Head to head · Secrets store · October 2026 research run
Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) vs Infisical
Infisical has a score of 81.9 (A) against Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server)'s 73.7 (BB). Both do secrets store. The largest gap is agent ergonomics, 28 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) for
No category where it leads by five points or more.
Pick Infisical for
- schema & documentation (+6)
- agent ergonomics (+28)
- payments & pricing (+5)
- maintenance & community (+8)
- transparency & trust (+12)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) | Infisical | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 90 | 90 | even |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 81 | 87 | Infisical +6 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 63 | 91 | Infisical +28 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 89 | 91 | Infisical +2 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 25 | 30 | Infisical +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 82 | 90 | Infisical +8 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 73 | 85 | Infisical +12 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 73.7 · BB | 81.9 · A |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) | Infisical |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model platform | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Akeyless | Infisical |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.akeyless.io | https://app.infisical.com/api |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (SDKs), closed platform | MIT (core), proprietary under ee/ |
| Tools exposed | none | 10 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-23 |
| Popularity | 2 stars, 3.5k npm/wk, 219k PyPI/wk | 28k stars, 305k npm/wk, 391k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | 3.8/5 (8) |
Verdicts
Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server)
Gateway-brokered SecretlessAI and a runtime-authority MCP server with 4 tools that return results, not credentials. No published prices above the free plan; clients and transactions are metered with overage billed at the end of a 12-month contract.
Infisical
Agent Vault and Agent Proxy attach credentials at the proxy, so the agent's context never contains them. Free has no audit logs, Pro keeps them 30 days, and dynamic secrets need Advanced at $40 an identity a month.
Before you call either
Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server)
- Run akeyless mcp-runtime-authority, not akeyless mcp, for an agent that acts on systems; the first returns results, the second has get_secret and get_password
- Authenticate with a cloud identity, Kubernetes or Universal Identity rather than an access key, which the docs reserve for proofs of concept
- Use CLI 1.130.0 or later for either MCP server, and point the client at your Gateway URL
- Count identities and calls before scaling. The free plan allows 5 clients, and calls over a tier's cap (200 a minute on Silver) are billed as extra clients, not refused
- Pass the token in the JSON body of each POST, and page
/list-itemswithpagination-token
Infisical
- Run a coding agent under
infisical agent-vault runwith a bundle that allows only the hosts, methods and paths it needs, and set --ttl to the job length - Start @infisical/mcp with INFISICAL_ENABLED_TOOLS=list-projects,list-secrets,get-secret and INFISICAL_MASK_SECRET_VALUES=true unless the model must see a value
- Log in once with Universal Auth and keep the access token for its TTL, since identity logins count against the per-IP write limit
- Pass viewSecretValue=false to GET /api/v4/secrets when you only need names, and expandSecretReferences=true when values reference other secrets
- On a 429 read the seconds from the message field and wait that long; don't retry a POST after a 5xx without checking it didn't land
Other comparisons with Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) or Infisical
- 1Password service accounts, SDKs and Environments MCP vs Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server)
- 1Password service accounts, SDKs and Environments MCP vs Infisical
- Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) vs AWS Secrets Manager
- Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) vs Bitwarden Secrets Manager
- Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) vs Doppler
- Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) vs Google Cloud Secret Manager
- Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) vs HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server
- AWS Secrets Manager vs Infisical
- Bitwarden Secrets Manager vs Infisical
- Doppler vs Infisical
- Google Cloud Secret Manager vs Infisical
- HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server vs Infisical
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/akeyless.json·/api/v1/tools/infisical.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/akeyless-vs-infisical.md