Head to head · Guard self host · October 2026 research run
Granite Guardian vs Presidio
Presidio scores 66 (B) on agent readiness against Granite Guardian's 60.1 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Granite Guardian leads on security & auth and transparency & trust. Both do guard self host.
Which one, for what
Good for A team with a GPU that wants one English-language judge for harm, jailbreaks, RAG groundedness, function-call checks and house rules, under a permissive licence with no gate.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 58 against 53
- Transparency & trust, 70 against 65
Watch for
Trained and tested on English only, per the model card
Presidio B
Good for Detecting and masking personal data in prompts, outputs, logs and images on the owner's own machines, with detection tuned by entity, threshold and custom recognisers.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 78 against 56
- Schema & documentation, 69 against 60
- Maintenance & community, 63 against 47
Also in its favour
- Open source
Watch for
The REST containers have no authentication by design. The FAQ says to put a gateway or proxy in front
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Granite Guardian | Presidio | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 56 | 78 | Presidio +22 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 60 | 69 | Presidio +9 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 69 | 69 | even |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 58 | 53 | Granite Guardian +5 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 47 | 63 | Presidio +16 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 70 | 65 | Granite Guardian +5 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 60.1 · C | 66 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Granite Guardian | Presidio |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model API | SDK + MCP |
| Vendor | IBM | Data Privacy Stack |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache 2.0 for the weights and the repository | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-04-29 | 2026-07-22 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 182 stars | 11k stars, 1.2M PyPI/wk |
Verdicts
Granite Guardian
One ungated Apache 2.0 model judges harm, jailbreaks, RAG groundedness, function-call errors and custom criteria, with signed weights and published evaluation code. It is trained and tested on English only, each call checks one criterion, the 4.1 prompt format differs from 3.x, and IBM's watsonx.ai lists only the deprecated 3.0 model.
Presidio
MIT-licensed personal data detector with a public OpenAPI document, tests on Python 3.10 to 3.14 and about 1.2 million weekly PyPI downloads. The REST containers have no authentication, the project states no SLA or support, and it covers personal data only, with no prompt injection or content moderation checks.
Before you call either
Granite Guardian
- Append the
<guardian>block as the final user message, with the mode line,### Criteria:and### Scoring Schema:. Copy the strings from the model card, because no package builds them - Use the no-think instruction for gating and parse
<score>. Think mode writes a reasoning trace first, and the card's examples allow up to 2,048 output tokens - Treat
yesas the criterion being met, which for built-in criteria means the risk is present. Treat a missing<score>tag as a failed check - Pass retrieved text through
documents=and tool schemas throughavailable_tools=inapply_chat_template, not inside the message text - Under Ollama, set
num_ctxin the request options. IBM's docs say the default context is short and long requests are truncated
Presidio
- Install from PyPI or pull images from ghcr.io/data-privacy-stack. The mcr.microsoft.com/presidio-* images are no longer updated
- Download a spaCy model (python -m spacy download en_core_web_lg) before the first
AnalyzerEngine()call, or use the Docker image - Send both text and language to
/analyze. A request missing either returns HTTP 500 with a JSON error field - Pass entities and score_threshold to limit results. Many country-specific recognisers are disabled by default and need enabling in the registry YAML
- Keep the containers on a private network or behind your own authenticating proxy. They accept any caller
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Granite Guardian or Presidio?
Presidio scores 66 (B) on agent readiness against Granite Guardian's 60.1 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Granite Guardian leads on security & auth and transparency & trust.
Can an agent call Granite Guardian and Presidio without installing anything?
No hosted endpoint is listed for Granite Guardian. No hosted endpoint is listed for Presidio.
Are Granite Guardian and Presidio open source?
No open-source release is listed for Granite Guardian. Presidio is open source (MIT).
Other comparisons with Granite Guardian or Presidio
- Amazon Bedrock Guardrails vs Granite Guardian
- Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields) vs Granite Guardian
- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Granite Guardian
- Google Cloud Model Armor vs Granite Guardian
- Granite Guardian vs LlamaFirewall
- Granite Guardian vs Guardrails AI
- Granite Guardian vs Lakera Guard (Check Point AI Guardrails)
- Granite Guardian vs Llama Guard 4
- Granite Guardian vs Mistral Moderation API
- Granite Guardian vs NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails
- Granite Guardian vs OpenAI Guardrails
- Granite Guardian vs OpenAI Moderation API
- Granite Guardian vs Prisma AIRS AI Runtime Security API
- Amazon Bedrock Guardrails vs Presidio
- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Presidio
- Google Cloud Model Armor vs Presidio
- Guardrails AI vs Presidio
- Lakera Guard (Check Point AI Guardrails) vs Presidio
- LlamaFirewall vs Presidio
- Presidio vs Mistral Moderation API
- Presidio vs NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails
- Presidio vs OpenAI Guardrails
- Presidio vs Prisma AIRS AI Runtime Security API
- Llama Guard 4 vs Presidio
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/granite-guardian-vs-microsoft-presidio.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/granite-guardian.json·/api/v1/tools/microsoft-presidio.json - From a terminal
anchor compare granite-guardian microsoft-presidio(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "granite-guardian", "b": "microsoft-presidio"}at/mcp, no key