Head to head · Guard pii · October 2026 research run
Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Presidio
Presidio scores 66 (B) on agent readiness against Cisco AI Defense Inspection API's 61.3 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Cisco AI Defense Inspection API leads on security & auth, maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do guard pii.
Which one, for what
Cisco AI Defense Inspection API C
Good for A company already buying Cisco security through Security Cloud Control that wants its own application to decide what to do with each verdict.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 81 against 53
- Maintenance & community, 80 against 63
- Transparency & trust, 76 against 65
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
No public price, free tier or trial for the Inspection API. Subscriptions are bought through sales and activated with a claim code
Presidio B
Good for Detecting and masking personal data in prompts, outputs, logs and images on the owner's own machines, with detection tuned by entity, threshold and custom recognisers.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 69 against 59
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 0
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Open source
- No incidents deducted, where Cisco AI Defense Inspection API loses 3 points for them
Watch for
The REST containers have no authentication by design. The FAQ says to put a gateway or proxy in front
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Cisco AI Defense Inspection API | Presidio | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 80 | 78 | Cisco AI Defense Inspection API +2 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 59 | 69 | Presidio +10 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 67 | 69 | Presidio +2 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 81 | 53 | Cisco AI Defense Inspection API +28 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 0 | 60 | Presidio +60 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 80 | 63 | Cisco AI Defense Inspection API +17 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 76 | 65 | Cisco AI Defense Inspection API +11 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -3 | 0 | |
| Total | 61.3 · C | 66 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Cisco AI Defense Inspection API | Presidio |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | SDK + MCP |
| Vendor | Cisco Systems, Inc. | Data Privacy Stack |
| Hosted endpoint | https://us.api.inspect.aidefense.security.cisco.com/api/v1/inspect/chat | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | None |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Cisco's General Terms and the AI Defense Offer Description. The Python SDK is Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-23 | 2026-07-22 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 35 stars, 4k PyPI/wk | 11k stars, 1.2M PyPI/wk |
Verdicts
Cisco AI Defense Inspection API
Per-connection API keys with expiry, revocation and regeneration, published limits of 60,000 calls a minute, weekly dated release notes and a one-year retention statement suit companies already on Cisco Security Cloud Control. Access needs a subscription bought through sales, with no public price or trial for the API, and the developer changelog has one entry from February 2025.
Presidio
MIT-licensed personal data detector with a public OpenAPI document, tests on Python 3.10 to 3.14 and about 1.2 million weekly PyPI downloads. The REST containers have no authentication, the project states no SLA or support, and it covers personal data only, with no prompt injection or content moderation checks.
Before you call either
Cisco AI Defense Inspection API
- Send the key in
X-Cisco-AI-Defense-API-KeytoPOST /api/v1/inspect/chaton the regional host where the tenant was created. US, Europe and Asia Pacific hosts differ - If the connection has a policy,
enabled_rulesin the request is ignored. Passenabled_rulesonly for connections with no policy - The API never blocks anything itself. Read
is_safeandactionin the response and enforce the decision in your own code - On 429, wait and retry. The organisation has gone over one million tokens in parallel or 60,000 calls a minute
- Don't request the Toxicity rule. It was removed on 16 September 2026, and the Safety rules such as Hate Speech, Harassment and Profanity replace it
Presidio
- Install from PyPI or pull images from ghcr.io/data-privacy-stack. The mcr.microsoft.com/presidio-* images are no longer updated
- Download a spaCy model (python -m spacy download en_core_web_lg) before the first
AnalyzerEngine()call, or use the Docker image - Send both text and language to
/analyze. A request missing either returns HTTP 500 with a JSON error field - Pass entities and score_threshold to limit results. Many country-specific recognisers are disabled by default and need enabling in the registry YAML
- Keep the containers on a private network or behind your own authenticating proxy. They accept any caller
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Cisco AI Defense Inspection API or Presidio?
Presidio scores 66 (B) on agent readiness against Cisco AI Defense Inspection API's 61.3 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Cisco AI Defense Inspection API leads on security & auth, maintenance & community and transparency & trust.
Can an agent call Cisco AI Defense Inspection API and Presidio without installing anything?
Cisco AI Defense Inspection API has a hosted endpoint at https://us.api.inspect.aidefense.security.cisco.com/api/v1/inspect/chat. No hosted endpoint is listed for Presidio.
Are Cisco AI Defense Inspection API and Presidio open source?
No open-source release is listed for Cisco AI Defense Inspection API. Presidio is open source (MIT).
Other comparisons with Cisco AI Defense Inspection API or Presidio
- Amazon Bedrock Guardrails vs Cisco AI Defense Inspection API
- Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields) vs Cisco AI Defense Inspection API
- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Google Cloud Model Armor
- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Granite Guardian
- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Guardrails AI
- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Lakera Guard (Check Point AI Guardrails)
- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs LlamaFirewall
- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails
- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs OpenAI Guardrails
- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Prisma AIRS AI Runtime Security API
- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Llama Guard 4
- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Mistral Moderation API
- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs OpenAI Moderation API
- Amazon Bedrock Guardrails vs Presidio
- Google Cloud Model Armor vs Presidio
- Guardrails AI vs Presidio
- Lakera Guard (Check Point AI Guardrails) vs Presidio
- LlamaFirewall vs Presidio
- Presidio vs Mistral Moderation API
- Presidio vs NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails
- Presidio vs OpenAI Guardrails
- Presidio vs Prisma AIRS AI Runtime Security API
- Granite Guardian vs Presidio
- Llama Guard 4 vs Presidio
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-microsoft-presidio.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/cisco-ai-defense-inspection.json·/api/v1/tools/microsoft-presidio.json - From a terminal
anchor compare cisco-ai-defense-inspection microsoft-presidio(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "cisco-ai-defense-inspection", "b": "microsoft-presidio"}at/mcp, no key