Head to head · Docs parse · October 2026 research run
Extend API + MCP vs Nanonets API + MCP
Extend API + MCP has a score of 62.9 (B) against Nanonets API + MCP's 42.6 (E). Both do docs parse. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 74 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Extend API + MCP for
- reliability (+22)
- schema & documentation (+26)
- agent ergonomics (+21)
- security & auth (+13)
- maintenance & community (+74)
Pick Nanonets API + MCP for
- payments & pricing (+5)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Extend API + MCP | Nanonets API + MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 67 | 45 | Extend API + MCP +22 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 87 | 61 | Extend API + MCP +26 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 68 | 47 | Extend API + MCP +21 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 43 | 30 | Extend API + MCP +13 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 35 | Nanonets API + MCP +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 82 | 8 | Extend API + MCP +74 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 67 | 65 | Extend API + MCP +2 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 62.9 · B | 42.6 · E |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Extend API + MCP | Nanonets API + MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Extend | Nanonets |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.extend.ai | https://extraction-api.nanonets.com/api/v2 |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | MIT (docstrange library) |
| Tools exposed | 86 | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | ai.extend/extend | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-25 | 2025-10-31 |
| Popularity | 124k npm/wk, 59k PyPI/wk | 1.6k stars, 47 PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 4/5 (2) | 2/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Extend API + MCP
Hosted MCP with OAuth scoped to workspaces and to test or production, and a tools filter with nine groups. Parse is billed on top of Extract, Split and Classify, so Performance Extract costs 5 credits a page.
Nanonets API + MCP
Extraction API returns Markdown, CSV or JSON, with named fields or a JSON schema. No public changelog and no dated release in the last 90 days.
Before you call either
Extend API + MCP
- Connect with
https://mcp.extend.ai/mcp?tools=parse,extract,filesto keep the schema small - Every MCP call names a workspace and TEST or PRODUCTION; start in TEST
- Read
retryableon an error before retrying, and honourRetry-Afteron a 429 - Budget 5 credits a page for Performance Extract, since the parse step is billed on top
- Sync
POST /extractblocks up to 5 minutes; use/extract_runsand poll or a webhook for long files
Nanonets API + MCP
- Use the extraction API at
extraction-api.nanonets.com, notapp.nanonets.com, unless you already have a trained model - Pass a JSON schema in
json_optionswhen downstream code needs fixed field names - Use the async extract endpoints for long documents and poll
/api/v1/extract/results/{record_id} - On a 429, wait 30 seconds and double the delay each retry
- Budget per page, since a 10-page PDF through an extraction block is 10 runs
Other comparisons with Extend API + MCP or Nanonets API + MCP
- Adobe PDF Services / PDF Extract API vs Extend API + MCP
- Adobe PDF Services / PDF Extract API vs Nanonets API + MCP
- Extend API + MCP vs LlamaParse API + MCP
- Extend API + MCP vs Mistral OCR API
- Extend API + MCP vs Reducto API + MCP
- Extend API + MCP vs Unstructured API + MCP
- LlamaParse API + MCP vs Nanonets API + MCP
- Mistral OCR API vs Nanonets API + MCP
- Nanonets API + MCP vs Reducto API + MCP
- Nanonets API + MCP vs Unstructured API + MCP
- Extend API + MCP vs Mindee API
- Extend API + MCP vs Veryfi API + MCP
- Mindee API vs Nanonets API + MCP
- Nanonets API + MCP vs Veryfi API + MCP
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/extend.json·/api/v1/tools/nanonets.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/extend-vs-nanonets.md