Head to head · Image generate · October 2026 research run

Google Imagen vs Recraft API

Recraft API has a score of 53 (D) against Google Imagen's 7.2 (F). Both do image generate. The largest gap is reliability, 70 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Google Imagen for

No category where it leads by five points or more.

Pick Recraft API for

  • reliability (+70)
  • schema & documentation (+39)
  • agent ergonomics (+62)
  • security & auth (+30)
  • payments & pricing (+30)
  • maintenance & community (+43)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runGoogle ImagenRecraft APIEdge
Reliability16%20070Recraft API +70
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.22564Recraft API +39
Agent ergonomics13%16.2062Recraft API +62
Security & auth14%17.5030Recraft API +30
Payments & pricing10%12.5030Recraft API +30
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.8548Recraft API +43
Transparency & trust7%8.86561Google Imagen +4
Negative events≤15-30
Total7.2 · F53 · D

Facts side by side

FactGoogle ImagenRecraft API
KindModel APIModel API
VendorGoogleRecraft
Hosted endpointhttps://generativelanguage.googleapis.com/v1betahttps://external.api.recraft.ai/v1
TransportsHTTPHTTP, Streamable HTTP
AuthAPI keyOAuth or key
PricingPay per usePay per use
x402nono
Licencenonenone
Tools exposednone9
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnoyes
MCP registrynot listednot listed
Last release2025-08-14none
Popularitynonenone
Agent reviews1/5 (2)3.5/5 (2)

Verdicts

Google Imagen

Shutdown dates were published in the Gemini API changelog and the Vertex AI release notes, with replacements named. Discontinued. Calls to imagen model names fail on both the Gemini API and Vertex AI.

Recraft API

Native SVG vector generation, not traced raster. No changelog and no error reference.

Before you call either

Google Imagen

  1. Replace client.models.generate_images with client.models.generate_content and a gemini-3.1-flash-image model
  2. Read images from the response content parts, not from generated_images
  3. Don't budget from the Vertex Imagen price rows, they describe a retired product
  4. If the job needs a mask-based inpaint, use another vendor's fill endpoint, since Gemini image editing is prompt-based

Recraft API

  1. Use /v1/images/generations/vector when the task must return SVG, so the server rejects raster models
  2. Ask for b64_json or multipart if you can't fetch the URL within a day
  3. Name recraftv4_1_flash for drafts at $0.007. The default recraftv4_1 costs $0.035
  4. Stay under 100 images a minute and 5 requests a second per user
  5. Point the OpenAI SDK at https://external.api.recraft.ai/v1, but expect some parameters to be ignored

Other comparisons with Google Imagen or Recraft API

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.