Head to head · Policy enforcement · October 2026 research run

AgentGate vs Granite Guardian

Granite Guardian scores 60.1 (C) on agent readiness against AgentGate's 48.5 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do policy enforcement.

Best guardrails and safety filters for AI agents · All 132 guardrails comparisons

Which one, for what

AgentGate D

Best for A team that wants a self-hosted check between an agent and its shell, database or webhook tools, with a human approval queue.

Also in its favour

  • Runs on your own machine
  • Free to start without a card
  • Open source

Watch for

Agent endpoints need no key unless AG_AGENT_KEY is set, the proxy binds 0.0.0.0:8080, and the dashboard key defaults to dev-key-123

Granite Guardian C

Best for A team with a GPU that wants one English-language judge for harm, jailbreaks, RAG groundedness, function-call checks and house rules, under a permissive licence with no gate.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 56 against 44
  • Schema & documentation, 60 against 47
  • Agent ergonomics, 69 against 53
  • Security & auth, 58 against 49
  • Maintenance & community, 47 against 28
  • Transparency & trust, 70 against 56

Watch for

Trained and tested on English only, per the model card

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runAgentGateGranite GuardianEdge
Reliability16%204456Granite Guardian +12
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.24760Granite Guardian +13
Agent ergonomics13%16.25369Granite Guardian +16
Security & auth14%17.54958Granite Guardian +9
Payments & pricing10%12.56060even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.82847Granite Guardian +19
Transparency & trust7%8.85670Granite Guardian +14
Negative events≤1500
TotalD 48.5/100C 60.1/100

Facts side by side

FactAgentGateGranite Guardian
KindHTTP APIModel API
VendorMohit Singh (mohitdebian)IBM
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
TransportsHTTP, stdioHTTP
AuthNoneNone
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceMITApache 2.0 for the weights and the repository
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnono
Last releasenone2026-04-29
Terms last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Popularity0 stars182 stars

Verdicts

AgentGate

An agent or its host can send each tool call to one REST endpoint, or wrap an MCP server, and get allow, deny or ask from a local classifier and a YAML policy, with an audit log and approval queue. The project is three days old, auth is off by default, and no detection accuracy is published.

Granite Guardian

One ungated Apache 2.0 model judges harm, jailbreaks, RAG groundedness, function-call errors and custom criteria, with signed weights and published evaluation code. It is trained and tested on English only, each call checks one criterion, the 4.1 prompt format differs from 3.x, and IBM's watsonx.ai lists only the deprecated 3.0 model.

Before you call either

AgentGate

  1. Create a session with the user's real goal first. The goal-alignment head scores every later call against it
  2. Pass earlier tool results in history_override with untrusted: true for web or email content, or the injection head sees only the action
  3. On ask, stop and tell the user the decision_id. Polling /v1/decisions/:id needs the dashboard key
  4. Treat allow_with_checkpoint as allow and keep the checkpoint_id for an undo
  5. Expect HTTP 404 with not_found for an unknown session and 401 when the owner has set an agent key

Granite Guardian

  1. Append the <guardian> block as the final user message, with the mode line, ### Criteria: and ### Scoring Schema:. Copy the strings from the model card, because no package builds them
  2. Use the no-think instruction for gating and parse <score>. Think mode writes a reasoning trace first, and the card's examples allow up to 2,048 output tokens
  3. Treat yes as the criterion being met, which for built-in criteria means the risk is present. Treat a missing <score> tag as a failed check
  4. Pass retrieved text through documents= and tool schemas through available_tools= in apply_chat_template, not inside the message text
  5. Under Ollama, set num_ctx in the request options. IBM's docs say the default context is short and long requests are truncated

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, AgentGate or Granite Guardian?

Granite Guardian scores 60.1 (C) on agent readiness against AgentGate's 48.5 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.

Do AgentGate and Granite Guardian need an API key?

Neither needs a key.

Can an agent call AgentGate and Granite Guardian without installing anything?

AgentGate runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. No hosted endpoint is listed for Granite Guardian.

Are AgentGate and Granite Guardian open source?

AgentGate is open source (MIT). No open-source release is listed for Granite Guardian.

Other comparisons with AgentGate or Granite Guardian

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.