Head to head · Guard injection · October 2026 research run
Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Granite Guardian
Cisco AI Defense Inspection API scores 61.3 (C) on agent readiness against Granite Guardian's 60.1 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Granite Guardian leads on payments & pricing. Both do guard injection.
Which one, for what
Cisco AI Defense Inspection API C
Good for A company already buying Cisco security through Security Cloud Control that wants its own application to decide what to do with each verdict.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 80 against 56
- Security & auth, 81 against 58
- Maintenance & community, 80 against 47
- Transparency & trust, 76 against 70
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
No public price, free tier or trial for the Inspection API. Subscriptions are bought through sales and activated with a claim code
Good for A team with a GPU that wants one English-language judge for harm, jailbreaks, RAG groundedness, function-call checks and house rules, under a permissive licence with no gate.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 0
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- No incidents deducted, where Cisco AI Defense Inspection API loses 3 points for them
Watch for
Trained and tested on English only, per the model card
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Cisco AI Defense Inspection API | Granite Guardian | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 80 | 56 | Cisco AI Defense Inspection API +24 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 59 | 60 | Granite Guardian +1 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 67 | 69 | Granite Guardian +2 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 81 | 58 | Cisco AI Defense Inspection API +23 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 0 | 60 | Granite Guardian +60 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 80 | 47 | Cisco AI Defense Inspection API +33 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 76 | 70 | Cisco AI Defense Inspection API +6 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -3 | 0 | |
| Total | 61.3 · C | 60.1 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Cisco AI Defense Inspection API | Granite Guardian |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | Model API |
| Vendor | Cisco Systems, Inc. | IBM |
| Hosted endpoint | https://us.api.inspect.aidefense.security.cisco.com/api/v1/inspect/chat | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | None |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Cisco's General Terms and the AI Defense Offer Description. The Python SDK is Apache-2.0 | Apache 2.0 for the weights and the repository |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-23 | 2026-04-29 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 35 stars, 4k PyPI/wk | 182 stars |
Verdicts
Cisco AI Defense Inspection API
Per-connection API keys with expiry, revocation and regeneration, published limits of 60,000 calls a minute, weekly dated release notes and a one-year retention statement suit companies already on Cisco Security Cloud Control. Access needs a subscription bought through sales, with no public price or trial for the API, and the developer changelog has one entry from February 2025.
Granite Guardian
One ungated Apache 2.0 model judges harm, jailbreaks, RAG groundedness, function-call errors and custom criteria, with signed weights and published evaluation code. It is trained and tested on English only, each call checks one criterion, the 4.1 prompt format differs from 3.x, and IBM's watsonx.ai lists only the deprecated 3.0 model.
Before you call either
Cisco AI Defense Inspection API
- Send the key in
X-Cisco-AI-Defense-API-KeytoPOST /api/v1/inspect/chaton the regional host where the tenant was created. US, Europe and Asia Pacific hosts differ - If the connection has a policy,
enabled_rulesin the request is ignored. Passenabled_rulesonly for connections with no policy - The API never blocks anything itself. Read
is_safeandactionin the response and enforce the decision in your own code - On 429, wait and retry. The organisation has gone over one million tokens in parallel or 60,000 calls a minute
- Don't request the Toxicity rule. It was removed on 16 September 2026, and the Safety rules such as Hate Speech, Harassment and Profanity replace it
Granite Guardian
- Append the
<guardian>block as the final user message, with the mode line,### Criteria:and### Scoring Schema:. Copy the strings from the model card, because no package builds them - Use the no-think instruction for gating and parse
<score>. Think mode writes a reasoning trace first, and the card's examples allow up to 2,048 output tokens - Treat
yesas the criterion being met, which for built-in criteria means the risk is present. Treat a missing<score>tag as a failed check - Pass retrieved text through
documents=and tool schemas throughavailable_tools=inapply_chat_template, not inside the message text - Under Ollama, set
num_ctxin the request options. IBM's docs say the default context is short and long requests are truncated
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Cisco AI Defense Inspection API or Granite Guardian?
Cisco AI Defense Inspection API scores 61.3 (C) on agent readiness against Granite Guardian's 60.1 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Granite Guardian leads on payments & pricing.
Do Cisco AI Defense Inspection API and Granite Guardian need an API key?
Cisco AI Defense Inspection API needs an API key. Granite Guardian needs no key.
Can an agent call Cisco AI Defense Inspection API and Granite Guardian without installing anything?
Cisco AI Defense Inspection API has a hosted endpoint at https://us.api.inspect.aidefense.security.cisco.com/api/v1/inspect/chat. No hosted endpoint is listed for Granite Guardian.
Other comparisons with Cisco AI Defense Inspection API or Granite Guardian
- Amazon Bedrock Guardrails vs Cisco AI Defense Inspection API
- Amazon Bedrock Guardrails vs Granite Guardian
- Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields) vs Cisco AI Defense Inspection API
- Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields) vs Granite Guardian
- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Google Cloud Model Armor
- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Guardrails AI
- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Lakera Guard (Check Point AI Guardrails)
- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs LlamaFirewall
- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails
- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs OpenAI Guardrails
- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Prisma AIRS AI Runtime Security API
- Google Cloud Model Armor vs Granite Guardian
- Granite Guardian vs LlamaFirewall
- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Llama Guard 4
- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Mistral Moderation API
- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs OpenAI Moderation API
- Granite Guardian vs Guardrails AI
- Granite Guardian vs Lakera Guard (Check Point AI Guardrails)
- Granite Guardian vs Llama Guard 4
- Granite Guardian vs Mistral Moderation API
- Granite Guardian vs NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails
- Granite Guardian vs OpenAI Guardrails
- Granite Guardian vs OpenAI Moderation API
- Granite Guardian vs Prisma AIRS AI Runtime Security API
- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Presidio
- Granite Guardian vs Presidio
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-granite-guardian.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/cisco-ai-defense-inspection.json·/api/v1/tools/granite-guardian.json - From a terminal
anchor compare cisco-ai-defense-inspection granite-guardian(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "cisco-ai-defense-inspection", "b": "granite-guardian"}at/mcp, no key