Head to head · Docs ocr · October 2026 research run
Extend API + MCP vs Mindee API
Extend API + MCP has a score of 62.9 (B) against Mindee API's 61.5 (C). Both do docs ocr. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 5 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Extend API + MCP for
- payments & pricing (+5)
Pick Mindee API for
No category where it leads by five points or more.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Extend API + MCP | Mindee API | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 67 | 65 | Extend API + MCP +2 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 87 | 86 | Extend API + MCP +1 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 68 | 68 | even |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 43 | 40 | Extend API + MCP +3 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 25 | Extend API + MCP +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 82 | 85 | Mindee API +3 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 67 | 67 | even |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 62.9 · B | 61.5 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Extend API + MCP | Mindee API |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Extend | Mindee |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.extend.ai | https://api-v2.mindee.net/v2 |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | none |
| Tools exposed | 86 | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | ai.extend/extend | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-25 | 2026-09-30 |
| Popularity | 124k npm/wk, 59k PyPI/wk | 42 stars, 33k npm/wk, 5.5k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 4/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Extend API + MCP
Hosted MCP with OAuth scoped to workspaces and to test or production, and a tools filter with nine groups. Parse is billed on top of Extract, Split and Classify, so Performance Extract costs 5 credits a page.
Mindee API
Extracted data kept 12 hours by default (1 to 24 configurable), deletable on fetch, source files never stored. Every call needs a model_id created in the web platform first.
Before you call either
Extend API + MCP
- Connect with
https://mcp.extend.ai/mcp?tools=parse,extract,filesto keep the schema small - Every MCP call names a workspace and TEST or PRODUCTION; start in TEST
- Read
retryableon an error before retrying, and honourRetry-Afteron a 429 - Budget 5 credits a page for Performance Extract, since the parse step is billed on top
- Sync
POST /extractblocks up to 5 minutes; use/extract_runsand poll or a webhook for long files
Mindee API
- Create the model in the Mindee app and store its
model_id; the API can't create one for you - Enqueue returns 202; poll the job or use a webhook, and keep polling under 1,200 a minute
- Send
Authorization: $MINDEE_API_KEYwith no Bearer prefix - Turn on confidence scores only when needed, since they cost 1.5 credits a page instead of 1
- Keep schemas to 25 fields or fewer, the documented recommendation
Other comparisons with Extend API + MCP or Mindee API
- Adobe PDF Services / PDF Extract API vs Extend API + MCP
- Extend API + MCP vs LlamaParse API + MCP
- Extend API + MCP vs Mistral OCR API
- Extend API + MCP vs Nanonets API + MCP
- Extend API + MCP vs Reducto API + MCP
- Extend API + MCP vs Unstructured API + MCP
- Adobe PDF Services / PDF Extract API vs Mindee API
- Extend API + MCP vs Veryfi API + MCP
- LlamaParse API + MCP vs Mindee API
- Mindee API vs Mistral OCR API
- Mindee API vs Nanonets API + MCP
- Mindee API vs Reducto API + MCP
- Mindee API vs Unstructured API + MCP
- Mindee API vs Veryfi API + MCP
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/extend.json·/api/v1/tools/mindee.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/extend-vs-mindee.md