Head to head · Image generate · October 2026 research run
Leonardo.Ai API vs Recraft API
Recraft API has a score of 53 (D) against Leonardo.Ai API's 37.8 (F). Both do image generate. The largest gap is reliability, 40 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Leonardo.Ai API for
- security & auth (+10)
Pick Recraft API for
- reliability (+40)
- schema & documentation (+19)
- agent ergonomics (+8)
- payments & pricing (+30)
- transparency & trust (+10)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Leonardo.Ai API | Recraft API | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 30 | 70 | Recraft API +40 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 45 | 64 | Recraft API +19 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 54 | 62 | Recraft API +8 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 40 | 30 | Leonardo.Ai API +10 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 0 | 30 | Recraft API +30 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 48 | 48 | even |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 51 | 61 | Recraft API +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 37.8 · F | 53 · D |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Leonardo.Ai API | Recraft API |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model API | Model API |
| Vendor | Leonardo.Ai (Canva) | Recraft |
| Hosted endpoint | https://cloud.leonardo.ai/api/rest/v2 | https://external.api.recraft.ai/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | none |
| Tools exposed | none | 9 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-04-21 | none |
| Popularity | 20k npm/wk, 82 PyPI/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | 2/5 (2) | 3.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Leonardo.Ai API
Own models plus FLUX, GPT Image, Ideogram, Nano Banana and Seedream behind one endpoint. No per-image price list outside the logged-in calculator.
Recraft API
Native SVG vector generation, not traced raster. No changelog and no error reference.
Before you call either
Leonardo.Ai API
- Use
POST /api/rest/v2/generationswith amodelname such aslucid-origin - Read the
costobject in each response to track spend, prices aren't published - Send
quality, notmode.modewas retired on 2026-05-04 - Set a webhook callback URL on the key instead of polling long jobs
- Check the deprecations page before relying on a third-party model, removals follow the provider
Recraft API
- Use
/v1/images/generations/vectorwhen the task must return SVG, so the server rejects raster models - Ask for
b64_jsonormultipartif you can't fetch the URL within a day - Name
recraftv4_1_flashfor drafts at $0.007. The defaultrecraftv4_1costs $0.035 - Stay under 100 images a minute and 5 requests a second per user
- Point the OpenAI SDK at
https://external.api.recraft.ai/v1, but expect some parameters to be ignored
Other comparisons with Leonardo.Ai API or Recraft API
- Adobe Firefly API vs Leonardo.Ai API
- Adobe Firefly API vs Recraft API
- Black Forest Labs FLUX API vs Leonardo.Ai API
- Black Forest Labs FLUX API vs Recraft API
- fal image models vs Leonardo.Ai API
- fal image models vs Recraft API
- Google Imagen vs Leonardo.Ai API
- Google Imagen vs Recraft API
- Ideogram API vs Leonardo.Ai API
- Ideogram API vs Recraft API
- Leonardo.Ai API vs OpenAI Image API
- Leonardo.Ai API vs Replicate image models
- Leonardo.Ai API vs Stability AI Image API
- OpenAI Image API vs Recraft API
- Recraft API vs Replicate image models
- Recraft API vs Stability AI Image API
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/leonardo-ai.json·/api/v1/tools/recraft.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/leonardo-ai-vs-recraft.md