{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "agentgate", "name": "AgentGate", "vendor": "Mohit Singh (mohitdebian)", "vendorUrl": "https://github.com/mohitdebian/AgentGate", "kind": "http-api", "category": "guardrails", "summary": "AgentGate is an open-source, self-hosted gateway that checks an agent's tool calls before they run. A small local classifier scores each call and a YAML policy returns allow, deny or ask, through a REST API or an MCP stdio wrapper.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/agentgate", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/agentgate.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/agentgate.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/agentgate.json", "repo": "https://github.com/mohitdebian/AgentGate", "license": "MIT", "transports": [ "http", "stdio" ], "packages": [], "auth": "none", "authNotes": "No account. The agent endpoints (`/v1/sessions`, `/v1/assess`) are open unless the owner sets `AG_AGENT_KEY`, then need `Authorization: Bearer \u003ckey\u003e` or `x-agent-key`. Dashboard endpoints need `AG_DASHBOARD_KEY`, which falls back to `dev-key-123` when unset and is also accepted as a `?token=` query parameter. The checkpoint and shadow-summary endpoints have no auth check in the source.", "pricing": "free", "pricingNotes": "Free under MIT with nothing to buy. The owner runs four containers (Postgres, the Python decision service, the Fastify proxy and the dashboard), with an NVIDIA GPU recommended for the classifier and a CPU path in the code.", "priceSummary": "Free · OSS", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the source, the docs or the wiki (checked 2026-10-15). The project has no paid tier.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": 0, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-10-15" }, "docsUrl": "https://github.com/mohitdebian/AgentGate/wiki/Client-Integration-Guide", "openapi": "https://github.com/mohitdebian/AgentGate/blob/main/docs/openapi.yaml", "capabilities": [ "guard.policy", "guard.injection", "guard.self-host" ], "tags": [ "open-source", "self-hosted", "local", "free", "no-card", "mit", "typescript", "python", "mcp", "docker", "openapi" ], "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 48.5, "grade": "D", "agentReady": false, "rank": 883, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1094, "categoryRank": 16, "methodology": "0.4", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 53, "maintenance": 28, "payments": 60, "reliability": 44, "schema": 47, "security": 49, "transparency": 56 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-10-15" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "An agent or its host can send each tool call to one REST endpoint, or wrap an MCP server, and get allow, deny or ask from a local classifier and a YAML policy, with an audit log and approval queue. The project is three days old, auth is off by default, and no detection accuracy is published.", "bestFor": "A team that wants a self-hosted check between an agent and its shell, database or webhook tools, with a human approval queue.", "strengths": [ "One documented call, `POST /v1/assess`, returns a verdict, reason codes and four head probabilities", "Fail-closed defaults. A model error or timeout falls back to ask, and unmatched tools default to ask", "Decisions are logged in Postgres with redacted arguments, a SHA-256 of the full arguments and approval reviewer notes", "MIT code and MIT model weights on Hugging Face with no gate, run entirely on the owner's machines", "Shadow mode and policy replay let an operator test a policy against past decisions before enforcing it" ], "weaknesses": [ "Agent endpoints need no key unless `AG_AGENT_KEY` is set, the proxy binds 0.0.0.0:8080, and the dashboard key defaults to `dev-key-123`", "Checkpoint revert, which runs git on the proxy's workspace, has no auth check in the source of 15 October 2026", "No tagged release, an empty changelog and version 0.1.0, three days after the first commit", "The MCP wrapper treats `allow_with_checkpoint` as an error and does not send the agent key to `/v1/assess`", "No published accuracy or false-positive rate for the classifier, trained in 60 steps per its model card" ], "agentNotes": [ "Create a session with the user's real goal first. The goal-alignment head scores every later call against it", "Pass earlier tool results in `history_override` with `untrusted: true` for web or email content, or the injection head sees only the action", "On `ask`, stop and tell the user the `decision_id`. Polling `/v1/decisions/:id` needs the dashboard key", "Treat `allow_with_checkpoint` as allow and keep the `checkpoint_id` for an undo", "Expect HTTP 404 with `not_found` for an unknown session and 401 when the owner has set an agent key" ], "metrics": { "kind": "local", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "D", "methodology": "0.4", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 48.5 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 53, "maintenance": 28, "payments": 60, "reliability": 44, "schema": 47, "security": 49, "transparency": 59 }, "provenanceScore": 53 }, "connect": { "install": "git clone https://github.com/mohitdebian/AgentGate.git \u0026\u0026 cd AgentGate \u0026\u0026 docker compose up -d", "http": "curl -s -X POST http://localhost:8080/v1/assess -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" -d '{\"session_id\":\"\u003cid from POST /v1/sessions\u003e\",\"action\":{\"tool\":\"bash_exec\",\"arguments\":{\"command\":\"rm -rf /var/www\"}}}'", "config": { "mcpServers": { "postgres": { "args": [ "/path/to/AgentGate/proxy/dist/src/mcp.js", "npx", "-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-postgres", "postgresql://user:pass@localhost:5432/production" ], "command": "node", "env": { "AGENTGATE_URL": "http://localhost:8080" } } } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/guard.policy", "tool": "https://letme.dev/agentgate" }, "area": "models", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Mohit Singh (individual)", "domain": "", "domainRegistered": "", "endpointOnVendorDomain": null, "terms": "", "privacy": "", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "https://github.com/mohitdebian/AgentGate/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-10-15", "notes": [ "The licence file reads Copyright (c) 2026 Mohit Singh. The GitHub account mohitdebian links to mohitbuilds.in, a personal developer page.", "No terms or privacy policy. The software runs on the owner's machines, so there is no vendor endpoint or status page to check.", "SECURITY.md routes reports to GitHub private vulnerability reporting or a personal email, with a 48-hour acknowledgement target. No security.txt, since the project has no website.", "CHANGELOG.md holds a single Unreleased line, \"Initial scaffolding for Phase 1\"." ], "score": 53 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/agentgate.json" }, "answer": "Granite Guardian scores 60.1 (C) on agent readiness against AgentGate's 48.5 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.", "b": { "slug": "granite-guardian", "name": "Granite Guardian", "vendor": "IBM", "vendorUrl": "https://www.ibm.com/granite", "kind": "model", "category": "guardrails", "summary": "Granite Guardian is IBM's family of open-weight judge models. The current 8-billion-parameter release answers yes or no on whether a prompt, response, retrieved context or function call meets a built-in or custom criterion, and the owner runs it.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/granite-guardian", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/granite-guardian.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/granite-guardian.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/granite-guardian.json", "repo": "https://github.com/ibm-granite/granite-guardian", "license": "Apache 2.0 for the weights and the repository", "transports": [ "http" ], "packages": [], "auth": "none", "authNotes": "No account or key is needed to download or run the model. The Hugging Face repository is not gated. A vLLM or Ollama server has whatever authentication the owner adds.", "pricing": "free", "pricingNotes": "Free to download and run under the Apache 2.0 licence, with the owner's hardware as the cost. IBM's watsonx.ai lists only the earlier `ibm/granite-guardian-3-8b`, marked deprecated, at $0.0002 per 1,000 input or output tokens (checked 2026-10-08). Version 4.1 is not on that list.", "priceSummary": "Free", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402. Granite Guardian is a model the owner runs, with no payment route (checked 2026-10-08).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": 182, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-10-08" }, "docsUrl": "https://www.ibm.com/granite/docs/models/guardian", "capabilities": [ "guard.moderation", "guard.policy", "guard.injection", "guard.self-host" ], "tags": [ "model", "open-weights", "self-hosted", "local", "free", "apache-2.0", "judge", "rag", "python", "ollama" ], "lastRelease": "2026-04-29", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 60.1, "grade": "C", "agentReady": false, "rank": 563, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1094, "categoryRank": 10, "methodology": "0.4", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 69, "maintenance": 47, "payments": 60, "reliability": 56, "schema": 60, "security": 58, "transparency": 70 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-10-08" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "One ungated Apache 2.0 model judges harm, jailbreaks, RAG groundedness, function-call errors and custom criteria, with signed weights and published evaluation code. It is trained and tested on English only, each call checks one criterion, the 4.1 prompt format differs from 3.x, and IBM's watsonx.ai lists only the deprecated 3.0 model.", "bestFor": "A team with a GPU that wants one English-language judge for harm, jailbreaks, RAG groundedness, function-call checks and house rules, under a permissive licence with no gate.", "strengths": [ "Weights are ungated on Hugging Face under the Apache 2.0 licence, with IBM's own GGUF builds and an Ollama library entry", "Built-in criteria cover harm, social bias, jailbreaking, violence, profanity, sexual content, unethical behaviour, three RAG checks and function-call hallucination", "A custom criterion is one natural-language sentence in the prompt, and the answer is `yes` or `no` inside `\u003cscore\u003e` tags", "The repository's `evaluation` folder reproduces the card's benchmark figures for versions 3.0 to 4.1", "Weights carry a sigstore signature in `model.sig`, and IBM documents how to verify it" ], "weaknesses": [ "Trained and tested on English only, per the model card", "Each call judges one criterion, so checking several risks takes several calls or a separate LoRA adapter built on the 3.2 model", "Version 4.1 moved the criterion into a `\u003cguardian\u003e` block in the last user message, where 3.x cookbooks pass `guardian_config`", "The repository has no CI, no tests and no `SECURITY.md`, and an issue asking for one has been open since 9 February 2025", "The card's out-of-distribution safety F1 is 0.79 without thinking, below the 0.81 it reports for version 3.3", "IBM's watsonx.ai model list has only `ibm/granite-guardian-3-8b`, marked deprecated, so 4.1 has no hosted endpoint from IBM that we found" ], "agentNotes": [ "Append the `\u003cguardian\u003e` block as the final user message, with the mode line, `### Criteria:` and `### Scoring Schema:`. Copy the strings from the model card, because no package builds them", "Use the no-think instruction for gating and parse `\u003cscore\u003e`. Think mode writes a reasoning trace first, and the card's examples allow up to 2,048 output tokens", "Treat `yes` as the criterion being met, which for built-in criteria means the risk is present. Treat a missing `\u003cscore\u003e` tag as a failed check", "Pass retrieved text through `documents=` and tool schemas through `available_tools=` in `apply_chat_template`, not inside the message text", "Under Ollama, set `num_ctx` in the request options. IBM's docs say the default context is short and long requests are truncated" ], "metrics": { "kind": "local", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "C", "methodology": "0.4", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 60.1 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 69, "maintenance": 47, "payments": 60, "reliability": 56, "schema": 60, "security": 58, "transparency": 67 }, "provenanceScore": 73 }, "connect": { "install": "pip install transformers torch vllm", "http": "curl http://localhost:11434/api/chat \\\n -d '{\"model\": \"granite4.1-guardian:8b\", \"messages\": [{\"role\": \"user\", \"content\": \"Hello!\"}]}'" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/guard.moderation", "tool": "https://letme.dev/granite-guardian" }, "area": "models", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "International Business Machines Corporation", "domain": "ibm.com", "domainRegistered": "1986-03-19", "endpointOnVendorDomain": null, "terms": "", "privacy": "", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "", "securityTxt": "valid", "checked": "2026-10-08", "notes": [ "IBM's naming guidance for Granite names International Business Machines Corporation as the developer and trademark owner.", "The Apache 2.0 licence in the repository is the document that governs use of the weights, so it is recorded as the terms. The Hugging Face repository declares the same licence in its metadata and has no licence file of its own.", "No privacy policy governs the model, because the owner runs it and no input reaches IBM. The privacy field is left out.", "www.ibm.com/.well-known/security.txt is present with PSIRT, HackerOne and email contacts and expires on 8 November 2026.", "RDAP gives 19 March 1986 as the registration date of ibm.com.", "IBM hosts no endpoint for version 4.1 that we found, so there is no status page. The repository has no changelog file. Dated notes sit in the README under What's New.", "Weights are on huggingface.co under the ibm-granite organisation and the code is at github.com/ibm-granite/granite-guardian, both off ibm.com." ], "score": 73 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/granite-guardian.json", "live": { "slug": "granite-guardian", "githubStars": 185, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://ibm.com/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "valid", "expires": "2026-11-14T00:00:00+00:00", "checkedAt": "2026-10-14T15:46:18.256075117Z" }, "domain": { "domain": "ibm.com", "registered": "1986-03-19", "source": "https://rdap.verisign.com/com/v1/domain/ibm.com", "checkedAt": "2026-10-11T13:17:26.804077685Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-10-14T23:56:06.423897999Z" } }, "facts": [ { "a": "HTTP API", "b": "Model API", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "Mohit Singh (mohitdebian)", "b": "IBM", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "no (local only)", "b": "no (local only)", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "HTTP, stdio", "b": "HTTP", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "None", "b": "None", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Free", "b": "Free", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "MIT", "b": "Apache 2.0 for the weights and the repository", "name": "Licence" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "none", "b": "2026-04-29", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "no document linked", "b": "no document linked", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "no document linked", "b": "no document linked", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "0 stars", "b": "182 stars", "name": "Popularity" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "Granite Guardian scores 60.1 (C) on agent readiness against AgentGate's 48.5 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, AgentGate or Granite Guardian?" }, { "answer": "Neither needs a key.", "question": "Do AgentGate and Granite Guardian need an API key?" }, { "answer": "AgentGate runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. No hosted endpoint is listed for Granite Guardian.", "question": "Can an agent call AgentGate and Granite Guardian without installing anything?" }, { "answer": "AgentGate is open source (MIT). No open-source release is listed for Granite Guardian.", "question": "Are AgentGate and Granite Guardian open source?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": null, "also": [ "Runs on your own machine", "Free to start without a card", "Open source" ], "goodFor": "A team that wants a self-hosted check between an agent and its shell, database or webhook tools, with a human approval queue.", "slug": "agentgate", "watchFor": "Agent endpoints need no key unless `AG_AGENT_KEY` is set, the proxy binds 0.0.0.0:8080, and the dashboard key defaults to `dev-key-123`" }, { "aheadOn": [ "Reliability, 56 against 44", "Schema \u0026 documentation, 60 against 47", "Agent ergonomics, 69 against 53", "Security \u0026 auth, 58 against 49", "Maintenance \u0026 community, 47 against 28", "Transparency \u0026 trust, 70 against 56" ], "also": null, "goodFor": "A team with a GPU that wants one English-language judge for harm, jailbreaks, RAG groundedness, function-call checks and house rules, under a permissive licence with no gate.", "slug": "granite-guardian", "watchFor": "Trained and tested on English only, per the model card" } ], "job": { "capability": "guard.policy", "name": "Policy enforcement" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-bedrock-guardrails-vs-granite-guardian.json", "title": "Amazon Bedrock Guardrails vs Granite Guardian", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-bedrock-guardrails-vs-granite-guardian" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-ai-content-safety-vs-granite-guardian.json", "title": "Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields) vs Granite Guardian", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-ai-content-safety-vs-granite-guardian" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-granite-guardian.json", "title": "Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Granite Guardian", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-granite-guardian" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/google-model-armor-vs-granite-guardian.json", "title": "Google Cloud Model Armor vs Granite Guardian", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/google-model-armor-vs-granite-guardian" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-llamafirewall.json", "title": "Granite Guardian vs LlamaFirewall", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-llamafirewall" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-guardrails-ai.json", "title": "Granite Guardian vs Guardrails AI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-guardrails-ai" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-lakera-guard.json", "title": "Granite Guardian vs Lakera Guard (Check Point AI Guardrails)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-lakera-guard" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-llama-guard.json", "title": "Granite Guardian vs Llama Guard 4", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-llama-guard" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-mistral-moderation.json", "title": "Granite Guardian vs Mistral Moderation API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-mistral-moderation" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-nemo-guardrails.json", "title": "Granite Guardian vs NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-nemo-guardrails" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-openai-guardrails.json", "title": "Granite Guardian vs OpenAI Guardrails", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-openai-guardrails" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-openai-moderation.json", "title": "Granite Guardian vs OpenAI Moderation API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-openai-moderation" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-prisma-airs.json", "title": "Granite Guardian vs Prisma AIRS AI Runtime Security API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-prisma-airs" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-amazon-bedrock-guardrails.json", "title": "AgentGate vs Amazon Bedrock Guardrails", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-amazon-bedrock-guardrails" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-azure-ai-content-safety.json", "title": "AgentGate vs Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-azure-ai-content-safety" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-cisco-ai-defense-inspection.json", "title": "AgentGate vs Cisco AI Defense Inspection API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-cisco-ai-defense-inspection" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-google-model-armor.json", "title": "AgentGate vs Google Cloud Model Armor", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-google-model-armor" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-guardrails-ai.json", "title": "AgentGate vs Guardrails AI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-guardrails-ai" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-lakera-guard.json", "title": "AgentGate vs Lakera Guard (Check Point AI Guardrails)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-lakera-guard" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-llama-guard.json", "title": "AgentGate vs Llama Guard 4", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-llama-guard" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-llamafirewall.json", "title": "AgentGate vs LlamaFirewall", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-llamafirewall" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-mistral-moderation.json", "title": "AgentGate vs Mistral Moderation API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-mistral-moderation" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-nemo-guardrails.json", "title": "AgentGate vs NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-nemo-guardrails" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-openai-guardrails.json", "title": "AgentGate vs OpenAI Guardrails", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-openai-guardrails" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-prisma-airs.json", "title": "AgentGate vs Prisma AIRS AI Runtime Security API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-prisma-airs" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-microsoft-presidio.json", "title": "AgentGate vs Presidio", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-microsoft-presidio" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-microsoft-presidio.json", "title": "Granite Guardian vs Presidio", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-microsoft-presidio" } ], "scores": [ { "agentgate": 44, "by": 12, "edge": "granite-guardian", "granite-guardian": 56, "key": "reliability", "name": "Reliability", "weight": 16 }, { "key": "performance", "name": "Performance", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "agentgate": 47, "by": 13, "edge": "granite-guardian", "granite-guardian": 60, "key": "schema", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "weight": 13 }, { "agentgate": 53, "by": 16, "edge": "granite-guardian", "granite-guardian": 69, "key": "ergonomics", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "weight": 13 }, { "agentgate": 49, "by": 9, "edge": "granite-guardian", "granite-guardian": 58, "key": "security", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "weight": 14 }, { "agentgate": 60, "by": 0, "edge": "", "granite-guardian": 60, "key": "payments", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "weight": 10 }, { "key": "tasks", "name": "Task success", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "agentgate": 28, "by": 19, "edge": "granite-guardian", "granite-guardian": 47, "key": "maintenance", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "weight": 7 }, { "agentgate": 56, "by": 14, "edge": "granite-guardian", "granite-guardian": 70, "key": "transparency", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "weight": 7 } ], "summary": "Granite Guardian scores 60.1 (C) on agent readiness against AgentGate's 48.5 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do policy enforcement.", "verdicts": { "agentgate": "An agent or its host can send each tool call to one REST endpoint, or wrap an MCP server, and get allow, deny or ask from a local classifier and a YAML policy, with an audit log and approval queue. The project is three days old, auth is off by default, and no detection accuracy is published.", "granite-guardian": "One ungated Apache 2.0 model judges harm, jailbreaks, RAG groundedness, function-call errors and custom criteria, with signed weights and published evaluation code. It is trained and tested on English only, each call checks one criterion, the 4.1 prompt format differs from 3.x, and IBM's watsonx.ai lists only the deprecated 3.0 model." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-granite-guardian", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-granite-guardian.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-granite-guardian.md", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-granite-guardian.min.md" }, "markdown": "Granite Guardian scores 60.1 (C) on agent readiness against AgentGate's 48.5 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do policy enforcement.\n\n- AgentGate: grade D, 48.5/100, rank #883 of 1094. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/agentgate.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/agentgate.json\n- Granite Guardian: grade C, 60.1/100, rank #563 of 1094. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/granite-guardian.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/granite-guardian.json\n- Best guardrails and safety filters for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/guardrails/index.md\n- All 132 guardrails comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/guardrails/index.md\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### AgentGate (D)\n\nGood for: A team that wants a self-hosted check between an agent and its shell, database or webhook tools, with a human approval queue.\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- Runs on your own machine\n- Free to start without a card\n- Open source\n\nWatch for: Agent endpoints need no key unless `AG_AGENT_KEY` is set, the proxy binds 0.0.0.0:8080, and the dashboard key defaults to `dev-key-123`\n\n### Granite Guardian (C)\n\nGood for: A team with a GPU that wants one English-language judge for harm, jailbreaks, RAG groundedness, function-call checks and house rules, under a permissive licence with no gate.\n\nAhead on:\n- Reliability, 56 against 44\n- Schema \u0026 documentation, 60 against 47\n- Agent ergonomics, 69 against 53\n- Security \u0026 auth, 58 against 49\n- Maintenance \u0026 community, 47 against 28\n- Transparency \u0026 trust, 70 against 56\n\nWatch for: Trained and tested on English only, per the model card\n\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | AgentGate | Granite Guardian | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 44 | 56 | Granite Guardian +12 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 47 | 60 | Granite Guardian +13 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 53 | 69 | Granite Guardian +16 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 49 | 58 | Granite Guardian +9 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 60 | 60 | even |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 28 | 47 | Granite Guardian +19 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 56 | 70 | Granite Guardian +14 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |\n| **Total** | | **48.5 · D** | **60.1 · C** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | AgentGate | Granite Guardian |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | HTTP API | Model API |\n| Vendor | Mohit Singh (mohitdebian) | IBM |\n| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |\n| Transports | HTTP, stdio | HTTP |\n| Auth | None | None |\n| Pricing | Free | Free |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Licence | MIT | Apache 2.0 for the weights and the repository |\n| Read-only variant documented | no | no |\n| llms.txt | no | no |\n| Last release | none | 2026-04-29 |\n| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |\n| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |\n| Customer content may train models | | |\n| Terms restrict automated access | | |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | | |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | | |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | | |\n| Popularity | 0 stars | 182 stars |\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**AgentGate.** An agent or its host can send each tool call to one REST endpoint, or wrap an MCP server, and get allow, deny or ask from a local classifier and a YAML policy, with an audit log and approval queue. The project is three days old, auth is off by default, and no detection accuracy is published.\n\n**Granite Guardian.** One ungated Apache 2.0 model judges harm, jailbreaks, RAG groundedness, function-call errors and custom criteria, with signed weights and published evaluation code. It is trained and tested on English only, each call checks one criterion, the 4.1 prompt format differs from 3.x, and IBM's watsonx.ai lists only the deprecated 3.0 model.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### AgentGate\n\n1. Create a session with the user's real goal first. The goal-alignment head scores every later call against it\n2. Pass earlier tool results in `history_override` with `untrusted: true` for web or email content, or the injection head sees only the action\n3. On `ask`, stop and tell the user the `decision_id`. Polling `/v1/decisions/:id` needs the dashboard key\n4. Treat `allow_with_checkpoint` as allow and keep the `checkpoint_id` for an undo\n5. Expect HTTP 404 with `not_found` for an unknown session and 401 when the owner has set an agent key\n\n### Granite Guardian\n\n1. Append the `\u003cguardian\u003e` block as the final user message, with the mode line, `### Criteria:` and `### Scoring Schema:`. Copy the strings from the model card, because no package builds them\n2. Use the no-think instruction for gating and parse `\u003cscore\u003e`. Think mode writes a reasoning trace first, and the card's examples allow up to 2,048 output tokens\n3. Treat `yes` as the criterion being met, which for built-in criteria means the risk is present. Treat a missing `\u003cscore\u003e` tag as a failed check\n4. Pass retrieved text through `documents=` and tool schemas through `available_tools=` in `apply_chat_template`, not inside the message text\n5. Under Ollama, set `num_ctx` in the request options. IBM's docs say the default context is short and long requests are truncated\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, AgentGate or Granite Guardian?\n\nGranite Guardian scores 60.1 (C) on agent readiness against AgentGate's 48.5 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.\n\n### Do AgentGate and Granite Guardian need an API key?\n\nNeither needs a key.\n\n### Can an agent call AgentGate and Granite Guardian without installing anything?\n\nAgentGate runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. No hosted endpoint is listed for Granite Guardian.\n\n### Are AgentGate and Granite Guardian open source?\n\nAgentGate is open source (MIT). No open-source release is listed for Granite Guardian.\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-granite-guardian.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-granite-guardian.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"agentgate\", \"b\": \"granite-guardian\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare agentgate granite-guardian`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/agentgate.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/granite-guardian.json\n\n## Other comparisons with AgentGate or Granite Guardian\n\n- [Amazon Bedrock Guardrails vs Granite Guardian](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-bedrock-guardrails-vs-granite-guardian.md)\n- [Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields) vs Granite Guardian](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-ai-content-safety-vs-granite-guardian.md)\n- [Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Granite Guardian](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-granite-guardian.md)\n- [Google Cloud Model Armor vs Granite Guardian](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/google-model-armor-vs-granite-guardian.md)\n- [Granite Guardian vs LlamaFirewall](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-llamafirewall.md)\n- [Granite Guardian vs Guardrails AI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-guardrails-ai.md)\n- [Granite Guardian vs Lakera Guard (Check Point AI Guardrails)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-lakera-guard.md)\n- [Granite Guardian vs Llama Guard 4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-llama-guard.md)\n- [Granite Guardian vs Mistral Moderation API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-mistral-moderation.md)\n- [Granite Guardian vs NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-nemo-guardrails.md)\n- [Granite Guardian vs OpenAI Guardrails](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-openai-guardrails.md)\n- [Granite Guardian vs OpenAI Moderation API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-openai-moderation.md)\n- [Granite Guardian vs Prisma AIRS AI Runtime Security API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-prisma-airs.md)\n- [AgentGate vs Amazon Bedrock Guardrails](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-amazon-bedrock-guardrails.md)\n- [AgentGate vs Azure AI Content Safety (Prompt Shields)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-azure-ai-content-safety.md)\n- [AgentGate vs Cisco AI Defense Inspection API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-cisco-ai-defense-inspection.md)\n- [AgentGate vs Google Cloud Model Armor](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-google-model-armor.md)\n- [AgentGate vs Guardrails AI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-guardrails-ai.md)\n- [AgentGate vs Lakera Guard (Check Point AI Guardrails)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-lakera-guard.md)\n- [AgentGate vs Llama Guard 4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-llama-guard.md)\n- [AgentGate vs LlamaFirewall](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-llamafirewall.md)\n- [AgentGate vs Mistral Moderation API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-mistral-moderation.md)\n- [AgentGate vs NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-nemo-guardrails.md)\n- [AgentGate vs OpenAI Guardrails](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-openai-guardrails.md)\n- [AgentGate vs Prisma AIRS AI Runtime Security API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-prisma-airs.md)\n- [AgentGate vs Presidio](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-microsoft-presidio.md)\n- [Granite Guardian vs Presidio](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-guardian-vs-microsoft-presidio.md)\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "attributionRequired": true, "credit": "CC BY 4.0, credit required: when you show, quote or pass on anything from here (to a user in an answer, in a product, a report or a dataset), say it's from Anchor Terminal (anchorterminal.com) and link the page or API address you took it from. Reviews also credit their author.", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-10-15", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.4", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "terms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "AgentGate vs Granite Guardian", "url": "" } ], "description": "Granite Guardian scores 60.1 (C) to AgentGate's 48.5 (D) for policy enforcement. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "AgentGate D 48.5", "Granite Guardian C 60.1", "scores" ], "h1": "AgentGate vs Granite Guardian", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/compare-agentgate-vs-granite-guardian.png", "path": "/compare/agentgate-vs-granite-guardian", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "AgentGate vs Granite Guardian for AI agents in 2026: scores and prices", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-10-15", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentgate-vs-granite-guardian" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 2700, "slim": 530 }, "version": 1 }