Head to head · Policy enforcement · October 2026 research run
AgentGate vs Granite Guardian
Granite Guardian scores 60.1 (C) on agent readiness against AgentGate's 48.5 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do policy enforcement.
Best guardrails and safety filters for AI agents · All 132 guardrails comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for A team that wants a self-hosted check between an agent and its shell, database or webhook tools, with a human approval queue.
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
- Free to start without a card
- Open source
Watch for
Agent endpoints need no key unless AG_AGENT_KEY is set, the proxy binds 0.0.0.0:8080, and the dashboard key defaults to dev-key-123
Best for A team with a GPU that wants one English-language judge for harm, jailbreaks, RAG groundedness, function-call checks and house rules, under a permissive licence with no gate.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 56 against 44
- Schema & documentation, 60 against 47
- Agent ergonomics, 69 against 53
- Security & auth, 58 against 49
- Maintenance & community, 47 against 28
- Transparency & trust, 70 against 56
Watch for
Trained and tested on English only, per the model card
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | AgentGate | Granite Guardian | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 44 | 56 | Granite Guardian +12 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 47 | 60 | Granite Guardian +13 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 53 | 69 | Granite Guardian +16 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 49 | 58 | Granite Guardian +9 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 28 | 47 | Granite Guardian +19 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 56 | 70 | Granite Guardian +14 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 48.5/100 | C 60.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | AgentGate | Granite Guardian |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | Model API |
| Vendor | Mohit Singh (mohitdebian) | IBM |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio | HTTP |
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache 2.0 for the weights and the repository |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | none | 2026-04-29 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 0 stars | 182 stars |
Verdicts
AgentGate
An agent or its host can send each tool call to one REST endpoint, or wrap an MCP server, and get allow, deny or ask from a local classifier and a YAML policy, with an audit log and approval queue. The project is three days old, auth is off by default, and no detection accuracy is published.
Granite Guardian
One ungated Apache 2.0 model judges harm, jailbreaks, RAG groundedness, function-call errors and custom criteria, with signed weights and published evaluation code. It is trained and tested on English only, each call checks one criterion, the 4.1 prompt format differs from 3.x, and IBM's watsonx.ai lists only the deprecated 3.0 model.
Before you call either
AgentGate
- Create a session with the user's real goal first. The goal-alignment head scores every later call against it
- Pass earlier tool results in
history_overridewithuntrusted: truefor web or email content, or the injection head sees only the action - On
ask, stop and tell the user thedecision_id. Polling/v1/decisions/:idneeds the dashboard key - Treat
allow_with_checkpointas allow and keep thecheckpoint_idfor an undo - Expect HTTP 404 with
not_foundfor an unknown session and 401 when the owner has set an agent key
Granite Guardian
- Append the
<guardian>block as the final user message, with the mode line,### Criteria:and### Scoring Schema:. Copy the strings from the model card, because no package builds them - Use the no-think instruction for gating and parse
<score>. Think mode writes a reasoning trace first, and the card's examples allow up to 2,048 output tokens - Treat
yesas the criterion being met, which for built-in criteria means the risk is present. Treat a missing<score>tag as a failed check - Pass retrieved text through
documents=and tool schemas throughavailable_tools=inapply_chat_template, not inside the message text - Under Ollama, set
num_ctxin the request options. IBM's docs say the default context is short and long requests are truncated
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, AgentGate or Granite Guardian?
Granite Guardian scores 60.1 (C) on agent readiness against AgentGate's 48.5 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Do AgentGate and Granite Guardian need an API key?
Neither needs a key.
Can an agent call AgentGate and Granite Guardian without installing anything?
AgentGate runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. No hosted endpoint is listed for Granite Guardian.
Are AgentGate and Granite Guardian open source?
AgentGate is open source (MIT). No open-source release is listed for Granite Guardian.
Other comparisons with AgentGate or Granite Guardian
- Amazon Bedrock Guardrails vs Granite Guardian
- Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields) vs Granite Guardian
- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Granite Guardian
- Google Cloud Model Armor vs Granite Guardian
- Granite Guardian vs LlamaFirewall
- Granite Guardian vs Guardrails AI
- Granite Guardian vs Lakera Guard (Check Point AI Guardrails)
- Granite Guardian vs Llama Guard 4
- Granite Guardian vs Mistral Moderation API
- Granite Guardian vs NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails
- Granite Guardian vs OpenAI Guardrails
- Granite Guardian vs OpenAI Moderation API
- Granite Guardian vs Prisma AIRS AI Runtime Security API
- AgentGate vs Amazon Bedrock Guardrails
- AgentGate vs Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields)
- AgentGate vs Cisco AI Defense Inspection API
- AgentGate vs Google Cloud Model Armor
- AgentGate vs Guardrails AI
- AgentGate vs Lakera Guard (Check Point AI Guardrails)
- AgentGate vs Llama Guard 4
- AgentGate vs LlamaFirewall
- AgentGate vs Mistral Moderation API
- AgentGate vs NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails
- AgentGate vs OpenAI Guardrails
- AgentGate vs Prisma AIRS AI Runtime Security API
- AgentGate vs Presidio
- Granite Guardian vs Presidio
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/agentgate-vs-granite-guardian.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/agentgate.json·/api/v1/tools/granite-guardian.json - From a terminal
anchor compare agentgate granite-guardian(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "agentgate", "b": "granite-guardian"}at/mcp, no key