vectorwhen the task must return SVG, so the server rejects raster models - Ask for
b64_jsonormultipartif you can't fetch the URL within a day - Name
recraftv4_1_flashfor drafts at $0.007. The defaultrecraftv4_1costs $0.035 - Stay under 100 images a minute and 5 requests a second per user
- Point the OpenAI SDK at
https://external.api.recraft.ai/v1, but expect some parameters to be ignored
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Iris-3B or Recraft API?
Recraft API scores 52.8 (D) on agent readiness against Iris-3B's 50.9 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Iris-3B leads on security & auth, payments & pricing and maintenance & community.
Do Iris-3B and Recraft API need an API key?
Iris-3B needs no key. Recraft API takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Iris-3B and Recraft API without installing anything?
No hosted endpoint is listed for Iris-3B. Recraft API has a hosted endpoint at https://external.api.recraft.ai/v1.
Are Iris-3B and Recraft API open source?
Iris-3B is open source (Apache-2.0 (code and weights)). No open-source release is listed for Recraft API.
Other comparisons with Iris-3B or Recraft API
- Adobe Firefly API vs Iris-3B
- Adobe Firefly API vs Recraft API
- Black Forest Labs FLUX API vs Iris-3B
- Black Forest Labs FLUX API vs Recraft API
- Bria API vs Iris-3B
- Bria API vs Recraft API
- fal image models vs Iris-3B
- fal image models vs Recraft API
- Google Imagen vs Iris-3B
- Google Imagen vs Recraft API
- Ideogram API vs Iris-3B
- Ideogram API vs Recraft API
- Iris-3B vs Leonardo.Ai API
- Iris-3B vs OpenAI Image API
- Iris-3B vs Qwen-Image 2.1 (Model Studio)
- Iris-3B vs Replicate image models
- Iris-3B vs Seedream on BytePlus ModelArk
- Iris-3B vs Stability AI Image API
- Leonardo.Ai API vs Recraft API
- OpenAI Image API vs Recraft API
- Qwen-Image 2.1 (Model Studio) vs Recraft API
- Recraft API vs Replicate image models
- Recraft API vs Seedream on BytePlus ModelArk
- Recraft API vs Stability AI Image API
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/iris-3b-vs-recraft.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/iris-3b.json·/api/v1/tools/recraft.json - From a terminal
anchor compare iris-3b recraft(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "iris-3b", "b": "recraft"}at/mcp, no key