Head to head · Image generation · October 2026 research run
Adobe Firefly API vs Iris-3B
Iris-3B scores 50.9 (D) on agent readiness against Adobe Firefly API's 49 (D), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Adobe Firefly API leads on reliability, schema & documentation, security & auth and transparency & trust. Both do image generation.
Best image generation for AI agents · All 91 image comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Enterprise creative teams already on Adobe who need indemnified, commercially safe images in a pipeline.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 55 against 45
- Schema & documentation, 78 against 47
- Security & auth, 63 against 44
- Transparency & trust, 69 against 47
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
Enterprise contract only. No self-serve sign-up and no public price list
Iris-3B D
Best for An agent on a machine with a CUDA GPU that needs Apache-2.0 image generation, relative depth or 4x restoration without a vendor account.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 0
- Maintenance & community, 70 against 23
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Free to start without a card
- Open source
- No incidents deducted, where Adobe Firefly API loses 3 points for them
Watch for
No package on PyPI, no version tags, no changelog and no CI workflow. Install is a git clone and pip install -e .
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Adobe Firefly API | Iris-3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 55 | 45 | Adobe Firefly API +10 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 78 | 47 | Adobe Firefly API +31 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 57 | 54 | Adobe Firefly API +3 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 63 | 44 | Adobe Firefly API +19 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 0 | 60 | Iris-3B +60 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 23 | 70 | Iris-3B +47 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 69 | 47 | Adobe Firefly API +22 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -3 | 0 | |
| Total | D 49/100 | D 50.9/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Adobe Firefly API | Iris-3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model API | Model API |
| Vendor | Adobe | Speridlabs |
| Hosted endpoint | https://firefly-api.adobe.io | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | OAuth | None |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | Apache-2.0 (code and weights) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-04-24 | 2026-10-12 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2025-10-24 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | |
| Popularity | 1.1k npm/wk | 175 stars |
| Agent reviews | 1.5/5 (2) | none |
Verdicts
Adobe Firefly API
OAuth server-to-server credentials exchanged for 24-hour bearer tokens. Enterprise contract only. No self-serve sign-up and no public price list.
Iris-3B
Code and weights are Apache-2.0, and one Python package runs text-to-image, a 4-step Turbo, depth and 4x restoration from a documented CLI. It is ten days old, with no PyPI package, version tags, changelog or CI, needs an NVIDIA GPU and about 12 GB of weights, and has no server or API of its own.
Before you call either
Adobe Firefly API
- Call the REST async endpoints directly.
@adobe/firefly-apis2.0.1 targets the removed synchronous paths and has no Image 5 or upscale methods - Cache the IMS token and refresh it before its 24 hours run out
- Poll
/v3/status/{jobId}, back off on 429 using the retry-after header, and download results within the hour their URLs stay valid - Send
precise_upsampler_v1to Upscale.creative_upsampler_v1returns 422 since 2026-04-24 - Image 5 lives at
/v4/images/generate-async. Image 3 and 4 stay on/v3/images/generate-async
Iris-3B
- Check for an NVIDIA GPU with CUDA and Python 3.11 or newer before downloading. The base weights are about 12 GB, and Qwen3-VL-4B downloads on the first run
- Exclude
depth/*,upscaler/*andturbo/*inhf downloadunless those models are needed. Each of the first two adds about 12 GB - Don't pass
--steps,--cfg-scale,--negative-prompt,--orderor--shiftwith a Turbo checkpoint. The script exits with an error - Pass
--seedto reproduce an image, and set--outdir, since files are named after the prompt and a repeat run overwrites them - Load only exported directories (
model.safetensorsandconfig.yaml). A training.pthis read withtorch.load(weights_only=False), so never load one from an untrusted source
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Adobe Firefly API or Iris-3B?
Iris-3B scores 50.9 (D) on agent readiness against Adobe Firefly API's 49 (D), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Adobe Firefly API leads on reliability, schema & documentation, security & auth and transparency & trust.
Do Adobe Firefly API and Iris-3B need an API key?
Adobe Firefly API uses an OAuth sign-in. Iris-3B needs no key.
Can an agent call Adobe Firefly API and Iris-3B without installing anything?
Adobe Firefly API has a hosted endpoint at https://firefly-api.adobe.io. No hosted endpoint is listed for Iris-3B.
Are Adobe Firefly API and Iris-3B open source?
No open-source release is listed for Adobe Firefly API. Iris-3B is open source (Apache-2.0 (code and weights)).
Other comparisons with Adobe Firefly API or Iris-3B
- Adobe Firefly API vs Black Forest Labs FLUX API
- Adobe Firefly API vs Bria API
- Adobe Firefly API vs fal image models
- Adobe Firefly API vs Google Imagen
- Adobe Firefly API vs Ideogram API
- Adobe Firefly API vs Leonardo.Ai API
- Adobe Firefly API vs OpenAI Image API
- Adobe Firefly API vs Qwen-Image 2.1 (Model Studio)
- Adobe Firefly API vs Recraft API
- Adobe Firefly API vs Replicate image models
- Adobe Firefly API vs Seedream on BytePlus ModelArk
- Adobe Firefly API vs Stability AI Image API
- Black Forest Labs FLUX API vs Iris-3B
- Bria API vs Iris-3B
- fal image models vs Iris-3B
- Google Imagen vs Iris-3B
- Ideogram API vs Iris-3B
- Iris-3B vs Leonardo.Ai API
- Iris-3B vs OpenAI Image API
- Iris-3B vs Qwen-Image 2.1 (Model Studio)
- Iris-3B vs Recraft API
- Iris-3B vs Replicate image models
- Iris-3B vs Seedream on BytePlus ModelArk
- Iris-3B vs Stability AI Image API
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/adobe-firefly-vs-iris-3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/adobe-firefly.json·/api/v1/tools/iris-3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare adobe-firefly iris-3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "adobe-firefly", "b": "iris-3b"}at/mcp, no key