Head to head · Guard injection · October 2026 research run

Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Granite Guardian

Cisco AI Defense Inspection API scores 61.3 (C) on agent readiness against Granite Guardian's 60.1 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Granite Guardian leads on payments & pricing. Both do guard injection.

Which one, for what

Cisco AI Defense Inspection API C

Good for A company already buying Cisco security through Security Cloud Control that wants its own application to decide what to do with each verdict.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 80 against 56
  • Security & auth, 81 against 58
  • Maintenance & community, 80 against 47
  • Transparency & trust, 76 against 70

Also in its favour

  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install

Watch for

No public price, free tier or trial for the Inspection API. Subscriptions are bought through sales and activated with a claim code

Granite Guardian C

Good for A team with a GPU that wants one English-language judge for harm, jailbreaks, RAG groundedness, function-call checks and house rules, under a permissive licence with no gate.

Ahead on

  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 0

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it
  • No incidents deducted, where Cisco AI Defense Inspection API loses 3 points for them

Watch for

Trained and tested on English only, per the model card

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runCisco AI Defense Inspection APIGranite GuardianEdge
Reliability16%208056Cisco AI Defense Inspection API +24
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.25960Granite Guardian +1
Agent ergonomics13%16.26769Granite Guardian +2
Security & auth14%17.58158Cisco AI Defense Inspection API +23
Payments & pricing10%12.5060Granite Guardian +60
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88047Cisco AI Defense Inspection API +33
Transparency & trust7%8.87670Cisco AI Defense Inspection API +6
Negative events≤15-30
Total61.3 · C60.1 · C

Facts side by side

FactCisco AI Defense Inspection APIGranite Guardian
KindHTTP APIModel API
VendorCisco Systems, Inc.IBM
Hosted endpointhttps://us.api.inspect.aidefense.security.cisco.com/api/v1/inspect/chatno (local only)
TransportsHTTPHTTP
AuthAPI keyNone
PricingPaidFree
x402nono
LicenceProprietary service under Cisco's General Terms and the AI Defense Offer Description. The Python SDK is Apache-2.0Apache 2.0 for the weights and the repository
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnono
Last release2026-09-232026-04-29
Terms last updatedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Popularity35 stars, 4k PyPI/wk182 stars

Verdicts

Cisco AI Defense Inspection API

Per-connection API keys with expiry, revocation and regeneration, published limits of 60,000 calls a minute, weekly dated release notes and a one-year retention statement suit companies already on Cisco Security Cloud Control. Access needs a subscription bought through sales, with no public price or trial for the API, and the developer changelog has one entry from February 2025.

Granite Guardian

One ungated Apache 2.0 model judges harm, jailbreaks, RAG groundedness, function-call errors and custom criteria, with signed weights and published evaluation code. It is trained and tested on English only, each call checks one criterion, the 4.1 prompt format differs from 3.x, and IBM's watsonx.ai lists only the deprecated 3.0 model.

Before you call either

Cisco AI Defense Inspection API

  1. Send the key in X-Cisco-AI-Defense-API-Key to POST /api/v1/inspect/chat on the regional host where the tenant was created. US, Europe and Asia Pacific hosts differ
  2. If the connection has a policy, enabled_rules in the request is ignored. Pass enabled_rules only for connections with no policy
  3. The API never blocks anything itself. Read is_safe and action in the response and enforce the decision in your own code
  4. On 429, wait and retry. The organisation has gone over one million tokens in parallel or 60,000 calls a minute
  5. Don't request the Toxicity rule. It was removed on 16 September 2026, and the Safety rules such as Hate Speech, Harassment and Profanity replace it

Granite Guardian

  1. Append the <guardian> block as the final user message, with the mode line, ### Criteria: and ### Scoring Schema:. Copy the strings from the model card, because no package builds them
  2. Use the no-think instruction for gating and parse <score>. Think mode writes a reasoning trace first, and the card's examples allow up to 2,048 output tokens
  3. Treat yes as the criterion being met, which for built-in criteria means the risk is present. Treat a missing <score> tag as a failed check
  4. Pass retrieved text through documents= and tool schemas through available_tools= in apply_chat_template, not inside the message text
  5. Under Ollama, set num_ctx in the request options. IBM's docs say the default context is short and long requests are truncated

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Cisco AI Defense Inspection API or Granite Guardian?

Cisco AI Defense Inspection API scores 61.3 (C) on agent readiness against Granite Guardian's 60.1 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Granite Guardian leads on payments & pricing.

Do Cisco AI Defense Inspection API and Granite Guardian need an API key?

Cisco AI Defense Inspection API needs an API key. Granite Guardian needs no key.

Can an agent call Cisco AI Defense Inspection API and Granite Guardian without installing anything?

Cisco AI Defense Inspection API has a hosted endpoint at https://us.api.inspect.aidefense.security.cisco.com/api/v1/inspect/chat. No hosted endpoint is listed for Granite Guardian.

Other comparisons with Cisco AI Defense Inspection API or Granite Guardian

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.