Head to head · Secrets store · October 2026 research run
HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server vs Infisical
Infisical has a score of 81.9 (A) against HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server's 64.4 (B). Both do secrets store. The largest gap is agent ergonomics, 27 points.
Which one, for what
Pick HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server for
No category where it leads by five points or more.
Pick Infisical for
- reliability (+19)
- schema & documentation (+13)
- agent ergonomics (+27)
- security & auth (+5)
- maintenance & community (+13)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server | Infisical | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 71 | 90 | Infisical +19 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 74 | 87 | Infisical +13 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 64 | 91 | Infisical +27 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 86 | 91 | Infisical +5 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 30 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 77 | 90 | Infisical +13 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 83 | 85 | Infisical +2 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -5 | 0 | |
| Total | 64.4 · B | 81.9 · A |
Facts side by side
| Fact | HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server | Infisical |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | HashiCorp (IBM) | Infisical |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://app.infisical.com/api |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | BUSL-1.1 (Vault), MPL-2.0 (MCP server) | MIT (core), proprietary under ee/ |
| Tools exposed | 16 | 10 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-23 |
| Popularity | 36k stars | 28k stars, 305k npm/wk, 391k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | 3.8/5 (8) |
Verdicts
HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server
Dynamic secrets with leases, so a database or cloud credential can live for one agent run and be revoked after. The MCP server's newest build is 0.2.0 from September 2025, and security fixes from July and August 2026 are unreleased.
Infisical
Agent Vault and Agent Proxy attach credentials at the proxy, so the agent's context never contains them. Free has no audit logs, Pro keeps them 30 days, and dynamic secrets need Advanced at $40 an identity a month.
Before you call either
HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server
- Prefer a dynamic secret (database, AWS, GCP engines) over a KV read; the lease expires with the run and revoke is one call
- Log in with AppRole or Kubernetes auth and keep the token for its TTL. Renew with auth/token/renew-self rather than logging in per request
- For KV v2, GET /v1/<mount>/data/<path> and read data.data, and pass cas on writes so a retry can't overwrite a newer version
- If you must use the MCP server, build it from main rather than running the 0.2.0 image, run it over stdio, and give it a token limited to one mount
- Ask your operator to set enable_rate_limit_response_headers on the quota so a 429 carries Retry-After
Infisical
- Run a coding agent under
infisical agent-vault runwith a bundle that allows only the hosts, methods and paths it needs, and set --ttl to the job length - Start @infisical/mcp with INFISICAL_ENABLED_TOOLS=list-projects,list-secrets,get-secret and INFISICAL_MASK_SECRET_VALUES=true unless the model must see a value
- Log in once with Universal Auth and keep the access token for its TTL, since identity logins count against the per-IP write limit
- Pass viewSecretValue=false to GET /api/v4/secrets when you only need names, and expandSecretReferences=true when values reference other secrets
- On a 429 read the seconds from the message field and wait that long; don't retry a POST after a 5xx without checking it didn't land
Other comparisons with HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server or Infisical
- 1Password service accounts, SDKs and Environments MCP vs HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server
- 1Password service accounts, SDKs and Environments MCP vs Infisical
- Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) vs HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server
- Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) vs Infisical
- AWS Secrets Manager vs HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server
- AWS Secrets Manager vs Infisical
- Bitwarden Secrets Manager vs HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server
- Bitwarden Secrets Manager vs Infisical
- Doppler vs HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server
- Doppler vs Infisical
- Google Cloud Secret Manager vs HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server
- Google Cloud Secret Manager vs Infisical
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/hashicorp-vault.json·/api/v1/tools/infisical.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/hashicorp-vault-vs-infisical.md