Head to head · Secrets store · October 2026 research run
Infisical vs Phase
Infisical scores 83.7 (A) on agent readiness against Phase's 68 (B), and leads in every scored category. Both do secrets store.
Which one, for what
Good for Teams that want an open-source secrets manager they can self-host, and for coding agents run under Agent Vault so they call APIs without ever holding a token.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 100 against 91
- Schema & documentation, 87 against 58
- Agent ergonomics, 91 against 56
- Security & auth, 91 against 83
- Payments & pricing, 30 against 25
- Maintenance & community, 90 against 83
- Transparency & trust, 83 against 73
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Runs on your own machine
Watch for
Free has no audit logs, Pro keeps them 30 days, and dynamic secrets need Advanced at $40 an identity a month
Phase B
Good for Small teams that want an open-source secrets manager hosted in the EU or self-hosted, with coding agents kept away from values through the CLI.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No OpenAPI document was found. The REST reference is prose with examples, covering 47 operations
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Infisical | Phase | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 100 | 91 | Infisical +9 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 87 | 58 | Infisical +29 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 91 | 56 | Infisical +35 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 91 | 83 | Infisical +8 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 25 | Infisical +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 90 | 83 | Infisical +7 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 83 | 73 | Infisical +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 83.7 · A | 68 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Infisical | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Infisical | Phi Security Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | https://app.infisical.com/api | https://api.phase.dev |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT (core), proprietary under ee/ | MIT outside the ee/ directories, which are under the proprietary Phase Console Enterprise licence |
| Tools exposed | 10 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-23 | 2026-10-04 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | 2025-10-06 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2025-09-15 | 2026-03-11 |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 28k stars, 305k npm/wk, 391k PyPI/wk | 928 stars, 2.5k npm/wk, 235 PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.8/5 (8) | none |
Verdicts
Infisical
Agent Vault and Agent Proxy attach credentials at the proxy, so the agent's context never contains them. Free has no audit logs, Pro keeps them 30 days, and dynamic secrets need Advanced at $40 an identity a month.
Phase
Service account tokens can be minted with an expiry over the API, every secret read is logged, and the CLI redacts values when it detects an AI agent. No OpenAPI document or pagination was found in the reviewed documentation, and the Free plan keeps audit logs for 24 hours.
Before you call either
Infisical
- Run a coding agent under
infisical agent-vault runwith a bundle that allows only the hosts, methods and paths it needs, and set --ttl to the job length - Start @infisical/mcp with INFISICAL_ENABLED_TOOLS=list-projects,list-secrets,get-secret and INFISICAL_MASK_SECRET_VALUES=true unless the model must see a value
- Log in once with Universal Auth and keep the access token for its TTL, since identity logins count against the per-IP write limit
- Pass viewSecretValue=false to GET /api/v4/secrets when you only need names, and expandSecretReferences=true when values reference other secrets
- On a 429 read the seconds from the message field and wait that long; don't retry a POST after a 5xx without checking it didn't land
Phase
- Enable server-side encryption on the app before calling
/v1/secrets. Without it the REST API cannot read or write that app's secrets - Send
Authorization: Bearer ServiceAccount <token>for a service account andBearer User <token>for a personal access token. The token type is part of the header - Stay under 120 requests a minute per account on Free and 240 on Pro, and wait the seconds in the
retry-afterheader on a 429 - Treat a 409 on
POST /v1/secretsas the key already existing at that path, and usePUTto change it. Rotating secrets rejectPUTandDELETE - Have a person run
phase ai enableand choose masked values. The CLI blocks an agent from runningphase ai enableorphase ai disableitself
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Infisical or Phase?
Infisical scores 83.7 (A) on agent readiness against Phase's 68 (B), and leads in every scored category.
Do Infisical and Phase need an API key?
Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Infisical and Phase without installing anything?
Yes. Infisical has a hosted endpoint at https://app.infisical.com/api and Phase at https://api.phase.dev.
Are Infisical and Phase open source?
Yes. Infisical is open source (MIT (core), proprietary under ee/). Phase is open source (MIT outside the `ee/` directories, which are under the proprietary Phase Console Enterprise licence).
Other comparisons with Infisical or Phase
- 1Password service accounts, SDKs and Environments MCP vs Infisical
- 1Password service accounts, SDKs and Environments MCP vs Phase
- Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) vs Infisical
- Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) vs Phase
- AWS Secrets Manager vs Infisical
- AWS Secrets Manager vs Phase
- Azure Key Vault vs Infisical
- Azure Key Vault vs Phase
- Bitwarden Secrets Manager vs Infisical
- Bitwarden Secrets Manager vs Phase
- Doppler vs Infisical
- Doppler vs Phase
- Google Cloud Secret Manager vs Infisical
- Google Cloud Secret Manager vs Phase
- HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server vs Infisical
- HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server vs Phase
- Infisical vs Keeper Secrets Manager
- Infisical vs Pulumi ESC
- Keeper Secrets Manager vs Phase
- Phase vs Pulumi ESC
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/infisical-vs-phase.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/infisical.json·/api/v1/tools/phase.json - From a terminal
anchor compare infisical phase(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "infisical", "b": "phase"}at/mcp, no key