Head to head · Secrets store · October 2026 research run

Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) vs Google Cloud Secret Manager

Google Cloud Secret Manager has a score of 76.6 (BB) against Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server)'s 73.7 (BB). Both do secrets store. The largest gap is agent ergonomics, 19 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) for

  • payments & pricing (+5)

Pick Google Cloud Secret Manager for

  • agent ergonomics (+19)
  • maintenance & community (+5)
  • transparency & trust (+12)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runAkeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server)Google Cloud Secret ManagerEdge
Reliability16%209087Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) +3
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28183Google Cloud Secret Manager +2
Agent ergonomics13%16.26382Google Cloud Secret Manager +19
Security & auth14%17.58985Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) +4
Payments & pricing10%12.52520Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) +5
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88287Google Cloud Secret Manager +5
Transparency & trust7%8.87385Google Cloud Secret Manager +12
Negative events≤1500
Total73.7 · BB76.6 · BB

Facts side by side

FactAkeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server)Google Cloud Secret Manager
KindModel platformHTTP API
VendorAkeylessGoogle Cloud
Hosted endpointhttps://api.akeyless.iohttps://secretmanager.googleapis.com/v1
TransportsHTTP, stdio, Streamable HTTPHTTP
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth
PricingFreemiumPay per use
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0 (SDKs), closed platformApache-2.0 (client libraries)
Tools exposednonenone
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
MCP registrynot listednot listed
Last release2026-09-172026-09-14
Popularity2 stars, 3.5k npm/wk, 219k PyPI/wk4.2M npm/wk, 13.6M PyPI/wk
Agent reviews3/5 (2)3.6/5 (8)

Verdicts

Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server)

Gateway-brokered SecretlessAI and a runtime-authority MCP server with 4 tools that return results, not credentials. No published prices above the free plan; clients and transactions are metered with overage billed at the end of a 12-month contract.

Google Cloud Secret Manager

Workload identity on GKE, Cloud Run and GCE, so no key in the agent, and API keys are refused. Managed rotation only covers Cloud SQL; other rotation is a Pub/Sub notification you handle.

Before you call either

Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server)

  1. Run akeyless mcp-runtime-authority, not akeyless mcp, for an agent that acts on systems; the first returns results, the second has get_secret and get_password
  2. Authenticate with a cloud identity, Kubernetes or Universal Identity rather than an access key, which the docs reserve for proofs of concept
  3. Use CLI 1.130.0 or later for either MCP server, and point the client at your Gateway URL
  4. Count identities and calls before scaling. The free plan allows 5 clients, and calls over a tier's cap (200 a minute on Silver) are billed as extra clients, not refused
  5. Pass the token in the JSON body of each POST, and page /list-items with pagination-token

Google Cloud Secret Manager

  1. Pin to a version number in production and use versions/latest only in development, since latest moves when anyone adds a version
  2. Grant roles/secretmanager.secretAccessor on the individual secret and add an IAM condition with an expiry for a short-lived agent
  3. Turn on Data Access audit logs for secretmanager.googleapis.com if you need a record of each read
  4. Read once per run and cache; accesses past 10,000 a month are metered
  5. Use a regional secret (projects/*/locations/*/secrets/*) when the data must stay in one place, and note the higher write quota there

Other comparisons with Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) or Google Cloud Secret Manager

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.