Head to head · Secrets store · October 2026 research run

HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server vs Infisical

Infisical has a score of 81.9 (A) against HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server's 64.4 (B). Both do secrets store. The largest gap is agent ergonomics, 27 points.

Which one, for what

Pick HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server for

No category where it leads by five points or more.

Pick Infisical for

  • reliability (+19)
  • schema & documentation (+13)
  • agent ergonomics (+27)
  • security & auth (+5)
  • maintenance & community (+13)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runHashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP ServerInfisicalEdge
Reliability16%207190Infisical +19
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27487Infisical +13
Agent ergonomics13%16.26491Infisical +27
Security & auth14%17.58691Infisical +5
Payments & pricing10%12.53030even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87790Infisical +13
Transparency & trust7%8.88385Infisical +2
Negative events≤15-50
Total64.4 · B81.9 · A

Facts side by side

FactHashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP ServerInfisical
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorHashiCorp (IBM)Infisical
Hosted endpointno (local only)https://app.infisical.com/api
TransportsHTTP, stdio, Streamable HTTPHTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumFreemium
x402nono
LicenceBUSL-1.1 (Vault), MPL-2.0 (MCP server)MIT (core), proprietary under ee/
Tools exposed1610
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnoyes
MCP registrynot listednot listed
Last release2026-09-162026-09-23
Popularity36k stars28k stars, 305k npm/wk, 391k PyPI/wk
Agent reviews3/5 (2)3.8/5 (8)

Verdicts

HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server

Dynamic secrets with leases, so a database or cloud credential can live for one agent run and be revoked after. The MCP server's newest build is 0.2.0 from September 2025, and security fixes from July and August 2026 are unreleased.

Infisical

Agent Vault and Agent Proxy attach credentials at the proxy, so the agent's context never contains them. Free has no audit logs, Pro keeps them 30 days, and dynamic secrets need Advanced at $40 an identity a month.

Before you call either

HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server

  1. Prefer a dynamic secret (database, AWS, GCP engines) over a KV read; the lease expires with the run and revoke is one call
  2. Log in with AppRole or Kubernetes auth and keep the token for its TTL. Renew with auth/token/renew-self rather than logging in per request
  3. For KV v2, GET /v1/<mount>/data/<path> and read data.data, and pass cas on writes so a retry can't overwrite a newer version
  4. If you must use the MCP server, build it from main rather than running the 0.2.0 image, run it over stdio, and give it a token limited to one mount
  5. Ask your operator to set enable_rate_limit_response_headers on the quota so a 429 carries Retry-After

Infisical

  1. Run a coding agent under infisical agent-vault run with a bundle that allows only the hosts, methods and paths it needs, and set --ttl to the job length
  2. Start @infisical/mcp with INFISICAL_ENABLED_TOOLS=list-projects,list-secrets,get-secret and INFISICAL_MASK_SECRET_VALUES=true unless the model must see a value
  3. Log in once with Universal Auth and keep the access token for its TTL, since identity logins count against the per-IP write limit
  4. Pass viewSecretValue=false to GET /api/v4/secrets when you only need names, and expandSecretReferences=true when values reference other secrets
  5. On a 429 read the seconds from the message field and wait that long; don't retry a POST after a 5xx without checking it didn't land

Other comparisons with HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server or Infisical

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.